CHECK OUT THE RATINGS Thread [Post All TV Ratings Discussions Here] - Page 9 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Closed Thread

Old 01-08-2013, 10:58 PM   #81 (permalink)
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,709
mb1025 251 - 500mb1025 251 - 500mb1025 251 - 500mb1025 251 - 500mb1025 251 - 500
Default Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by dxbender View Post
People aren't saying ratings aren't important, but why people on here care, is what makes no sense. WWE getting a 3.2 or 3.15 rating has NO difference to anyone on this site, yet they obsess over it as if they've invested their life savings into WWE stocks. Though even TV ratings don't seem to have an impact on the WWE stock price.
Because ratings is what keeps your TV on the air. If you like to watch the WWE people would be interested to know what their ratings are like because it impacts if they will able able to watch the WWE in the future.

I have been saying on other forums that WWE is lucky that there isn't a WCW type company right now. Looking past going to 3 hours WWE is looking very much like WCW 2000 everyday.

I also think a lot of people are over looking that the WWE is just rinse and repeating their road to WrestleMania's every year. You always the have moment of staring at the banner or the big name coming back to get in a promo battle. You have the same names rumored to be involved with the same names. You put Taker in a match we know he won't lose.

I remember Chris Jericho was interviewed on the Monday Night Wars DVD and he said you couldn't tell what day it was in WCW well the WWE is right there in that same boat.

Nothing is new. Rock and Punk felt like we turned back the clock and replaced Cena with Punk. They used the same material and PUnk went back to breaking the 4th wall. Would be nice if we didn't hear that stuff all the time, but we do. Kind of has no impact after watching it all the time.
mb1025 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 01-08-2013, 11:00 PM   #82 (permalink)
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
ROGERTHAT21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,242
ROGERTHAT21 4501 - 5000ROGERTHAT21 4501 - 5000ROGERTHAT21 4501 - 5000ROGERTHAT21 4501 - 5000ROGERTHAT21 4501 - 5000ROGERTHAT21 4501 - 5000ROGERTHAT21 4501 - 5000ROGERTHAT21 4501 - 5000ROGERTHAT21 4501 - 5000ROGERTHAT21 4501 - 5000ROGERTHAT21 4501 - 5000
Default Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

It doesn't really matter what anyone says, whatever the rating say...the buyrates will show The Rock and Punk are both big draws. But mainly Rock, of course. A mark gotta mark.
__________________

Sig Credit: Bubba-3D
ROGERTHAT21 is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 06:53 AM   #83 (permalink)
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
uknoww's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 434
uknoww 1501 - 2000uknoww 1501 - 2000uknoww 1501 - 2000uknoww 1501 - 2000uknoww 1501 - 2000uknoww 1501 - 2000uknoww 1501 - 2000uknoww 1501 - 2000uknoww 1501 - 2000uknoww 1501 - 2000uknoww 1501 - 2000
Default Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by ROGERTHAT21 View Post
It doesn't really matter what anyone says, whatever the rating say...the buyrates will show The Rock and Punk are both big draws. But mainly Rock, of course. A mark gotta mark.
the rock will show that he is a big draw maybe the biggest one in wwe history
but cm punk?c'mon man he is the worst drawing champion since diesel 1995
__________________
the best
uknoww is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 07:04 AM   #84 (permalink)
Little Poppa Pump
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mizzou Tiger Country
Posts: 2,407
TomahawkJock 1001 - 1500TomahawkJock 1001 - 1500TomahawkJock 1001 - 1500TomahawkJock 1001 - 1500TomahawkJock 1001 - 1500TomahawkJock 1001 - 1500TomahawkJock 1001 - 1500TomahawkJock 1001 - 1500TomahawkJock 1001 - 1500TomahawkJock 1001 - 1500
Default Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Kinda hard to say Punk is the cause of it all when the rest of the show is utter shit as well.
__________________
TomahawkJock is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 07:28 AM   #85 (permalink)
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
 
jonoaries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 555 Centaur Dr.
Posts: 4,306
jonoaries 1501 - 2000jonoaries 1501 - 2000jonoaries 1501 - 2000jonoaries 1501 - 2000jonoaries 1501 - 2000jonoaries 1501 - 2000jonoaries 1501 - 2000jonoaries 1501 - 2000jonoaries 1501 - 2000jonoaries 1501 - 2000jonoaries 1501 - 2000
Default Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by dxbender View Post
People aren't saying ratings aren't important, but why people on here care, is what makes no sense. WWE getting a 3.2 or 3.15 rating has NO difference to anyone on this site, yet they obsess over it as if they've invested their life savings into WWE stocks. Though even TV ratings don't seem to have an impact on the WWE stock price.
People are looking for validation. They want to be able to use buys, TV ratings etc to justify their biases and nostalgia. Its a talking point and nothing more. Nobody even knows what USA Network or WWE's thought process about TV ratings are or why things are how they are, they just want the talking point.


Its impossible to know unless you work in these places how important these numbers are to them and why. So in reality, they just want to use them to perpetuate their personal biases and to validate their opinions. Considering we all stating our opinions in here, most don't feel they need any validation of their personal opinion, but some do, its a sad state of affairs where your satisfaction of with what you see depends on what other people see.
jonoaries is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 07:51 AM   #86 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Evil Peter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 991
Evil Peter 251 - 500Evil Peter 251 - 500Evil Peter 251 - 500Evil Peter 251 - 500Evil Peter 251 - 500
Default Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonoaries View Post
People are looking for validation. They want to be able to use buys, TV ratings etc to justify their biases and nostalgia. Its a talking point and nothing more. Nobody even knows what USA Network or WWE's thought process about TV ratings are or why things are how they are, they just want the talking point.


Its impossible to know unless you work in these places how important these numbers are to them and why. So in reality, they just want to use them to perpetuate their personal biases and to validate their opinions. Considering we all stating our opinions in here, most don't feel they need any validation of their personal opinion, but some do, its a sad state of affairs where your satisfaction of with what you see depends on what other people see.
I agree with you. For some it's ammunition to use so they can try to make their opinion into fact. Am exercise in complete futility but they are still trying.

It becomes even less relevant when the numbers are what they are but WWE still shows faith in Punk, giving him a record breaking run. That says a bit about what WWE thinks, although that shouldn't matter much to anyone what they think about Punk. Whether it's good or bad, it's our own opinions that matter.
Evil Peter is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 08:05 AM   #87 (permalink)
Learning to break kayfabe
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 127
wb1899 101 - 250wb1899 101 - 250
Default Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Its no secret that for USA Network (and 99% of the other channels) only the A18-49 numbers (Live+SD and C3) are important.
wb1899 is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 08:08 AM   #88 (permalink)
FEAR THE BROCKTAGON
 
JY57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 10,420
JY57 4501 - 5000JY57 4501 - 5000JY57 4501 - 5000JY57 4501 - 5000JY57 4501 - 5000JY57 4501 - 5000JY57 4501 - 5000JY57 4501 - 5000JY57 4501 - 5000JY57 4501 - 5000JY57 4501 - 5000
Default Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

http://www.lordsofpain.net/news/wwe/...be_a_STAR.html

Quote:
- The internal belief is that RAW will stick to three hours at least through WrestleMania 29. This doesn't mean that it will go back to two hours after WrestleMania but there will definitely not be a change between now and then. There are top officials who believe that going to three hours hasn't been good for the product.

Source: F4Wonline.com
whoever those top officials are deserve a raise
__________________
http://images.wikia.com/deusex/en/images/e/e7/Adam_Jensen_Concept.jpg
JY57 is offline  
Old 01-09-2013, 09:03 AM   #89 (permalink)
Working on my abs
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,697
D.M.N. 1501 - 2000D.M.N. 1501 - 2000D.M.N. 1501 - 2000D.M.N. 1501 - 2000D.M.N. 1501 - 2000D.M.N. 1501 - 2000D.M.N. 1501 - 2000D.M.N. 1501 - 2000D.M.N. 1501 - 2000D.M.N. 1501 - 2000D.M.N. 1501 - 2000
Default Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Hour 1 - 4.29m
Hour 2 - 4.32m
Hour 3 - 4.65m

http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/201...i-more/164357/
D.M.N. is online now  
Old 01-09-2013, 09:08 AM   #90 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: England
Posts: 876
purple_gloves 251 - 500purple_gloves 251 - 500purple_gloves 251 - 500purple_gloves 251 - 500
Default Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by D.M.N. View Post
Hour 1 - 4.29m
Hour 2 - 4.32m
Hour 3 - 4.65m

http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/201...i-more/164357/
No real surprises then.
__________________
Cena is crap.

purple_gloves is offline  
Closed Thread



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios