View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
|
|
Wrestlers Draw
|
 
|
251 |
39.53% |
|
WWE Brand draws
|
 
|
384 |
60.47% |
| Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|
11-28-2012, 07:48 PM
|
#8171 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 12
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
The WWE is quite literally one of the worst things on TV at the moment (that I know of), so getting 3 million + people to tune in every week is still impressive.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-28-2012, 07:49 PM
|
#8172 (permalink)
|
|
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto.
Posts: 4,899
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Wrestlingforum Ratings logic: Ignore fact that show is 180 minutes long, and writing is less than mediocre. Blame it on one person because LULZ I HATE HIM.
Much love for this thread.
__________________

best.
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 07:54 PM
|
#8173 (permalink)
|
|
Little Poppa Pump
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,338
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrestlinfan35
Wrestlingforum Ratings logic: Ignore fact that show is 180 minutes long, and writing is less than mediocre. Blame it on one person because LULZ I HATE HIM.
Much love for this thread.
|
People will just call you a CM Punk mark because of your sig.
And I do agree though with what you said. The only reason people blame Punk is because they don't like him. No, it's not the fact that 3 hour RAWs have historically done poorer in ratings and maybe 3 hours every week is making people burn out of watching because it is too much for some people.
A 2.7 isn't a bad rating, especially for a 3 hour show.
__________________
Quote:
Professional wrestling is a television show.
Unnecessary flips and choreographed spots does not equal good wrestling.
TNA's current product is like someone trying to sell a type-writer in 2013.
Ryback: "Wrestling's fans in general are negative, alot of them."
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 07:57 PM
|
#8174 (permalink)
|
|
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 555 Centaur Dr.
Posts: 4,026
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrestlinfan35
Wrestlingforum Ratings logic: Ignore fact that show is 180 minutes long, and writing is less than mediocre. Blame it on one person because LULZ I HATE HIM.
Much love for this thread.
|
Ratings and shit like that are rarely the fault or because of one particular person. This includes when times are good. There's nothing happening on RAW. It wouldn't matter who the champion is, or where the show is, if there's nothing that's "must see" about it, nobody will watch it.
Things need to change. I mean serious change. I mean serious and significant change. Changing the champion will move the needle a bit maybe but it still won't be anything special. The audience just isn't there anymore and the show is doesn't have anything noteworthy anymore.
the days of 10 million people watching wrestling is dead. 3 million is good but nothing compared to 10, people need to realize...can't NOBODY bring that audience back.
Only thing you can do is try new things and change it up.
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 07:58 PM
|
#8175 (permalink)
|
|
Drafted to Monday Night RAW
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,665
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
If Vince really want a rating he should just insert this Punk and Ryback fued into the Cena and AJ love story, make AJ kiss all of them. Love stories = rating. Oh and having Big Show cry in the ring = ratings as well.
Seriously though 3 hours is too much for the mediocre storylines they have going throughout the show.
__________________
The New Brothers of Destruction
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 07:59 PM
|
#8176 (permalink)
|
|
Little Poppa Pump
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,338
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonoaries
Ratings and shit like that are rarely the fault or because of one particular person. This includes when times are good. There's nothing happening on RAW. It wouldn't matter who the champion is, or where the show is, if there's nothing that's "must see" about it, nobody will watch it.
Things need to change. I mean serious change. I mean serious and significant change. Changing the champion will move the needle a bit maybe but it still won't be anything special. The audience just isn't there anymore and the show is doesn't have anything noteworthy anymore.
the days of 10 million people watching wrestling is dead. 3 million is good but nothing compared to 10, people need to realize...can't NOBODY bring that audience back.
Only thing you can do is try new things and change it up.
|
I don't think there was ever a time when WWE had 10 million viewers.
__________________
Quote:
Professional wrestling is a television show.
Unnecessary flips and choreographed spots does not equal good wrestling.
TNA's current product is like someone trying to sell a type-writer in 2013.
Ryback: "Wrestling's fans in general are negative, alot of them."
|
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 08:03 PM
|
#8177 (permalink)
|
|
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 555 Centaur Dr.
Posts: 4,026
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by itssoeasy23
I don't think there was ever a time when WWE had 10 million viewers.
|
I was exaggerating with the 10 million viewers, I have no idea what's the most they've ever had because ratings aren't important to me, I was sort of making a point that they will never go back to Attitude Era viewers...whatever that was.
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 08:07 PM
|
#8178 (permalink)
|
|
Drafted to Monday Night RAW
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,665
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Where is Rock316 when you need him lol.
I may be wrong but the highest was maybe around 8 million in the USA, but if you count other countries it might have been close to 10 million.
__________________
The New Brothers of Destruction
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 08:21 PM
|
#8179 (permalink)
|
|
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,850
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loader230
If Punk and Heyman are the most entertaining thing then why would you tune out by the third hour?
|
That's why I said 'if I was a casual'. They probably don't realise the potential of a Punk/Heyman segment and just give up on the show as a whole.
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 09:01 PM
|
#8180 (permalink)
|
|
All In
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 4,247
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
People still give a shit about the ratings?  no wonder i never come in this thread, it's full of idiots.
__________________
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|