View Poll Results: Most impressive member of The Shield?
|
|
Ambrose
|
 
|
802 |
63.35% |
|
Rollins
|
 
|
158 |
12.48% |
|
Reigns
|
 
|
306 |
24.17% |
| Voters: 1266. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|
11-24-2012, 01:53 PM
|
#541 (permalink)
|
|
GET MY BAGS
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London, UK
Posts: 9,227
|
Re: Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins & Roman Reigns Discussion Thread
the wcw-vibe is strong with this
goldberg and nwo, lol.
__________________
[  Dranked Up, Smoked Up
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-24-2012, 04:12 PM
|
#542 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 286
|
Re: Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins & Roman Reigns Discussion Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by new_year_new_start
Calling it now -
Ryback will have a match with Punk at the PPV before the Rumble, hype up the Rock being impressed by Ryback. On the go home Raw before the PPV, Ryback gets mysteriously run over and is nowhere near 100 percent at the ppv and loses to Punk. This means Rock faces Punk and wins the title.
|
Know you're joking but I'll do you one better. Ryback beats Punk for the WWE Championship at TLC. I know he was royally screwed the first two times but still, losing 3 straight title matches doesn't make anyone look good. He holds the belt for a month and 2 weeks before the Rubmle, gets run over. Punk and Cena fight for the vacant Championship. Cena wins, through some controversial manner. We get Cena vs. Rock at the Rumble. Rock wins (again, through controversial fashion). Punk wins the Rumble. We get Punk vs. Rock at Mania or even Punk vs. Rock vs. Cena at Mania. I only say this b/c I would rather see Punk vs. Rock at Mania than the Rumble.
Quote:
Originally Posted by King_Of_This_World
So obvious where you lot are heading.
Non-stop hate will be levelled at Roman Reigns because he is the 'leader' and the main guy and Ambrose is not, I can guarantee thats where the IWC is heading.
So, so obvious.
|
There is no leader. I mean, really. We've seen them 3 times, attack people, and the most elaborate thing any of them has said is "get him up" or "let's do it again." You can't pick a leader through all of that. Allow this to progress longer than a week and let the story progress before we see who the leader is.
__________________
THE ONLY HURDLER IN THE WORLD I KNOW BY NAME...
AND IT'S NOT B/C OF HURDLING .
|
|
|
11-24-2012, 04:48 PM
|
#543 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Poland
Posts: 779
|
Re: Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins & Roman Reigns Discussion Thread
I don't care about Reigns. I like Rollins. But Ambrose... This guy is AWESOME !!! Hi is great in the ring, great on the microphone and very charismatic. He is definitely the future of the WWE.
|
|
|
11-24-2012, 04:54 PM
|
#544 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,301
|
Re: I never knew this about Roman Reigns
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heavenly Invader
I hate the ideology that if you're a son of a famous wrestler you deserve a spot or gets an instant push. He looks impressive but seeing if he's worth shit is yet to be determined.
|
It's not like Luther was that famous.
|
|
|
11-24-2012, 05:18 PM
|
#545 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Roaming the landscape like a Tyrannosaurus Rex
Posts: 1,006
|
Re: Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins & Roman Reigns Discussion Thread
Vince McMahon's bias toward big muscley athletic guys will ensure that Reigns gets a push. All anyone is saying is that WWE likes guys like Reigns, not that he's the best of the trio.
|
|
|
11-24-2012, 06:11 PM
|
#546 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Poland
Posts: 779
|
Re: Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins & Roman Reigns Discussion Thread
I've heard Roman Reigns is a "Triple H guy". So he has a bright future (look at Sheamus, Sin Cara, Sandow and others "Triple H guys"...). But with their great skills - Rollins and Ambrose have a bright future too.
|
|
|
11-24-2012, 06:33 PM
|
#547 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 102
|
Re: Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins & Roman Reigns Discussion Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentBarretaFan
I've heard Roman Reigns is a "Triple H guy". So he has a bright future (look at Sheamus, Sin Cara, Sandow and others "Triple H guys"...). But with their great skills - Rollins and Ambrose have a bright future too.
|
From who? Did someone tell you or were you eaves dropping? Or do you just have your 'sources'? (meaning you don't know the difference between hearing and reading - answering this post with 'i've heard you're post...)
Last edited by HelpingHand : 11-24-2012 at 06:34 PM.
Reason: yes the grammar was intentional.
|
|
|
11-24-2012, 07:29 PM
|
#548 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Roaming the landscape like a Tyrannosaurus Rex
Posts: 1,006
|
Re: Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins & Roman Reigns Discussion Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentBarretaFan
I've heard Roman Reigns is a "Triple H guy". So he has a bright future (look at Sheamus, Sin Cara, Sandow and others "Triple H guys"...). But with their great skills - Rollins and Ambrose have a bright future too.
|
To be fair, there have also been reports that Triple H likes Ambrose as well. I hope that's true.
|
|
|
11-24-2012, 07:38 PM
|
#549 (permalink)
|
|
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,862
|
Re: Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins & Roman Reigns Discussion Thread
Part of me wishes they would have feuded with 3MB since it would have been 3 vs 3. This would have been a great way to have a solid Survivor Series match with both teams having to find 2 more partners. This is where you debut The Ascension, but without the over dramatic entrance.
|
|
|
11-24-2012, 07:41 PM
|
#550 (permalink)
|
|
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,960
|
Re: Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins & Roman Reigns Discussion Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by truk83
Part of me wishes they would have feuded with 3MB since it would have been 3 vs 3. This would have been a great way to have a solid Survivor Series match with both teams having to find 2 more partners. This is where you debut The Ascension, but without the over dramatic entrance.
|
Having them feud with 3MB would have been a complete waste of their talent. Ambrose alone is better than all of the 3MB. Also, Ascension's entrance kicks ass.
__________________
Finally.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asenath
At this rate "bury" is never going to start sounding like a real word again.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|