You know what Punk's smelling in your sig? BUTTHURT.
he is right tho, there will be a time where Rock, Taker, Triple H, Cena, Punk, heck even freaking Ryback (who is almost as old as cena/punk) won't be there anymore, and the supposedly up and coming current stars like ziggler, Barret, rhodes, Sandow, don't get the proper booking, push and story lines they deserve, they can't keep trusting the whole show to a bunch of part timers at best for the rest of their career to keep pushing ratings and buys
like Walk-in said, If WWE treats someone like they are not a star, why will the fans think they are a star?, that's why recently most IWC members are happy at the inclution of Ambrose, Rollins and Roman reigns in the WWE landscape, and we are expecting, almost praying they don't fuck this up, these 3 guys and mostly Ambrose and Rollins are the long future of the WWE, and if they screw this up (which us, being the negative nancies that we are, think they will) it speaks volumes that WWE can't do shit and they don't care anymore about the product itself
and like most people here said, sure, the WWE belt could change hands from punk to ryback, or heck, the minute rock gets it, but what will happen when that doesn't draw either?, will Punk Haters still blame punk for the low draw rates? (obviously they will, they are stupid that way), or will they finally accept that the whole product is crap and it's not helping their stars to be in such a mess of booking/storyline mediocrity?