View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
|
|
Wrestlers Draw
|
 
|
251 |
39.53% |
|
WWE Brand draws
|
 
|
384 |
60.47% |
| Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|
11-07-2012, 05:18 PM
|
#7621 (permalink)
|
|
1905. 1921. 1922. 1933. 1954. 2010. 2012.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: At AT&T Park at Third and King in San Francisco, watching the franchise with 66 representatives in the Major League Baseball Hall of Fame, 11 more than any other baseball team.
Posts: 10,043
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
IncapableNinja's 12 Angry Men signature is perfect for this thread!
I can see it now...
HENRY FONDA
Guys... Guys... I think it's a little bit unreasonable to solely blame CM Punk for WWE's ratings woes.
LEE J. COBB
Nonsense! HE'S GUILTY! YOU KNOW HE'S GUILTY!
HENRY FONDA
We don't know that! Besides, WWE treated him like he was a lowly midcarder his whole WWE Championship reign until Duh-wayne showed up back in July for that big episode thingamaging thingy.
LEE J. COBB
No! No! You know that kind! You know that they're rotten. That kid, Punk... You're letting him slip through our fingers!
JACK KLUGMAN
Guys, calm down! I think HENRY has a point, but I need to see the quarter hours... I think Punk's guilt is completely dependent on whether or not--
LEE J. COBB
No! NO! FONDA is letting him slip through our fingers and I won't have it!
HENRY FONDA
You sound like you want to be Punk's executioner! You're sick! You're a sadist! You probably liked the Spirit Squad/DX feud! You probably defended Mr. Kennedy's face turn! You probably hated Smackdown in the summer of 2009, you monster!
E.G. MARSHALL
Let's not lose our heads. Let's think rationally. I don't think Punk's helping matters, but FONDA does present a good point that WWE left him disenfranchised for a long, long period of time. You could argue with compelling facts that Punk was, to a major degree, set up to fail. But that doesn't mean he's helping matters, either, because he clearly isn't.
(Starbuck is E.G. MARSHALL.)
__________________
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-07-2012, 06:25 PM
|
#7622 (permalink)
|
|
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 682
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Only about 13 comments since the ratings were posted a few days ago. Even the ratings thread is failing to draw now.
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 07:44 PM
|
#7623 (permalink)
|
|
Carrying SCOTT STEINER's bags
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,874
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRainKing
Only about 13 comments since the ratings were posted a few days ago. Even the ratings thread is failing to draw now.
|
I just think many many fans are getting too disenfranchised with this company to bother as much anymore. You can only keep up energy for so long before such terrible products sap you to the point you just can't say much anymore. And really, it's gotten to the point no one guy can clearly be blamed outside of McMahon for the ratings turmoil.
__________________
Wrestling fan first... company fan last. Nothing worst than the fan that is loyal to the brand first and the wrestling second.
Ahhhh... late night strolls through the forum with my booze. Here's to finding out what the hell I did the next day!
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 07:51 PM
|
#7624 (permalink)
|
|
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,429
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Breakdown
Quote:
In the segment-by-segment, Rey Mysterio & Sin Cara & R-Truth vs. Titus O’Neil & Darren Young & Antonio Cesaro and the beginning of John Cena and Vickie Guerrero in the ring gained 313,000 viewers, which is really strong.
The rest of the Cena/Guerrero stuff and Daniel Bryan vs. Cody Rhodes lost 56,000 viewers.
Kane vs. Damien Sandow lost 36,000 viewers.
The Brad Maddox interview where Vince McMahon came out with Vickie Guerrero to change Survivor Series gained 341,000 viewers in the 9 p.m. slot which is no more than it usually would gain at that time.
Sheamus vs. The Miz lost 355,000 viewers.
Backstage stuff with Dolph Ziggler, C.M. Punk and Vickie Guerrero and William Regal and Sheamus lost 190,000 viewers.
Eve Torres & Aksana vs. Layla & Kaitlyn gained 96,000 viewers.
Alberto Del Rio vs. Kofi Kingston put at 10 p.m. lost 49,000 viewers at 10 p.m. which used to never happen.
Santino Marella & Zack Ryder vs. Primo & Epico and Wade Barrett vs. Brodus Clay lost 179,000 viewers.
Heath Slater vs. Jey Uso lost 167,000 viewers to a show low 2.48 quarter.
John Cena & Ryback vs. Dolph Ziggler & C.M. Punk gained 1,084,000 viewers to a 3.22 overrun. So the idea of Cena & Ryback as a team was a huge hit.
|
that is like the 4th time the 10pm has lost viewers this year and like the 3rd time with Del Rio
DAT OVERRUN
__________________
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 07:56 PM
|
#7625 (permalink)
|
|
FEAR THE BROCKTAGON
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 5,308
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Divas match/segment finally gained viewers. Its a miracle
__________________
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 08:06 PM
|
#7626 (permalink)
|
|
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 1,500
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by JY57
Divas match/segment finally gained viewers. Its a miracle
|
You mean like divas in signatures for rep. Oh wait!
__________________
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 08:21 PM
|
#7627 (permalink)
|
|
BROCKTAGON
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 16,751
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
@ Deso -
Things are so bad even the ratings don't draw anymore.
__________________
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 08:29 PM
|
#7628 (permalink)
|
|
Characters Welcome
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Manchester UK/Los Angeles
Posts: 1,317
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Starbuck
Things are so bad even the ratings don't draw.
|
Folks are missing my graphs. 
__________________
WWE unendingly projects just one scenery.
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 09:47 PM
|
#7629 (permalink)
|
|
It's only after you've lost everything that you're free to do anything.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,757
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
The divas gained? I actually let out a what the fuck on that one...
__________________
|
|
|
11-07-2012, 09:57 PM
|
#7630 (permalink)
|
|
Gamblin' Lives, One Day At A Time
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYS
Posts: 10,676
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Another great overrun for CM Punk, The Cult of Personality, The Voice of the Voiceless, and the Straight-Edge Savior. He's just a fucking ratings machine who can't be stopped. You put him in the overrun and numbers will sore above what the other hacks on the roster are bringing them down to.
In Punk we trust.
Quote:
IncapableNinja's 12 Angry Men signature is perfect for this thread!
I can see it now...
HENRY FONDA
Guys... Guys... I think it's a little bit unreasonable to solely blame CM Punk for WWE's ratings woes.
LEE J. COBB
Nonsense! HE'S GUILTY! YOU KNOW HE'S GUILTY!
HENRY FONDA
We don't know that! Besides, WWE treated him like he was a lowly midcarder his whole WWE Championship reign until Duh-wayne showed up back in July for that big episode thingamaging thingy.
LEE J. COBB
No! No! You know that kind! You know that they're rotten. That kid, Punk... You're letting him slip through our fingers!
JACK KLUGMAN
Guys, calm down! I think HENRY has a point, but I need to see the quarter hours... I think Punk's guilt is completely dependent on whether or not--
LEE J. COBB
No! NO! FONDA is letting him slip through our fingers and I won't have it!
HENRY FONDA
You sound like you want to be Punk's executioner! You're sick! You're a sadist! You probably liked the Spirit Squad/DX feud! You probably defended Mr. Kennedy's face turn! You probably hated Smackdown in the summer of 2009, you monster!
E.G. MARSHALL
Let's not lose our heads. Let's think rationally. I don't think Punk's helping matters, but FONDA does present a good point that WWE left him disenfranchised for a long, long period of time. You could argue with compelling facts that Punk was, to a major degree, set up to fail. But that doesn't mean he's helping matters, either, because he clearly isn't.
(Starbuck is E.G. MARSHALL.)
|
Can I be Fonda? 
__________________
Grabbing mothers around the world with neon claws since 1993.
Last edited by Gamblor : 11-07-2012 at 10:00 PM.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|