**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 898 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #8971 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-27-2012, 06:22 PM
Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,681
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Hour 3 BEAT hour 1. What happened there?
The-Rock-Says is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #8972 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-27-2012, 06:24 PM
Ex Con With A Heart Of Gold
 
SPCDRI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 8,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Isn't that the first hour in about 5 months that has happened?
SPCDRI is offline  
post #8973 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-27-2012, 07:06 PM
Cutting a shoot promo to get over
 
checkcola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 7,491
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The-Rock-Says View Post
Hour 3 BEAT hour 1. What happened there?
checkcola is offline  
post #8974 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-27-2012, 07:20 PM
THE CONQUEROR
 
RatedR10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,270
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Hour 3 WASN'T the lowest viewed hour!? It's a miracle alright.



"It's going to be great. I can't wait for the crowd, the noise, the energy in the building. I can't wait to take that all away from them."
- PK Subban
RatedR10 is offline  
post #8975 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-27-2012, 07:34 PM
Special Attraction at Wrestlemania
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 21,962
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

What is the final number for that? 2.3?

And it's indeed a miracle that the third hour beat hour one.
Choke2Death is offline  
post #8976 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-27-2012, 07:50 PM
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
KO Bossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: East of the Pacific Ocean, West of London, England, South of Mars, North of Hell
Posts: 8,305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

So uh...where's all the "lowest rating in 15 years" doomsday theorists?



Shield 2.0, Brah!

Seth with J&J Security=One of the few reasons to watch WWE
KO Bossy is online now  
post #8977 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-27-2012, 07:55 PM
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
KO Bossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: East of the Pacific Ocean, West of London, England, South of Mars, North of Hell
Posts: 8,305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Oh I'd also like to point out that in 2000, the Christmas NIGHT edition of Raw did a 3.8, so people relying on the excuse that it was a holiday for the poor number...there's proof that they've done well in spite of that in the past, which I believe takes weight away from the argument.



Shield 2.0, Brah!

Seth with J&J Security=One of the few reasons to watch WWE
KO Bossy is online now  
post #8978 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-27-2012, 09:16 PM
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
charmed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,992
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
             
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

It was a crappy show and honestly deserved even worst ratings..its just sad when people make excuses for something that horrible.

I Am the Master
charmed1 is offline  
post #8979 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-27-2012, 09:39 PM
Ho!
 
The Evil Santadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 14,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KO Bossy View Post
Oh I'd also like to point out that in 2000, the Christmas NIGHT edition of Raw did a 3.8, so people relying on the excuse that it was a holiday for the poor number...there's proof that they've done well in spite of that in the past, which I believe takes weight away from the argument.
3.8 in 2000? Wasn't that when they were normally getting 5.0's? 3.8 sounds like a poor rating for standards back then (and was it the lowest of the year)? Not saying it's a bad number, but the larger fanbase back then definitely had something to do with it.

In any event, terrible numbers, though it was in part due to it being on Christmas Eve (though only in part... with the way things are now, the numbers would've been terrible anyway).

I suppose I'll play the role of the blind Punk mark/hater this week and how the rating reflect his drawing ability.

DURRRRR PUNK WASNT ON SHOW 4 MORE THAN FEW MINUTES AND RATINGS SUCK! WE NEED MOAR PUNK!!!!!! MOAR BEESSSSSSSSSSST IIIIIIIINNNNNNNN THEEEEEEEEEEEEE WORRRRRRRRRRRRRLDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!

Edit: I am curious as to what the lowest rated segment was and what it got.

I'm watching you...



The Evil Santadow is offline  
post #8980 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-27-2012, 09:47 PM
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
KO Bossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: East of the Pacific Ocean, West of London, England, South of Mars, North of Hell
Posts: 8,305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Sandrone View Post
3.8 in 2000? Wasn't that when they were normally getting 5.0's? 3.8 sounds like a poor rating for standards back then (and was it the lowest of the year)? Not saying it's a bad number, but the larger fanbase back then definitely had something to do with it.

In any event, terrible numbers, though it was in part due to it being on Christmas Eve (though only in part... with the way things are now, the numbers would've been terrible anyway).

I suppose I'll play the role of the blind Punk mark/hater this week and how the rating reflect his drawing ability.

DURRRRR PUNK WASNT ON SHOW 4 MORE THAN FEW MINUTES AND RATINGS SUCK! WE NEED MOAR PUNK!!!!!! MOAR BEESSSSSSSSSSST IIIIIIIINNNNNNNN THEEEEEEEEEEEEE WORRRRRRRRRRRRRLDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!

Edit: I am curious as to what the lowest rated segment was and what it got.
Yes, I agree. However, my point is that this proves that they were able to draw a good rating even if it was a holiday in the past. The fact that a lot of people now say "well it was a holiday, that's why it sucks" says to me that they're using that as a crutch to rely on. They've shown definitively in the past that they could overcome MNF and holidays, so the fact that they aren't now is a reflection of the product, not something else (as others might try to say).



Shield 2.0, Brah!

Seth with J&J Security=One of the few reasons to watch WWE
KO Bossy is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome