Is it time for Cena to put people over cleanly?? - Page 6 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #51 of 92 (permalink) Old 01-02-2013, 05:37 PM
Humbled
 
123bigdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 821
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: Is it time for Cena to put people over cleanly??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliffy Byro View Post
lol

Talk about clueless. Cena hasn't been a BIG star since 2007.

Sure he might still make them abit but it's nowhere near the level of 5 years ago.
Wow. . . Just wow.

That is as ignorant as it gets folks. Clearly you are the clueless one. Cena hasn't been a BIG star since 2007? You are definitely retarded.
123bigdave is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #52 of 92 (permalink) Old 01-02-2013, 05:50 PM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: England
Posts: 10,366
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                   
Re: Is it time for Cena to put people over cleanly??

Cena will never put people over he is the golden boy
Kelly Kelly fan is offline  
post #53 of 92 (permalink) Old 01-02-2013, 05:57 PM
TONY IN DECEMBER!
 
Jason Garretts Nightmare Before Christmas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Big D
Posts: 10,969
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
                     
Re: Is it time for Cena to put people over cleanly??

Quote:
Originally Posted by 123bigdave View Post
Wow. . . Just wow.

That is as ignorant as it gets folks. Clearly you are the clueless one. Cena hasn't been a BIG star since 2007? You are definitely retarded.
Nice Insult.

And there's a difference between being a star & a big star.

Cena got injured in 07, came back in 08, lost a shitload of matches, got injured again an hasn't been the same since.

It's not hard to comprehend. Cena was hot between 05-07 but isn't anymore.



Quote:
Originally Posted by mattb425 from THE BOARD
Mid-Atlantic is The Godfather, New Japan is The Shawshank Redemption, ECW is Pulp Fiction, WCW is the Mass Effect video game series, and TNA is 2 Girls 1 Cup.
Jason Garretts Nightmare Before Christmas is offline  
post #54 of 92 (permalink) Old 01-02-2013, 06:01 PM
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Korvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,196
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: Is it time for Cena to put people over cleanly??

If Cena really believes in Hustle, Loyalty, Respect and all of the other terms that he preaches then he will be willing to put guys over when the prime of his career is over and I don't believe that it is done yet.

Sure, we all hate seeing "Super Cena" but he has put guys over off and on that people choose to not remember because of the dislike for the guy.

Cena is todays Golden Boy, you are right. There is nothing wrong with that though. Yes, Cena is still a BIG star. Maybe not the Golden Boy or Big Star that you want, but he is nonetheless.
Korvin is offline  
post #55 of 92 (permalink) Old 01-02-2013, 06:25 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Billy Afterthought's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
   
Re: Is it time for Cena to put people over cleanly??

Quote:
Originally Posted by silverspirit2001 View Post
Cannot make new stars, if old (red) giant stars are sucking all the mass and energy from new smaller stars. Stellar nurseries are created from the death of old stars in dust clouds...

I love astronomy - so much symbolism to life. And entertainment.
Your sig makes me bust out laughing every time I see it.

Billy Afterthought is offline  
post #56 of 92 (permalink) Old 01-02-2013, 07:54 PM
Getting over in the mid-card
 
bigdog40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 6,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Is it time for Cena to put people over cleanly??

This just proves that whenever a Cena thread is being discuss. The Cena haters try to skew it or overexgarrate (sp) what Cena does or justify what "putting over" means when in reality, they don't have the slightest clue and don't know what they are talking about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by new_guy View Post
People complain about newer talent not getting over, but what they mean is that their favourite isn't getting over, everyone else can go to hell. I'm for as many people getting over as possible, it would improve the show and the more over people there are, the more avenues there are to push new talent, yes, your favourites are more likely to get pushed if there are more over people to feud with.
bigdog40 is offline  
post #57 of 92 (permalink) Old 01-02-2013, 09:34 PM
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
KO Bossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: East of the Pacific Ocean, West of London, England, South of Mars, North of Hell
Posts: 8,322
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
                     
Re: Is it time for Cena to put people over cleanly??

God almighty, some of the stupidity in this thread is just mind boggling. Pull up a chair kids, time for a lesson.

Let's start with clean loss, which is something a lot of people are getting confused about. A clean loss means a wrestler loses in a fashion that is devoid of interference, outside circumstances, distraction, anything. Its just a simple no nonsense pin in the middle of the ring. Goldberg beating Hogan? NOT clean. Curt Henning came down to ringside, followed closely by Karl Malone and DDP. Malone gave Henning a Diamond Cutter while Page taunted Hogan. Hogan, who had just hit Goldberg with a leg drop, was distracted and was pointing and shouting at Page, drawing attention away from his opponent, who when recovered, hit Hogan with a Spear and Jackhammer to win. Nothing about that was clean.

Second, we move on to everyone's favorite golden boy. Cena has, in his time, put over SOME opposition cleanly. HBK, Trips, Batista, etc. However, what Cena is absolutely terrible at is SELLING the loss. That is a big thing people in this thread don't seem to get. You can lose in an unclean fashion and still put your opponent over huge (which is what happened with Edge, for example, or Punk). The babyface absolutely has to make it seem to the viewers, in attendance and at home, that their loss means something, and at the same time that the heel's win means something. The heel won and the babyface lost, so both parties must do their part to sell, to the audience, the ramifications of what the outcome means. For the heel, a win over the babyface, clean or not, means that they got the better of the babyface and that the villain is in a position of strength, and the babyface must sell that the loss shows them in a position of weakness. This is absolutely CRUCIAL. It puts the situation in danger of becoming won out by the side of evil, and therefore gives good a reason to overcome it. Overcoming the obstacle is what provides us with adversity, from adversity we derive drama, and thus entertainment.

Cena's problem, with almost all of his feuds as of late, is that he doesn't sell the loss. The villain beats Cena, then Cena, typical to his character, goes out and says "ah well, better luck next time for me. So what if I lost, I owned up to it. I rise above hate, and I know in my heart that I'm the best in this industry." Now the victory the heel gained means nothing. Why? Because the babyface he beat has flat out stated that the win meant nothing, the loss meant nothing and there's no reason for any sort of feud to continue. THAT is a problem. Effectively, Cena is stealing the heat from his opponent and giving it back to himself. When the heel has no heat, where's the interest in seeing them get beaten? They're just another guy. Its like you have to start all over again. Where's the build up of the heel as a legitimate threat or contender who the fans are supposed to take seriously? There isn't any once Cena gets on the mic.

He constantly does this. Nexus, Punk, Brock, now Ziggler, all of them. Either he wins and celebrates it as a big deal, or he loses, and sluffs it off like it wasn't a big deal. This is a big problem with the Cena character. He's designed to rise above hate, in other words, to not make it seem like losing gets to him. Its the character's way of being a good role model to children-you know, don't let opposition get you down, fight to achieve your goals, etc. Unfortunately, while it might be a good message to kids, it makes the character so incredibly boring. His saying that a crushing loss won't affect him actually becomes a virus that ends up fucking over the guys he WORKS with as well. Its not just that the Cena character is dying, it actually kills the guys he goes up against as well.

Remember Punk in the summer? "Hey Cena, why should you get a title shot, I've beaten you 3 times. I've always come out on top against you." Alright, Punk is trying to build up his heel character by showing that the babyface has constantly lost to him. He's establishing that the babyface has a real obstacle to overcome, which would be actually beating him. Then Cena gets on the mic. "Punk your whole 300 day reign has been irrelevant, I don't care if you give me another title shot, I'll just get one later anyway." Wow. Punk has beaten Cena 3 times, including once as a heel, so Cena counters that Punk's reign has made the title worthless and Cena doesn't care that Punk has beaten him. Way to make the heel seem credible. I really want to see him get beaten now that you've told me his title means nothing and that even though you've lost to him 3 times, that means nothing as well. In fact, he even says that he'll end up with another title shot later anyway, which means that regardless of the outcome of the match, Cena will ultimately come out on top. So Punk now has a worthless title, worthless wins over the top guy in the company and Cena will get what he wants eventually anyhow. All of these things meant something, until Cena said they didn't. He failed to play up the importance, and he's the top guy. If he thinks they're important, then his fans and the audience will think they're important as well. He doesn't, so that kills it. Why would you want to see a Punk/Cena match, as a casual fan, when Cena has already said that he doesn't care that he wins or loses, and says that his losses to this guy from before didn't mean anything? That means that if he loses now, it won't mean anything, in which case why the fuck are they wrestling?

For the audience to be interested in a feud, they have to see the heel look like they're are in an advantageous position that the babyface needs to overcome. Part of the heel's advantageous position is the babyface acting like they're a real threat. When the babyface doesn't, the heel is no longer in an advantageous position and the interest in the match just dies. All because the babyface didn't act like the threat was credible or legitimate. And its in this area that Cena is a grievous offender. Forget putting people over cleanly, he needs to fucking act like what he's involved in has a point.



TL;DR version-Cena loses enough, he needs to stop no selling his losses.



Shield 2.0, Brah!

Seth with J&J Security=One of the few reasons to watch WWE
KO Bossy is offline  
post #58 of 92 (permalink) Old 01-02-2013, 11:37 PM
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
RVP_The_Gunner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Scotland
Posts: 3,376
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: Is it time for Cena to put people over cleanly??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn Morrison View Post
this, this and this. Cena losing clean should be a very rare occasion cause he is the TOP GUY, and he will be for years to come. The monthly clean putting over comes when you are less than a year from retirement. Cena doesn't need to do that at this stage, anyone who even feuds with him gets put over by that. For example, Cena put over Edge, it didn't involve any 'clean' losses, in fact Edge used the dirtiest tactics to beat Cena, which is why he got over big as a heel. Not only is it ridiculous that IWC wants every new face to beat Cena clean, it's even more that they want heels to beat him clean. What will that accomplish? Heels are meant to cheat, it helps them get heat and be known as the bad guys.
Says someone with not removing until........ "cena lose cleanly" in their list lol





Top 5 (At the moment):

1. Damien Sandow (fo' life)
2. Seth Rollins
3. Daniel Bryan
4. Luke Harper
5. Bad News Barrett


WE WANT ZAYN
RVP_The_Gunner is offline  
post #59 of 92 (permalink) Old 01-03-2013, 01:49 AM
Moron
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 598
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: Is it time for Cena to put people over cleanly??

Cena putting over people in any significant way would be worthless bc WWE wouldnt follow it up by pushing them up the card in a effective way. Punk is a perfect example of this, Cena put him over tons of times yet WWE refused to book him properly. W/o good booking it doesnt matter if you beat Hogan/Austin/Rock for 3 straight PPV and do it again bc you have to be positioned as either THE guy or equal to the guy.
Icon_Vs_Icon is offline  
post #60 of 92 (permalink) Old 01-03-2013, 05:15 AM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
HitMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 910
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: Is it time for Cena to put people over cleanly??

Cena sold his loss to rock pretty well. Seemed devastated outside the ring. I have also seen a lot of other wrestlers no sell their losses, not just Cena.
HitMark is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome