wrestling_junkie

Maybe I am reading too much into this, but when Ziggler hit into AJ and she fell into Big E arms - maybe this could foreshadow a future face turn thats planned. Personally I would keep Ziggler heel for now, but I could see something on the lines of AJ siding more with Big E because he protects her kind of storyline. In the coming months, AJ becomes more close to Big E which distracts Ziggler and causes him to lose his matches or something.

Than maybe down the line, Ziggler can get rid of AJ and feud with Big E as a face and do the ' overcome the odds ' type of angle which would give Ziggler the rub straight into the World Title picture as a babyface. Do I think there is room for another babyface? to be honest no, but I wouldnt be suprised if that moment right there was a start to a split from Ziggler/AJ/Big-E

__________________

EMMA WATSON - JUST ENCASE YOU BOYS WERE CURIOUS TO SEE WHO THIS HOT SPECIMEN OF A WOMAN IS

Expectnomercy316

People would hate him, if he does the overcome the odds bullshit.

takingunder

he would not promo " i am beating the odds", but when he does win a match, he does beat the odds, or win because the other guy is leaving the company.

StraightEdge91

Glad you used "of" in the correct way this time, OP.

__________________

JY57

didn't see it but they should split this stable up. its obvious its going nowhere.

just keep Langston with AJ Lee and let Ziggler go about his business

__________________

vanboxmeer

Dutch Mantell is just another manager that's better than AJ that's on the same show. Adding to Ricardo and Paul Heyman.

__________________
I do have one question for anyone who might feel that Dwayne Johnson "owes" the business. Is it just him, or is it anyone who moved on to other things? Should Luna Vachon get heat for running a towing company instead of working on RAW? Should Maven be critiqued on his Home Shopping Network bits instead of wrestling?

Or is it only the ones who go on to highly visible careers in movies that owe something? Why do Johnson (who left after putting people over, doing the traditionally "right thing") and Lesnar (who did not; except for making Eddie a legitimate star) get called sell-outs who "forgot where they came from" when someone who retires to do some regular job get credit (as they should) for moving on and making it without falling into a sea of addiction?