Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
Join Date: Aug 2011
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Re: Vince and the Officials treatment of Bryan
I honestly think Vince holds resentment towards him for being more over than he should be. Vince was probably massively embarassed that Sheamus Title win and the entire Raw show the next night were overshadowed by Bryan. Sure, he'll make his money out of YES and NO, but he did that with Zack Ryder merch too, and look at him. Bryan is not a "chosen one" He's like in between a Jericho role and a Christian role, a "good hand" that will get rewarded with a few World Titles, but essentially a guy who can be used to help get up and coming main eventers over.
What baffled me mostly was the fact that Raw is 3 hours long, an absolute drag to sit through, yet they send Daniel Bryan and Cody Rhodes out there, two guys who have really good chemistry and have had many great matches, yet only give them 2 minutes.
This "weak link" crap has completely run it's course though. Bryan beat Kane at Summerslam too, which makes it even dumber to portray him as the weak link.
I realise where they're going and that WWE will push Roman Reigns straight to the top. However for me, Dean Ambrose is by far the most talented in that group and I think eventually if they just give him the spotlight then he's going to shine. As soon as he touches a mic everyone else can just sit down as he's magic on it. So It remains to be seen, I think they're all talented but to me Dean was the star of that group. I think Roman looks like the star of that group but I don't think he's nearly as talented as Dean.