CHECK OUT THE RATINGS Thread [Post All TV Ratings Discussions Here] - Page 56 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #551 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-29-2013, 04:23 PM
Malkamania
 
Stad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 7,642
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
                     
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amuroray View Post
Knew it. Punk was the cancer all along.
Sounds like you on this forum.

Stad is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #552 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-29-2013, 04:40 PM
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
 
vanboxmeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,167
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

8:00 - 4.86
9:00 - 5.27
10:00 - 4.93

Bo Bo-ing Bo-ver Barrett equates higher volume of meat bags inspecting the television.

I do have one question for anyone who might feel that Dwayne Johnson "owes" the business. Is it just him, or is it anyone who moved on to other things? Should Luna Vachon get heat for running a towing company instead of working on RAW? Should Maven be critiqued on his Home Shopping Network bits instead of wrestling?

Or is it only the ones who go on to highly visible careers in movies that owe something? Why do Johnson (who left after putting people over, doing the traditionally "right thing") and Lesnar (who did not; except for making Eddie a legitimate star) get called sell-outs who "forgot where they came from" when someone who retires to do some regular job get credit (as they should) for moving on and making it without falling into a sea of addiction?
vanboxmeer is online now  
post #553 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-29-2013, 04:42 PM
Parks and Recreation Dept.
 
HankHill_85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 3,470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

From TV By The Numbers:

WWE Entertainment USA 9:00 PM 5.27 2.0
WWE Entertainment USA 10:00 PM 4.93 1.9
WWE Entertainment USA 8:00 PM 4.86 1.8

Started out damn good, second hour fantastic, dropped some in last hour. Hopefully the Lesnar/Vince segment got people talking. Damn fine numbers, I'd say. Road to WrestleMania looking great.

I'm a Brock Lesnar Guy.


Arrive, F5, Rinse and Repeat...
HankHill_85 is offline  
post #554 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-29-2013, 04:45 PM
Two in the back of the head. Quick and painless.
 
KoЯn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 12,634
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Let's see, only counts Nielson households, DVRs don't count (so for those who had to work or whatever else, they won't count which includes me every single week), people switching off cuz of something that sucks earlier in the show, plus plenty of people who would rather fast forward through the bullshit than sit there for 3 fuckin' hours.

All the added up, ratings aren't telling at all. There are so variables, and truth is people only brag when its their favorite wrestlers in the higher rated segments, then those same people sing a different tune when their favorite ends up in a shitty rated segment.

Ratings don't mean shit in the long run. I only come to this thread to see the hilarious theories some of the trolling haters have when they think they actually know everything.
KoЯn is offline  
post #555 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-29-2013, 04:49 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Amuroray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 531
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                   
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Cenas bit was in the 2nd hour right?

. Obvious punk was the problem. ratings will be great with rock as champ.

cm punk cant draw
Amuroray is offline  
post #556 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-29-2013, 04:56 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Amuroray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 531
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                   
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stad View Post
Sounds like you on this forum.
Im going to be completely honest with you.

That was a fucking awful joke m8 you irrelevant bender.
Amuroray is offline  
post #557 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-29-2013, 04:58 PM
Goatin' ain't easy
 
The GOAT One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: London
Posts: 1,157
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
               
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Biggest since Raw 1000?


The GOAT One is offline  
post #558 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-29-2013, 05:01 PM
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
Oliver-94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London
Posts: 3,347
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGreatOne. View Post
Biggest since Raw 1000?

Indeed

http://www.wrestlingforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic210074_24.gif
Oliver-94 is offline  
post #559 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-29-2013, 05:01 PM
There are many copies... and they have a plan.
Premium
 
SrsLii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: At home
Posts: 1,053
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by K.W.H. View Post
Let's see, only counts Nielson households, DVRs don't count (so for those who had to work or whatever else, they won't count which includes me every single week), people switching off cuz of something that sucks earlier in the show, plus plenty of people who would rather fast forward through the bullshit than sit there for 3 fuckin' hours.

All the added up, ratings aren't telling at all. There are so variables, and truth is people only brag when its their favorite wrestlers in the higher rated segments, then those same people sing a different tune when their favorite ends up in a shitty rated segment.

Ratings don't mean shit in the long run. I only come to this thread to see the hilarious theories some of the trolling haters have when they think they actually know everything.
I feel like we have this same discussion every week.

DVR viewers are factored in to ratings. Ratings are adjusted for "delayed viewings" up to seven days later. FFS.
SrsLii is offline  
post #560 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-29-2013, 05:03 PM Thread Starter
$9.99
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20,011
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
                     
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by vanboxmeer View Post
8:00 - 4.86
9:00 - 5.27
10:00 - 4.93

Bo Bo-ing Bo-ver Barrett equates higher volume of meat bags inspecting the television.
That legit? If so then that's very good for them. If the entire hour was over 5 million then it's pretty certain that whatever the big thing was in that hour did really well, Rock, right? Same goes for the third hour. I'm expecting a big overrun number now looking at this. WWE should be pleased. I wonder if the viewers will stick around next week. With an ending like Vince/Heyman/Lesnar, you'd like to think so.

BEST FOR CHRISTMAS is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome