Punk & Heyman mocking King's heart attack - Page 72 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Did WWE cross the line with Jerry Lawler tonight?
Yes 191 31.01%
No 404 65.58%
Undecided 21 3.41%
Voters: 616. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #711 of 833 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 01:44 PM
Stealing the Show
 
Ziggler Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 7,429
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Punk & Heyman mocking King's heart attack

Quote:
Originally Posted by faceface View Post
The difference between Vince mocking JR and Punk mocking Lawler is that Lawler has recovered from his heart attack, whereas JR will never completely overcome Bell's Palsy. The difference is akin to that of mocking a guy with a broken leg vs mocking an amputee.
on a technical level, no one ever recovers from a heart attack...
Ziggler Mark is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #712 of 833 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 02:39 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
BKKsoulcity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
       
Re: Punk & Heyman mocking King's heart attack

As long Punk and Lawler discussed everything over properly then I see no problem with it and if Vince gave Punk a big ol sick smile backstage then it is A-OK in my book

BKKsoulcity is offline  
post #713 of 833 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 02:45 PM
Working on my abs
 
leon79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Warrington, Cheshire.
Posts: 2,903
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
               
Re: Punk & Heyman mocking King's heart attack

It woudn't have gone ahead if Lawler himself was uncomfortable with what happened.

leon79 is offline  
post #714 of 833 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 02:53 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
BKKsoulcity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
       
Re: Punk & Heyman mocking King's heart attack

Quote:
Originally Posted by leon79 View Post
It woudn't have gone ahead if Lawler himself was uncomfortable with what happened.
Still ...Punk does his promos with no word by word script and adlibs a lot so some added things possibly could of been said/done that Jerry didn't know of.

BKKsoulcity is offline  
post #715 of 833 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 03:35 PM
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
KO Bossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: East of the Pacific Ocean, West of London, England, South of Mars, North of Hell
Posts: 8,297
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Punk & Heyman mocking King's heart attack

I don't agree with Jericho's excuse that "well we all know it was going to be made into an angle." I love ya Jericho, but that's crap. They didn't HAVE to make fun of it and make it into an angle. They chose to. Why? Because Vince is scum.

Then again, I should have seen this coming. Back at Wrestlemania 28, Lawler cracked a joke about Johnny Ace's white suit that said, and I quote, “That suit is so ugly, it would give Brother Love a heart attack.” Sure enough, two weeks before the event, Bruce Pritchard suffered two serious heart attacks. So that's how WWE deals with serious real life events. Makes them into jokes.

Of course, when TNA acknowledged Jerry Lawler's heart attack, they simply said "we send our best wishes to Jerry Lawler and hope he gets better soon. Our thoughts are with you, Jerry." Very tactful and respectful. Probably because TNA isn't run by total scum.

Answer me this-we get on Susan G. Komen for taking donations to their cancer research and using it to live extravagant lifestyles (6 figure salaries for higher ups), fund their administration and whatnot, basically making breast cancer a business. They're exploiting serious real life events and making a living off of it. How is WWE any different? They're exploiting serious real life events, Lawler' heart attack, and they're using it to further an angle an get a superstar over, who will sell merchandise and tickets and allow Vince to live his elite lifestyle. Why is one OK and the other is reprehensible?



Shield 2.0, Brah!

Seth with J&J Security=One of the few reasons to watch WWE
KO Bossy is offline  
post #716 of 833 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 03:44 PM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,704
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: Punk & Heyman mocking King's heart attack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggler Mark View Post
you know just because it happened during the Attitude era doesnt make it acceptable...oh, and I'm interested to know what % of the people defending this promo found Vince's mocking of JR to be reprehensible.
I quote you
Quote:
If you think this kind of promo was standard in the AE, then you probably didnt watch the AE.
There are many posts in this thread similar to "Attitude Era never stooped that low"
well I posted many segments from the AE that were even lower and proved that AE had even worst segments than a faked heart attack.
You wanted all edgy adult TV, there you have it and poop in the office of Mr. McMahon and Vince pissing his pants was Teletubbies compared to the fake heart attack.
And the big difference between the JR segment and this is that JR was not involved in that segment and probably nobody asked him for permission.

This thread proves that IWC would complain about anything WWE does but I'd rather have the forum complain about the heart attack than about Brodus Clay. At least I have my entertainment and watch some adult storylines.
DualShock is offline  
post #717 of 833 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 03:54 PM
Learning to break kayfabe
 
Pwnisher248's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Why do you care?
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: Punk & Heyman mocking King's heart attack

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falkono View Post
Really? Please remind me of when they did an angle based on an reality event where someone nearly died?

There were a lot of things which were brutal but they were staged and the angle themselves pulled you in. They didn't use cheap heat methods such as that.

Anyone else getting slightly iritated by people keep saying that?
As somebody else pointed out, what about when they continued Over the Edge after Owen Hart died or when they interviewed Melanie Pillman shortly after Brian Pillman's death? The WWE does this sort of thing all the time. By "this sort of thing" I meant stuff that pushed the envelope and got people talking. If this had happened in the Attitude Era, then Punk would have probably come out the next week wearing a T-shirt with something to the effect of "I broke the King's heart" written on it. Another thing I find funny is that a lot of the people on here defending Lawler (who probably gave them permission to do the segment or even came up with the idea himself) are probably the same ones who hated him for his increasingly awful commentary prior to his heart attack.

NOT REMOVING UNTIL:
  • [ ] Wade Barrett wins the world title or the WWE title
  • [ ] Damien Sandow wins a title
  • [ ] R-Truth turns heel again
  • [ ] Cody Rhodes and Goldust finally have their feud
  • [ ] The Usos lose the tag titles

Pwnisher248 is offline  
post #718 of 833 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 03:58 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Evil Peter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 991
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
         
Re: Punk & Heyman mocking King's heart attack

Quote:
Originally Posted by KO Bossy View Post
Answer me this-we get on Susan G. Komen for taking donations to their cancer research and using it to live extravagant lifestyles (6 figure salaries for higher ups), fund their administration and whatnot, basically making breast cancer a business. They're exploiting serious real life events and making a living off of it. How is WWE any different? They're exploiting serious real life events, Lawler' heart attack, and they're using it to further an angle an get a superstar over, who will sell merchandise and tickets and allow Vince to live his elite lifestyle. Why is one OK and the other is reprehensible?
The first difference that comes to mind is that the first is about handling money that people gave to cancer research, while the second is just making themselves noticeable, not spending any money that would otherwise have gone towards research. I don't think that's the same at all, just as I don't think it's the same to make a joke about that people starve in Africa and taking a very big salary out of the money that's donated to help feed said people.

There's such a big difference between things like those that I don't see how you can really compare them in that manner, even if you think both things are despicable. I'd bet that a joke about people starving wouldn't get the same wide criticism though, despite that world famine is far more important than a single guy getting a heart attack and surviving.

Last edited by Evil Peter; 11-14-2012 at 04:01 PM.
Evil Peter is offline  
post #719 of 833 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 04:02 PM
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
PunkDrunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 337
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: Punk & Heyman mocking King's heart attack

All the time? U had to go back 15 odd years for examples FFs.. That itself proves it wasn't standard.
Nobody ever said the AE was 100% perfect all the time. Just because it happened during the AE once or twice doesn't make AE fans hypocrites
PunkDrunk is offline  
post #720 of 833 (permalink) Old 11-14-2012, 04:31 PM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 974
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
         
Re: Punk & Heyman mocking King's heart attack

Bunch of sissies. A lot of people seem so upset with this and it's laughable.

The biggest problem with people today is that everyone is so fucking sensitive.

We live to die. Why should anything said or done bother you in the slightest? Is it fucking wrong to say or do something? How the fuck is something appropriate or unappropriate? Lawler probably doesn't give a fuck about the mock and why should he? What is there to care about? Some people like him and respect him and others don't. Some will mock him,while others will praise him. So what? Nobody is inclined to like or care about you and you shouldn't give a rats ass about any of that stuff. People are so obsessed with being liked and respected that they all come as fucking retards. Stop being offended by every fucking thing. Live you'r life how you want and stop torching yourself with the stuff people say or do.

Do you people know what was the first thing my grandfather said after his heart attack? Well he pulled out a joke about it. And you know what? I laughed. I laughed not because I didn't care about him or because I disrespect him, but because you need to have a proper approach to life. You shouldn't be insulted by any fucking thing in this life.

People make fucking lawsuits nowadays,because somebody told them they fucking suck dick. There is you'r problem - fucked up people who've lost complete touch with reality.

By the way we're talking about a show where everything is scripted. Hallelujah!

Last edited by Perfect.Insanity; 11-14-2012 at 04:34 PM.
Perfect.Insanity is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome