**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 668 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums

View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?

Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

Old 10-03-2012, 08:03 PM   #6671 (permalink)
Moron
 
Pro Royka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 450
Pro Royka is in rep purgatory
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kokepepsi View Post
WOW
Wow is not enough.
Pro Royka is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 10-03-2012, 08:04 PM   #6672 (permalink)
Ho!
 
#BadNewsSanta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 14,157
#BadNewsSanta has posts worth reading#BadNewsSanta has posts worth reading#BadNewsSanta has posts worth reading#BadNewsSanta has posts worth reading#BadNewsSanta has posts worth reading#BadNewsSanta has posts worth reading#BadNewsSanta has posts worth reading#BadNewsSanta has posts worth reading#BadNewsSanta has posts worth reading#BadNewsSanta has posts worth reading#BadNewsSanta has posts worth reading
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falkono View Post
You may want to look at the numbers again. Sheamus segment was 2.77 and the final quarter with Punk was a 2.70.
When they say gain/loss they mean from the previous quarter. If a quarter has a high loss then a high gain looks great. But it isn't if you compare to the highest parts of the show. The highest point was a 2.9. Seeing as it started with a 2.7 its shows the peak of the show ascent much at all. An additional 200k.
Wait wait, how do you figure out Sheamus' segment got a 2.77? From what I got, both Sheamus segments were lower than all of Punk's segments. Am I missing something on the breakdown?

Quote:
Maybe or maybe not. He cant do worse than punk in the ratings, thats for sure.
Actually he can do a lot worse. There's a lot of numbers below the 3,500,000 or so Raw got.

Quote:
Yes it is Steve Austin's fault if the overall viewership/rating drops because people tuned in to see him particularly. He is the main guy that the show revolves around.


Okay, now I see there is no longer a point in arguing with you. I'm not going to get anywhere doing so if that's the type of "logic" you go by.
__________________
I've got some bad news...


Last edited by #BadNewsSanta : 10-03-2012 at 08:07 PM.
#BadNewsSanta is online now  
Old 10-03-2012, 08:06 PM   #6673 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Tnmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 586
Tnmore is an after thoughtTnmore is an after thought
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kokepepsi View Post
WOW
Explain?

Who's considered the face of Attitude ERA and who's credited for the success of Monday night ratings wars? Isnt it Steve Austin?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty Vibe View Post
Ha, I bet he could. Either way I couldn't give a shit. It's not going to happen so this is all completely redundant.
He probably could. He's massively over both the casuals and internet fans. If they dont fuck-up, he can be big.
__________________

Last edited by Tnmore : 10-03-2012 at 08:08 PM.
Tnmore is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 08:11 PM   #6674 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Tnmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 586
Tnmore is an after thoughtTnmore is an after thought
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Its simple really. If people are not willing to tune in to see your champion, buy PPVs on his name then tell me why this guy needs to remain the WWE champion.

You can blame the midcard all you want but the low viewership two weeks in a row, clearly proves Punk as WWE champion is a failed project.
__________________

Last edited by Tnmore : 10-03-2012 at 08:13 PM.
Tnmore is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 08:16 PM   #6675 (permalink)
My Name Is God (I Hate You)
 
Honey Bucket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Tits
Posts: 6,980
Honey Bucket is making a name for themselvesHoney Bucket is making a name for themselvesHoney Bucket is making a name for themselvesHoney Bucket is making a name for themselvesHoney Bucket is making a name for themselvesHoney Bucket is making a name for themselvesHoney Bucket is making a name for themselvesHoney Bucket is making a name for themselvesHoney Bucket is making a name for themselvesHoney Bucket is making a name for themselvesHoney Bucket is making a name for themselves
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tnmore View Post
Explain?

Who's considered the face of Attitude ERA and who's credited for the success of Monday night ratings wars? Isnt it Steve Austin?
Yeah you're right, so I guess The Rock, Vince McMahon, Shane McMahon, Mick Foley, The Undertaker, Kurt Angle, Triple H, Shawn Michaels, Edge and Christian, The Dudleys et al. had NOTHING to do with it.


