You see that I mentioned that Austin's heel turn was a flop. So, what makes you think Cena's might not be a flop to? If they turn him, "just to turn him," it could be a big mistake for the company. Just like how turning Austin was a big mistake for the company and he turned face again 7 months later because The Rock didn't work as a top face. Who's to say that they guy they choose to fill the top face spot won't be a failure? Sure, there's a risks that can be taken in wrestling, but why take it when there's no reason to.
Cena is loved by the younger audience and hated by a large portion of the older audience. If he was to turn heel I guarantee you, we should see the older audience on his side while the kids boo him. Were back to square one.
There's not losing substantial amount of money every year, their ratings are decent, their buyrates are decent, their attendance is good. So, business wise it makes no sense at all to turn Cena heel.
So, give me a logical reason was to why John Cena should turn heel. And don't give me the "he's boring, he's stale, he need's to change." Because to a large portion of the audience (the kids) that's not true. And you mention the feuds I proposed and how they are boring. Well, tell me what feuds he will have as a heel? And no, Tyson Kidd or Zack Ryder don't count.
So because Austin's heel turn was a flop, Cena's will be too? You see, the difference there is, Austin wasn't constantly booed at every arena like Cena is. Oh great, Cena is loved by the young and gullible audience, which means we can't mess with his character now! Which means kids will stop watching, right? Wrong, do I need to repeat myself with how you can just insert any credible face into his spot, and that will be the kids' new hero now? And the younger audience makes a small portion of the audience and income the WWE gets, despite what you and Vince think. And lol at their buy rates and attendance being good, you can't even admit that yourself, you have to use half ass words like "decent", guess you're satisfied with mediocrity.
Uh how about you give me your logical fuckin reason for keeping Cena face? I already gave my reasons in my previous post, it's not about turning him just to turn him. I already mentioned that they need new stars and more depth, you can't do that with just one guy running the show like a fuckin king. Build new faces with a monster heel, even the so called "king of burials" aka Triple H with his mighty "shovel" was able to build new stars with his heel run. And how is Cena being boring and stale not a good reason? Jesus Christ, you really are satisfied with mediocrity aren't you?
Wow, you are really trying hard to keep Cena face with naming jobbers like Tyson Kidd and Zack Ryder? Well feuds you can have with Cena are:
Shaemus (it hasn't happened with him as a face)
Ryback (that would be Vince's wet dream)
Randy Orton (if he remains face)
The Rock (the only time they should have Cena go over face Rock)
CM Punk (only IF you turn Punk face)
Dolph Ziggler (only if her turns face as well)
Undertaker (would be a great way to give him heat. I would even agree with Cena killing the streak)
These face vs heel feuds for Cena are something we haven't seen before. And lastly, after Roman Reigns is built up, he can be a bad ass face eventually and take on Cena. Roman Reigns' future looks promising, and the IWC isn't the only ones sold on him. Triple H is pretty sold on him, and being the Rock's cousin doesn't hurt either.