if you go back to those the NEW ECW and His Smackdown World championship run. His number were consistent across the board as champion. the SECOND he was pushed with the title. These are NOT jokes and the Numbers prove it. People actually like mark henry.
The Mark 'Ratings' Henry joke gets thrown around a lot but there's truth to it. Mark Henry is a legit draw. Has been since his days as the ECW Champ.
Never happened without Cena, Vince and a part timer legend beside him and it's not going to happen when he's virtually by himself.
Last time Punk was the viewership carrier of a segment, he lost 150k.
Please. That bullshit already got pwned the first time you folks tried(& failed) to use it. Hence you've reworked it with "safe" words to leave yourself a hole to weasel out of when you inevitably get called on for trying to use this bullshit yet again, as you are now, words such as "virtually" and "viewership carrier" because you know damn well the last two segments he had actually by himself both GAINED- post12749114
Originally Posted by SerapisLiber
Originally Posted by deadmanwatching
when the ratings increases its phill the draw , when they loses its Brodus clay
Originally Posted by Hawksea
Take out the real viewership magnets around his vicinity and they won't sit around for his 97 lbs pizza hut delivering ass.
Originally Posted by Cookie Monster
Don't you see how stupid it is?
So because a segment gained in which CM Punk was in, it's not down to him but The Rock and Ryback. Yet when they lose viewers, it's not because of the likes of Brodus Clay, it is in fact CM Punk.
Originally Posted by Choke2Death
Right, so when he has segments with others and it gains viewers, the credit goes to him. But if it's the same scenario and viewers go away, it's all down to however he was in the ring with.
Totally makes sense.
Well, let's check the data and see...
Originally Posted by JY57
The Punk interview before Rock came out did a 3.17 rating