View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
|
|
Wrestlers Draw
|
  
|
251 |
39.53% |
|
WWE Brand draws
|
  
|
384 |
60.47% |
| Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|
10-23-2012, 04:19 PM
|
#7211 (permalink)
|
|
Drafted to Monday Night RAW
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,695
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
The 9pm hour still does the highest. I think Team Hell No literally took over that whole hour, to kill time. I think it was Ziggler vs Daniel Bryan, then Kane vs Big Show then the Game show stuff.
__________________
The New Brothers of Destruction
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 04:19 PM
|
#7212 (permalink)
|
|
Characters Welcome
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Manchester UK/Los Angeles
Posts: 1,317
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTFWWE
|
That was a holiday edition of MNR and generally aren't counted when considering trends etc.
Also the Nielsen number of households which calculates the rating has been changed since July 2011. They also take into account the number of people watching television on a particular night.
__________________
WWE unendingly projects just one scenery.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 04:21 PM
|
#7213 (permalink)
|
|
Drafted to Monday Night RAW
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,695
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTFWWE
|
Its due to three hours, the rating would have been much lower if it was only 2 hours at 3.5 million viewers.
__________________
The New Brothers of Destruction
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 04:21 PM
|
#7214 (permalink)
|
|
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,250
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Welcome to the 2.5 territory. Breaking records every week.
__________________
I do have one question for anyone who might feel that Dwayne Johnson "owes" the business. Is it just him, or is it anyone who moved on to other things? Should Luna Vachon get heat for running a towing company instead of working on RAW? Should Maven be critiqued on his Home Shopping Network bits instead of wrestling?
Or is it only the ones who go on to highly visible careers in movies that owe something? Why do Johnson (who left after putting people over, doing the traditionally "right thing") and Lesnar (who did not; except for making Eddie a legitimate star) get called sell-outs who "forgot where they came from" when someone who retires to do some regular job get credit (as they should) for moving on and making it without falling into a sea of addiction?
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 04:25 PM
|
#7215 (permalink)
|
|
Working on my abs
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,642
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Hey, at least the ratings were consistent throughout all hours, which means that most casuals have watched something else while the 3.5 million fans, of which most are regular ones, have kept watching this week.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 04:25 PM
|
#7216 (permalink)
|
|
Celebrating my first World title
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 12,527
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
They should be celebrating with the 2.5, lol. I expected a lot less as did many others. (probably Vince included) Or maybe it's because 2.5 is the new standard...
__________________
Credit goes to The Fourth Wall
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 04:55 PM
|
#7217 (permalink)
|
|
S. H. I. E. L. D
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 16,768
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by holt_hogan
I think it shows that no matter what the competition is or how relatively bad the show is 3.5 million is the number of fans who will tune in no matter what's going on. That's their inner core audience that are currently remaining loyal. If they start dipping below the 3.5 million, or 2.5 rating that's when they're entering troubled waters.
|
That number used to be 4.5 million not too long ago. They've already dropped a million. If they dip any further they really will be in troubled waters. This is better than I was expecting but still not good. Era of the 2s indeed. I wonder what will finally crack the 3.0 barrier and be considered a success lol. |
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 04:57 PM
|
#7218 (permalink)
|
|
Moron
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Currently UK
Posts: 52
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
The product sucks tbh. A 3 hours show is killing it, WWE has a thin roster. Very few can draw, so just turn it to a two hours show and stop this supershow BS. 3 hours show will only work if there is guys like Lesnar, Trips, Taker, Michaels, Rock etc. To help through out the show.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 04:59 PM
|
#7219 (permalink)
|
|
My Name Is God (I Hate You)
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: The Dregs Of Suburbia
Posts: 4,180
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redead
so basically, everyone? 
u mad ratings nerds?
 |
'worst ratings results ever! im never watchin the ratings thread ever again!!!111'
*one week later*
'they're gonna be so low lol'
__________________
Kill Your Boss
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2012, 05:04 PM
|
#7220 (permalink)
|
|
Passing the Popcorn
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Snoth's Cave
Posts: 1,279
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DesolationRow
Couldn't be bothered to even record Raw this week with GAME 7 this week and recording the debate on VHS as well. Go, GIANTS! National League Champions!
|
VHS? I didn't know VHS still existed.
__________________
ChampviaDQ
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
