Thread Tools

ROGERTHAT21 · 01-07-2013, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zxLegionxz

Aww man that was great i havent had a good laugh today Sheamus shouldnt be anywhere near Lesnar,Punk facing taker for the streak is the biggest joke in wrestling history,Bryan doesnt deserve to stand in the same ring as HHH and Rock vs Ziggler shouldnt go beyond a 3 sec Rock win

Now for the actual topic im praying to the fucking gods this is true( i think is a long shot) Rock/Lesnar is the biggest match they can put right now by a mile it should happen any other option other than Rock/Taker makes no fucking sense when you got this rare talent for wrestlemania season,if it was up to me Rock wins the belt at the rumble(giving the people what they want) then he enters the chamber and Lesnar screws him out of the title setting the match for Mania no need to that worthless belt that Rock is making relevant for a couple of weeks to be put in the line cause both of them are far beyond that piece of trash,Cena can challenge the streak and punk can drop the title to Ryback(rumble winner);
A solid card to make a great Wrestlemania also saving Austin if he does return to Face lesnar for Mania 30 and Rock/Taker.

I dont think triple H is wrestling this Mania if they want him to go over Brock at some point good just not this Mania not with the potential matche as for Cena

cant belive his butt hurt marks are still crying a lost that happen a year ago

especially the one who turned his sig into a bitch fest and quit the forum for a couple of months

That's the problem, none of the current stars are credible enough to be in the same ring as the old stars. That isn't good for the company's future.

JTB33b · 01-07-2013, 02:35 AM

Lesnar to cost Rock his match against Punk and then the Rock inteferes in the rumble match and eliminates Lesnar who becomes a surprise entree.

LeaderOfM.D.R.S. · 01-07-2013, 02:35 AM

But what about Taker/Brock?

KeepinItReal · 01-07-2013, 02:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DogSaget

This is something I don't get. Why?

The house-show title matches never mean anything anyway, it always just the current feud with the champ retaining anyway.

I agree with you that it doesn't make sense, but that's what wrestling websites report.

KeepinItReal · 01-07-2013, 02:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DetroitRiverPhx

If you have HHH, Rock, Brock and Undertaker fighting at WM - why not have them fight four current guys who could use the rub to be made in the eyes of the wwe fans.

Brock Lesnar vs Sheamus

Undertaker vs CM Punk

HHH vs Daniel Bryan

The Rock vs Dolph Ziggler

Agree with this. You need to have wrestlers who, after all the big Mania promotion, can actually carry that value forward into future shows. Get the casual fans to tune in to see Lesnar and Rock, and by doing so get exposure for regular roster guys. Also, WrestleMania is all about 3 or 4 main events, so you gotta separate Lesnar and Rock to help make that happen.

I don't think HHH/Bryan makes sense though, just cuz Bryan isn't big enough, and I don't see what the feud would be about. I would love to see it though. If HHH turns heel at some pt?

TempestH · 01-07-2013, 02:46 AM

I wouldn't mind seeing Lesnar vs. Rock. If Rock and Lesnar were facing other opponents, then that would mean more time going into the past stars. Put them in a match against each other, and ideally, their combined screen time can be condensed.

LovelyElle890 · 01-07-2013, 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SinJackal

I hope that Vince McMahon's balls haven't shriveled up so much in his old age that he wouldn't still have the stones to do something like that.

I would personally buy Wrestlemania for the first time in a long ass time if that was actually the fued. Shit, if the rest of the card's dope as hell too, I'd pay $80 for it. It has the potential to be the largest grossing WWE PPV in history.

They should just completely blow their load on the card and charge a fuckton for it. It'd erase the shit ratings and buyrates they've had the last half a year and revitalize the company.

lol@ Punk/Taker suggestions. . .as if we don't know the outcome. Cena/Taker would be a more believable match. Put someone who actually has a chance of ending the streak. Better yet, have HBK come back and end it. He deserves it after putting the streak over as hard as he did. The fued with HBK made the streak relevant imo, so he should be the one to end it.

This is so true. I bought it last year when they had 4 matches that were going to be good but their stupid booking ruined last year's Wrestlemania. I guarantee that if you had Lesnar vs Rock for the WWE title, Cena vs Taker, Trips vs Punk, Heel Orton vs Sheamus for the WHC, and the rest of the card is solid, then at minimum you would do what Wrestlemania 28 did in buys last year. If they don't give their fans something big, then they are in danger of losing them because they are driving the majority of them away in droves every week.

zxLegionxz · 01-07-2013, 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ROGERTHAT21

That's the problem, none of the current stars are credible enough to be in the same ring as the old stars. That isn't good for the company's future.

Yeah thats the thing, people want to throw names at legends and icons only cause its Mania and because they need the ''rub'' but creative has done nothing to build their characters in a year its not Lesnars or Rocks fault this guys are not credible enough thats creative and the wrestlers job,look at Punk for example 400 plus with the title and he gets a match with the biggest name in wrestling i have no problem with that,but guys like Bryan and ziggler who havent done anything relevant in a year get to face monsters like Lesnar or Taker makes no sense,yes Mania is the big payoff but you need to work and bite you way to the top to get that rub with the legends the chance its not just given to you thats the point,this is a business and the point is to make money and out of the current roster the only man who can put butts in seats its Cena

RAWImpact · 01-07-2013, 02:51 AM

I would like to see some of the part-time megastars take on some of the top talent on WWE's current roster and a match with The Rock, The Undertaker, Triple H or Brock Lesnar would definitely raise their stock, which I do indeed think is something that WWE needs right now.

That having been said, what needs to be understood is that this is WrestleMania we're talking about. It's the WWE's biggest show of the year and the show needs to have the biggest matches of the year. Part-time or not, whether you like it or not, a match like The Rock vs. Brock Lesnar, for example, is huge because it will give WWE the mainstream attention that it's looking for. And more eyes on WWE programming can never be a bad thing. And personally, if you were to ask me which match I'd rather see, Rock/Lesnar or something like Lesnar/Sheamus, I'd choose Rock/Lesnar in a heartbeat.

Not sure if I buy the Rock/Lesnar stuff, but I guess we'll see in the coming weeks.

Masquerade · 01-07-2013, 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Cynical Miracle

Bullshit. HHH needs his much needed win back. Theres no money to be made with Brock V Rock. Do whats best for THE BUSINESS and put HHH over to prove, once and for all, WWE is better then UF(ake)C.

Either you are a troll or 10 year old.