CHECK OUT THE RATINGS Thread [Post All TV Ratings Discussions Here] - Page 51 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #501 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-24-2013, 01:12 PM
Working on my abs
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                   
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by the fox View Post
and the great tna rating is?
What does that have to do with anything?

I think all things considered, WWE has a lot more to worry about than TNA as far as ratings go.

Last edited by murder; 01-24-2013 at 01:20 PM.
murder is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #502 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-24-2013, 03:19 PM
Getting over in the mid-card
 
bigdog40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 6,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by murder View Post
What does that have to do with anything?

I think all things considered, WWE has a lot more to worry about than TNA as far as ratings go.


WWE should worry about TNA when TNA can actually buyout WWE's top stars which will be never. This isn't the Monday Night Wars, and before then nobody knew what the ratings were or even met.

Quote:
Originally Posted by new_guy View Post
People complain about newer talent not getting over, but what they mean is that their favourite isn't getting over, everyone else can go to hell. I'm for as many people getting over as possible, it would improve the show and the more over people there are, the more avenues there are to push new talent, yes, your favourites are more likely to get pushed if there are more over people to feud with.
bigdog40 is offline  
post #503 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-24-2013, 06:07 PM
Working on my abs
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                   
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdog40 View Post
WWE should worry about TNA when TNA can actually buyout WWE's top stars which will be never. This isn't the Monday Night Wars, and before then nobody knew what the ratings were or even met.
I didn't say WWE has to worry about TNA, I said WWE has more to worry about TV ratings than TNA does.

By the way, what do you mean, nobody knew what the ratings were before the Wars? We know TV ratings dating back to 1985.
murder is offline  
post #504 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-24-2013, 10:14 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
deadmanwatching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 826
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Skidmark187 can't draw.
deadmanwatching is offline  
post #505 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 03:11 AM
Two in the back of the head. Quick and painless.
 
KoЯn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 12,572
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by murder View Post
I didn't say WWE has to worry about TNA, I said WWE has more to worry about TV ratings than TNA does.

By the way, what do you mean, nobody knew what the ratings were before the Wars? We know TV ratings dating back to 1985.
I think he meant fans didn't care or ever talk about it. Ratings were never a hot topic to fans until the Monday Night Wars heated up in '97.
KoЯn is offline  
post #506 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 07:45 AM
Little Poppa Pump
 
roadkill_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: The WWE Universe
Posts: 2,314
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
                     
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by the fox View Post
and the great tna rating is?
TNA is 10 years old. WWE is 60 years old with 100 times the budget but only twice the rating.

TNA: 1.1
WWE: 2.2, just last month.
roadkill_ is offline  
post #507 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 11:07 AM
Moron
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,758
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by SrsLii View Post
I think I'm going to go download 1995 and watch it so it's fresh in my mind and see if it makes today's crap any better.

A few wrestlers back then are legends now.You would definetly enjoy it.
austin316 G.O.A.T is offline  
post #508 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 04:18 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
ChickMagnet12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 910
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

TNA have been hovering around 1.0 since forever. They will never be on a competitive level with WWE.






Quote:
Originally Posted by Redead View Post
you guys are losers, i cant believe you actually watch wrestling

i just sit at home and watch the tickets being sold off the ticketmaster website to see whos drawing

sometimes if the show is in town, i feel extra daring and go to the arena and watch them sell tickets IN PERSON

other day i started jerking off in the ticket both at all that DRAWING and had to be escorted out of the arena
ChickMagnet12 is offline  
post #509 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 05:48 PM
Moron
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,839
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChickMagnet12 View Post
TNA have been hovering around 1.0 since forever. They will never be on a competitive level with WWE.
They will comepete with the WWE one day. It's just a matter of time. TNA's Impact taping tonight in Manchester:

The Tony is offline  
post #510 of 6575 (permalink) Old 01-25-2013, 06:12 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
El_Absoluto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 977
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
           
Re: Official Raw Ratings Thread 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by roadkill_ View Post
TNA is 10 years old. WWE is 60 years old with 100 times the budget but only twice the rating.

TNA: 1.1
WWE: 2.2, just last month.
-PPV sales
-Merch sales
-Toy sales
-House shows

TNA is a non issue.

A mark for:

Daniel Bryan, Ambrose, Rollins, Brock Lesnar

All time faves:

Bret Hart, Austin, CM Punk
El_Absoluto is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome