Re: WWE Title is a Shambles
No it's not. It's still the Number One achievement in the business for elevating talent to stardom. Look at what winning the title did for Cena, Edge, Orton, CM Punk. It's had it's flops (Miz Del Rio) but almost all of the time, winning the title puts a wrestler in a permanent position of some relevance, be it in the main event or competing for the WHC. Compare this to TNA's title. Which doesn't elevate anyone. Austin Aries and Bobby Roode were in a barely relevant tag team within two years of winning the title, Mr. Anderson barely got TV time (last I watched) and is basically an extra with the Biker Ninjas, Samoa Joe was relegated to an undercard joke with the Nation of Violence gimmick and James Storm is in a tag team with Gunner that no one cares about.
The WWE Title is still seen as the holy grail in kayfabe terms and can still make stars where the WHC or TNA title cannot.
Just because you're stuck in the Attitudez Eraz doesn't mean there's any actual problem.
EDIT: FUCKING AUTOCORRECT
Last edited by Mountain Rushmore; 07-23-2013 at 08:41 PM.