yep, had to insult my pic because you cant defend your awful statement....... keep dreaming about Bryan facing lesnar. Moving on
Id love for lesnar to square up against sheamus as well. It would be very a very physical match. Idk about Orton, the Guy is so fragile and gets hurt more and more I think lesnar would be a bad idea for him, plus this would mean he'd have to stay face which I really don't wanna see.
Uhh, I actually hate Bryan, I don't want him to face Lesnar, but talent is talent regardless. Bryan has far more technical ability than Michaels ever did, as well as a better blend of styles. He's basically the new Chris Benoit, only without the voices in his head telling him to kill his family.
- As noted before, WWE has offered Brock Lesnar another 1 year contract – believed to be similar to the current deal that expires at WrestleMania 29 in the sense that it’s for few dates and several million dollars.
Lesnar has not signed the contract yet but word going around is that there’s a good chance he will sign.
The big opponents being discussed for Lesnar in 2013 are CM Punk and Randy Orton. Lesnar vs. Orton had been discussed for 2012 but plans changed.
Source: Wrestling Observer Newsletter
CM Punk vs Lesnar or Orton vs Lesnar which one do you think is more likely to happen ?
Re: WWE Considering Two Major Feuds for Brock Lesnar
They will need to build Orton up before taking on Lesnar, at the moment he is nowhere near being a threat to Lesnar. Looking forward to Punk/Lesnar match up seems logical with them both being alligned with Paul Heyman. I'm guess Heyman will ditch Punk at stick with Brock, as Punk doesn't need the talker as much.
Lesnar/Taker writes itself, they have a history, and it'll be different from the "I respect you but I'll going to kill you" at WM storyline. They should just have Lesnar outright say he doesn't respect Taker and (unlike Shawn and Triple H) he won't hold anything back. He has nothing to lose, and he has nothing else to prove. The Streak will make him the biggest name in wrestling history and he's do whatever he takes to win. Even if that means beating Taker to a pulp. And Taker never beat Lesnar in his rookie year. Now, Lesnar has years of experience both in the professional wrestling world and MMA world. He's a legit MMA fighter and former UFC Champion. He's not only going to beat Taker, he's going to break him. He broke Triple H's arm twice without remorse, he broke Shawn Michaels arm without remorse.
Brock Lesnar doesn't care about anybody else but Brock Lesnar.
Undertaker is frail old man, a shell of his former self but he somehow always find a way to pull through at Wrestlemana. How in the hell will he beat a former WWE and UFC Champion who shows no remorse for anybody. Not to mention Taker never beat Lesnar, so Lesnar knows how to beat Taker.
I mean, come on. It fuckin' writes itself. It's the only match that I feel is worthy of a Streak match besides Taker/Cena, which should be done ideally at WM 30.
Nobody wants to see Triple H/Lensar two. Taker and Punk have no chemistry. Who the hell wants to see Lesnar vs. Orton? The only match I can see happening is Lesnar/Punk, and that's only because of Paul Heyman's involvement with both men. But seriously, who's going to think there's a possibility of Punk beating Brock freakin' Lesnar? Even in kayfabe, Punk doesn't stand a chance.