Wrestling Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

POSSIBLE SPOILER return for tonight's RAW

21K views 211 replies 124 participants last post by  Clique 
#1 · (Edited)
Several people have seen undertaker in Nashville (where raw is tomorrow)

Source: nodq.com

Undertaker in Nashville. Was seen at the Nashville predators game tonight. Must mean return for tomorrow right?

This is actually just on nodqs facebook page, not on their site yet
 
#5 ·
Re: Several people have seen undertaker in Nashville (where raw is tomorrow)

There's no reason for him to appear until CM Punk finishes up with Rock, he won't be on the air. If he's doing ANYTHING at Raw, it will be discussing if he's coming back and how to work the angle with Punk. Otherwise, he's just a Predators fan.
 
#7 ·
There's no reason for him to appear until CM Punk finishes up with Rock, he won't be on the air. If he's doing ANYTHING at Raw, it will be discussing if he's coming back and how to work the angle with Punk. Otherwise, he's just a Predators fan.


how do you know he's gonna fued with punk?
 
#9 ·
Undertaker was in attendance at the 2/10 Nashville Predators NHL game. News reporter @JonBurton32 tweeted the following:

"Just shook hands with The Undertaker at the Preds game"

This could mean absolutely nothing but RAW is in Nashville.

Thanks to Ralz Welborn and others for passing these photos along:
Source: http://nodq.com/wwe/362567586.shtml




Taker was at a hockey game in Nashville tonight, and RAW is in Nashville tomorrow. Dave Meltzer also reported about 10 minutes ago live on Live Audio Wrestling (a toronto based weekly wrestling radio show) that Undertaker will be at RAW tomorrow. For what it's worth, Meltzer also reported on Sunday last week that Sammartino would be inducted into the Hall of Fame the next night, and that turned out to be true before ANY reports online were confirmed.

So if Meltzer is reporting it, AND Taker is in Nashville, I think there could be a big possibility that he's there. Or else, what other reason does Taker have to be there?
 
#100 ·
Re: **HUGE SPOILER** BIG POSSIBLE return at tomorrow nights RAW.

Brock vs Taker Yes Yes Yes :)

Not getting my hopes up but it would be nice
I'm still hanging my hat on this tbh. People seem to be convinced it'll be against Punk because Punk has no big Mania matches left outside of the WWE title scene... but is it really beyond the realms of possibility that the WWE title match will be triple threat? Punk might just beat Rock and force the situation to triple threat lol...

Ok, maybe not - but I can still see it being Brock vs Taker. Everyone was hot for this match happening a few years ago when they had that confrontation at the UFC.

Although if the Royal Rumble has taught me anything I guess it should be that the most obvious outcome is the most likely. HHH vs Brock II, Cena vs Rock II and that leaves Punk with the possibility of Taker as the leftovers.
 
#13 ·
Re: **HUGE SPOILER** BIG POSSIBLE return at tomorrow nights RAW.

He seems old and fat. It's not happening, he's going to take a year off to get back in shape. Love and respect him, but I refuse to see a match that is shit.
 
#24 ·
Re: **HUGE SPOILER** BIG POSSIBLE return at tomorrow nights RAW.

Well, I guess we will see if Meltzer really has some good sources. I really hope that The Heisenberg will return, though.
Like I said, Meltzer reported last week Sunday night before ANY reports leaked out that Sammartino was going to be announced as a inductee for the HOF this year, and he was right on that. Let's see if he can make it two in a row.
 
#25 ·
Re: **HUGE SPOILER** BIG POSSIBLE return at tomorrow nights RAW.

Why do ppl wanna see Brock vs Taker? wouldnt even the dumbest fan know who is gonna win.

But yeah Taker looks old in those pictures, I wouldnt expect him at Raw though. He cant confront Brock because its to early and he cant confront Punk cuz theres still EC.
 
#32 ·
Re: Several people have seen undertaker in Nashville (where raw is tomorrow)

No he isn't, Lesnar is feuding with Triple H. This has been 100% confirmed for MONTHS and because it's Triple H, there's no chance of it changing. He wants his win back, that's the end of it.
 
#33 ·
No he isn't, Lesnar is feuding with Triple H. This has been 100% confirmed for MONTHS and because it's Triple H, there's no chance of it changing. He wants his win back, that's the end of it.


there not doing HHH/Brock. No one wants to see that
 
#34 ·
Re: Several people have seen undertaker in Nashville (where raw is tomorrow)

Nobody even NEEDS to want to see it, it's not selling the PPV. Rock and Cena II is.

But ok, whatever, believe anything you want. Then you can personally apologize to me when Triple H starts feuding with Brock, like everyone but you can already see.

I'm sure Undertaker is gonna come back to avenge VINCE MCMAHON, Triple H's father in law. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
#36 ·
Re: **HUGE SPOILER** BIG POSSIBLE return at tomorrow nights RAW.

I really don't understand why WWE would want to use him at Wrestlemania again. He's 20-0. That's a perfect, round number. Really, unless he can make it to 25-0, it seems weird to me. He's hurt. I listened to Paul Bearer on a podcast a couple weeks ago talking about how bad of shape that 'Taker is in & how he wished people would just leave him alone. I agree with Paul Bearer. 'Taker has given us everything. He doesn't owe us anything else, man. Twenty fucking years. That's enough.
 
#60 ·
Re: **HUGE SPOILER** BIG POSSIBLE return at tomorrow nights RAW.

I really don't understand why WWE would want to use him at Wrestlemania again. He's 20-0. That's a perfect, round number. Really, unless he can make it to 25-0, it seems weird to me. He's hurt. I listened to Paul Bearer on a podcast a couple weeks ago talking about how bad of shape that 'Taker is in & how he wished people would just leave him alone. I agree with Paul Bearer. 'Taker has given us everything. He doesn't owe us anything else, man. Twenty fucking years. That's enough.
I agree with you. 20-0 looks awsome. 21-0 still awsome but doesnt look as good as 20-0.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Top