**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 823 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #8221 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-01-2012, 02:00 AM
Proud #NewBlack
 
karla's christmas_SWAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 22,829
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 4 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by #Mark View Post
Do you people honestly expect people to sit through three hours of this shit? Regardless of who's champion, no one wants to invest their own time in the product because it's obvious the company doesn't invest their effort into it. Hell, we're the biggest wrestling fans on the planet and we can barely stomach 30 minutes of RAW. Blaming any of this on one wrestler makes little to no sense.

Anyways, I can't wait till Punk drops the title and the new champ draws the same exact numbers.. Would love to see if the hate transfers to him.
And what if it doesn't and asses start being put in seats, what will your excuse be? "Well Punk was booked like shit anyway"?


KARLA LOPEZ, THE HOTTEST MODEL/ACTRESS ALIVE. Sheamus, Swagger, Wade, Dixie, Cesaro, Sami, DB, RKO, Drew, Del Rio, Cody, Punk, AJ LEE / (STAY STRONG, JTG, AND DREW ) CHAMPviaDQ = Great GFX. Karla in Pink
karla's christmas_SWAG is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #8222 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-01-2012, 02:05 AM
Vince gives me a comedy gimmick
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: DMV
Posts: 6,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swagger_ROCKS View Post
And what if it doesn't and asses start being put in seats, what will your excuse be? "Well Punk was booked like shit anyway"?
I'm not even a Punk fan, I just understand the system's flawed. If it does, then Punk really isn't a draw, but I doubt it will.. I honestly don't even think Rocky as champ would make a substantial difference in this day and age (Saddens me because Rock's my favorite of all time).
#Mark is offline  
post #8223 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-01-2012, 05:49 AM
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
Duke Silver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by roadkill_ View Post
On the internet, we've had access to this thing called the quarter hour now. Had it since the 90s, often even by Tuesday night. Now, shall we discuss Punks quarter hour ratings?
Yeah, it's just a shame you take it at face-value.

I'm not saying that Punk is a draw, or that a 2.3 is a good number. Honestly, I don't care either way. I'm not sitting at home on a Tuesday afternoon frantically hitting F5 to see the latest numbers on who's watching wrestling. I don't care who's tuning in for Cena and tuning out for Punk. I'm not fascinated by buyrates or how much money The Rock made Vince McMahon last year. Ratings are absolutely and entirely irrelevant in my life at this time.

My one and only point was that it's dumb to look at the ratings and assume that it's all down to Punk. It's even worse when you look at a number and automatically assume that the decrease is down to people banding together in their "disinterest" of Punk. That's just delusional. That might be the case, but we have absolutely no way of knowing. With the awful numbers the third hour has been drawing, plus the lack of direction, terrible storylines, underdeveloped talent, and no star power, it's impossible to define a single reason that people are tuning out.

There are enough posters in this thread drilling that notion into the ground that I thought even the most ardent of Punk haters would've cottoned on by now. 2.3 is a shitty number and if Punk continued to pull those numbers it could be a problem. Can't say I care though. It's the fucking WWE.
Duke Silver is offline  
post #8224 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-01-2012, 06:47 AM
Working on my abs
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,770
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                   
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke Droese View Post

My one and only point was that it's dumb to look at the ratings and assume that it's all down to Punk.
Ok, I agree to an extent. But let's look at the best and worst raw rating of all time.

The best was on May 10th 1999, a 8.1 rating. Who was champion? Stone Cold. The worst rating ever was a 1.5 and who was champion then? Psycho Sid. This is no coincidence.

Basically what I'm saying is this. When Austin was champion, ratings would never ever fall below 3.8, let alone Sids 1.5 or Punks 2.5.

I can't believe people still blame the three hours. Do you know that WCW best ratings ever were three hour Nitros?

But if you really wanna blame the three hours, then just go ahead and look at the first two hour ratings and exclude the third hour from the overall rating.

Last edited by murder; 12-01-2012 at 06:51 AM.
murder is offline  
post #8225 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-01-2012, 06:56 AM
In Jericho, we trust
 
-Skullbone-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: G'day!
Posts: 2,174
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by murder View Post
Ok, I agree to an extent. But let's look at the best and worst raw rating of all time.

The best was on May 10th 1999, a 8.1 rating. Who was champion? Stone Cold. The worst rating ever was a 1.5 and who was champion then? Psycho Sid. This is no coincidence.

Basically what I'm saying is this. If Austin was champion, never ever did the ratings fall below 3.8, let alone a 1.5.

I can#t believe people still blame the three hours. Do you know that WCW best ratings ever were all three hour Nitros?

But if you really wanna blame the three hours, then just go ahead and look at the first two hour ratings and exclude the third hour from the overall rating.
But look at what the three hour trends produce nowadays. Nothing's drawing in big viewership numbers as a solo act (although Ryback has looked promising in sparking a growth in several instances) but you have a steep decline in many, many instances as the show ticks on which makes things even worse.

Be honest with yourself: can you watch a three hour Raw show nowadays? Can you honestly compare it to WCW's yesteryear in cultural context, product excitement, as well as your personal tastes at the time? The quantity of time is extraordinarily hefty for a weekly show, and the quality is going to have to be equally extraordinary, which it is not.
-Skullbone- is offline  
post #8226 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-01-2012, 07:00 AM
Working on my abs
 
The Cynical Miracle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: u.k
Posts: 2,997
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

WWE don't really care about ratings anyway. Punk isn't a ratings draw, yet he has been WWE champion for a year and has been the focal point of the show for about four months now.

The Cynical Miracle is offline  
post #8227 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-01-2012, 07:01 AM
Asking Meltzer to rate my matches
 
Duke Silver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by murder View Post
Ok, I agree to an extent. But let's look at the best and worst raw rating of all time.

The best was on May 10th 1999, a 8.1 rating. Who was champion? Stone Cold. The worst rating ever was a 1.5 and who was champion then? Psycho Sid. This is no coincidence.

Basically what I'm saying is this. When Austin was champion, ratings would never ever fall below 3.8, let alone Sids 1.5 or Punks 2.5.

I can't believe people still blame the three hours. Do you know that WCW best ratings ever were three hour Nitros?

But if you really wanna blame the three hours, then just go ahead and look at the first two hour ratings and exclude the third hour from the overall rating.
Comparisons are great but those examples have little significance or meaning in this day and age.

Austin was STONE COLD STEVE FUCKING AUSTIN (GOAT) and champion during the Attiude era. He was surrounded by superstars and epic booking. It was the most popular era in wrestling history.

Likewise, three hour Nitro's aired during the most successful era in wrestling history.

Sid was champion at the end of the weakest period in wrestling history. The roster was awful, booking was terrible, and there was little star power.

This is 2012. Wrestling is in a down-swing, there's no one with name value on the roster, booking is in the shitter, there are a thousand different ways to watch Monday Night Raw, and whether you believe it or not, the move to three hours is certainly a contributing factor. Plus championships don't draw anymore, and Punk obviously isn't lighting the world on fire. There's any number of reasons that ratings are down.

Last edited by Duke Silver; 12-01-2012 at 07:06 AM.
Duke Silver is offline  
post #8228 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-01-2012, 07:03 AM
TONY IN DECEMBER!
 
Jason Garretts Nightmare Before Christmas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Big D
Posts: 10,976
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Hands View Post
Yeah, the champ should never be in such a low-rated segment. But, man, what a shitty time for anyone to be an unproven champ. There is literally no one there to make him the star he needs to be.
Hunter should have done the job.



Quote:
Originally Posted by mattb425 from THE BOARD
Mid-Atlantic is The Godfather, New Japan is The Shawshank Redemption, ECW is Pulp Fiction, WCW is the Mass Effect video game series, and TNA is 2 Girls 1 Cup.
Jason Garretts Nightmare Before Christmas is offline  
post #8229 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-01-2012, 07:08 AM
TONY IN DECEMBER!
 
Jason Garretts Nightmare Before Christmas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Big D
Posts: 10,976
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jblvdx View Post
WWE don't really care about ratings anyway. Punk isn't a ratings draw, yet he has been WWE champion for a year and has been the focal point of the show for about four months now.
Only because Rock wants to work with him so you can credit Punks entire reign to dwayne.



Quote:
Originally Posted by mattb425 from THE BOARD
Mid-Atlantic is The Godfather, New Japan is The Shawshank Redemption, ECW is Pulp Fiction, WCW is the Mass Effect video game series, and TNA is 2 Girls 1 Cup.

Last edited by Jason Garretts Nightmare Before Christmas; 12-01-2012 at 07:11 AM.
Jason Garretts Nightmare Before Christmas is offline  
post #8230 of 9175 (permalink) Old 12-01-2012, 07:30 AM
Carrying SCOTT STEINER's bags
 
Shawn Morrison's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,528
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
               
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jblvdx View Post
WWE don't really care about ratings anyway. Punk isn't a ratings draw, yet he has been WWE champion for a year and has been the focal point of the show for about four months now.
because Rock vs Punk and a one year long reign makes more entertaining storylines. Also who really could have been given the belt? The only options were Cena and Ryback. Cena winning the title again needs to be special and a big thing, a random title win for him at point of his career is just pointless. Ryback could have won it too, but its too early, and why ruin a perfectly long reign of Cm Punk?

What sounds better on paper: Rock vs Punk (who just won the title back by cheating against Ryback)

OR

Rock vs Punk (the one year long champion who has beaten pretty much everyone in the roster)

Not Removing Until:

John Cena faces Undertaker at Wrestlemania [ ]

Sheamus and Cm Punk are the 2 World Champions [X] -Wrestlemania 28

John Morrison wins World Title [ ]

John Cena losses cleanly [X]- Wrestlemania 28 Rock Beats John Cena


John Cena turns heel [ ]

Shawn Michaels returns for One More Match[ ]

Daniel Bryan beats a Main Eventer cleanly [ ]

BTB:
http://www.wrestlingforum.com/booker...l#post10519764
Shawn Morrison is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome