Re: WWE Considering Two Major Feud For Brock Lesnar In 2013
I prefer they do Brock/Sheamus than Orton. That match would be pure street fight brawl and would be cool. Sheamus as one of Brock's opponenets is believable
Here we go with that size crap again. You know nothing about wrestling, do you? If it was Brock/HBK, you would probably sing a different tune.
And for the record, if Brock takes shits that big, he needs to see a doctor.
yea, because Michaels is miles better than Bryan. Brock needs a real physical, bigger type guy to compete with. Bryan would be thrown around like a rag doll
__________________
Fav 5:
Dolph ziggler
Randy Orton
John Cena
Kane
The Shield
Re: WWE Considering Two Major Feud For Brock Lesnar In 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by xdoomsayerx
yea, because Michaels is miles better than Bryan.
Actually he's not. Bryan is definitely better in the ring than he is. HBK being the "greatest wrestler of all time" is pure WWE propoganda, he's great but he's vastly less impressive than made out to be.
__________________
Game of Thrones has been renewed for season 4. A man is pleased.
"As the future of the land hangs in the balance, no one will rest until the Seven Kingdoms have exploded in a veritable storm of swords...."
Re: WWE Considering Two Major Feud For Brock Lesnar In 2013
Either do Lesnar/Taker or nothing.
Lesnar/Taker writes itself, they have a history, and it'll be different from the "I respect you but I'll going to kill you" at WM storyline. They should just have Lesnar outright say he doesn't respect Taker and (unlike Shawn and Triple H) he won't hold anything back. He has nothing to lose, and he has nothing else to prove. The Streak will make him the biggest name in wrestling history and he's do whatever he takes to win. Even if that means beating Taker to a pulp. And Taker never beat Lesnar in his rookie year. Now, Lesnar has years of experience both in the professional wrestling world and MMA world. He's a legit MMA fighter and former UFC Champion. He's not only going to beat Taker, he's going to break him. He broke Triple H's arm twice without remorse, he broke Shawn Michaels arm without remorse.
Brock Lesnar doesn't care about anybody else but Brock Lesnar.
Undertaker is frail old man, a shell of his former self but he somehow always find a way to pull through at Wrestlemana. How in the hell will he beat a former WWE and UFC Champion who shows no remorse for anybody. Not to mention Taker never beat Lesnar, so Lesnar knows how to beat Taker.
I mean, come on. It fuckin' writes itself. It's the only match that I feel is worthy of a Streak match besides Taker/Cena, which should be done ideally at WM 30.
Nobody wants to see Triple H/Lensar two. Taker and Punk have no chemistry. Who the hell wants to see Lesnar vs. Orton? The only match I can see happening is Lesnar/Punk, and that's only because of Paul Heyman's involvement with both men. But seriously, who's going to think there's a possibility of Punk beating Brock freakin' Lesnar? Even in kayfabe, Punk doesn't stand a chance.
__________________
Quote:
Professional wrestling is a television show.
Unnecessary flips and choreographed spots does not equal good wrestling.
TNA's current product is like someone trying to sell a type-writer in 2013.
Ryback: "Wrestling's fans in general are negative, alot of them."
Actually he's not. Bryan is definitely better in the ring than he is. HBK being the "greatest wrestler of all time" is pure WWE propoganda, he's great but he's vastly less impressive than made out to be.
What an embarrassing statement. You should be just completely ashamed. What you say does not matter anymore in your existence on here.
__________________
Fav 5:
Dolph ziggler
Randy Orton
John Cena
Kane
The Shield
WWE Considering Two Major Feuds For Brock Lesnar In 2013
Re: WWE Considering Two Major Feud For Brock Lesnar In 2013