Quote:
He probably could. He's massively over both the casuals and internet fans. If they dont fuck-up, he can be big.
At the moment he's just still in the nucleus stages of a 'monster' gimmick whose main claim to fame is having a stare-down with the WWE Champion. He hasn't had any mic time yet, hasn't had long enough matches and as far as I'm concerned, still has ALOT to learn. Absolutely no chance in hell.
__________________
If you type "Adolf Hitler was a fucking cunt" into Google using the speechmarks, you get two results over the entire internet. If you type in "Jeremy Kyle is a fucking cunt", you get 612. I can't do the maths, but that sounds about right.
Honey Bucket is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 08:20 PM   #6676 (permalink)
Getting over in the mid-card
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,968
GillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new here
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kokepepsi View Post
WOW
You know it's true. Nobody breaks down Smackdown's segment ratings. If Sheamus drew a 1.9 SD you're not rationalizing by saying well his segments had a 250,000 viewer increase.

You're just saying well Henry's averaged 2.3.

The focal point of the show will almost always draw in the most viewers.

In fairness to Punk though I don't think the decrease has much to do with him. It's the 3 hour format finally sinking in. It's just a chore to watch Raw nowadays.

Last edited by GillbergReturns : 10-03-2012 at 08:22 PM.
GillbergReturns is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 08:24 PM   #6677 (permalink)
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
Tnmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 586
Tnmore is an after thoughtTnmore is an after thought
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marty Vibe View Post
Yeah you're right, so I guess The Rock, Vince McMahon, Shane McMahon, Mick Foley, The Undertaker, Kurt Angle, Triple H, Shawn Michaels, Edge and Christian, The Dudleys et al. had NOTHING to do with it.
1998, Austin was The Man. 1999/2000 is different story. Ofcourse The Rock surpassed him completely and became the bigger star/draw/legend in the industry.


Quote:
At the moment he's just still in the nucleus stages of a 'monster' gimmick whose main claim to fame is having a stare-down with the WWE Champion. He hasn't had any mic time yet, hasn't had long enough matches and as far as I'm concerned, still has ALOT to learn. Absolutely no chance in hell.
Well I think we can agree on that, he's relatively new. But its gonna happen soon regardless t...t me, Vince is high on him and next year he would probably end up as champion.
__________________
Tnmore is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 08:29 PM   #6678 (permalink)
Moron
 
Pro Royka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 450
Pro Royka is in rep purgatory
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GillbergReturns View Post
You know it's true. Nobody breaks down Smackdown's segment ratings. If Sheamus drew a 1.9 SD you're not rationalizing by saying well his segments had a 250,000 viewer increase.

You're just saying well Henry's averaged 2.3.

The focal point of the show will almost always draw in the most viewers.

In fairness to Punk though I don't think the decrease has much to do with him. It's the 3 hour format finally sinking in. It's just a chore to watch Raw nowadays.
Raw is a supershow. SD guys are part of it, and we can see their drawing ability. I agree tho, SD should have somebody for the breakdowns.
Pro Royka is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 09:48 PM   #6679 (permalink)
Getting over in the mid-card
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,968
GillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new hereGillbergReturns better hope they're relatively new here
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro Royka View Post
Raw is a supershow. SD guys are part of it, and we can see their drawing ability. I agree tho, SD should have somebody for the breakdowns.
That wasn't my point.

On Smackdown overall numbers are the only thing that get judged but when it comes to judging Raw superstars they want to sweep it aside and just look at segment breakdowns.

Addressing your topic though, the Smackdown storyline is rarely the focal point of the show. Very rarely does anything significant happen to advance the World Heavyweight Championship storyline. No, I don't think Sheamus, Orton or insert Smackdown star should be held to the same ratings standards as Cena or Punk. For the most part it's just them killing time. Sheamus stealing ADR's car and Monday's debate are exceptions but we all know a random Orton v Tensai match is just worthless filler.

Last edited by GillbergReturns : 10-03-2012 at 09:51 PM.
GillbergReturns is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 10:57 PM   #6680 (permalink)
THE CONQUEROR
 
RatedR10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,570
RatedR10 probably won't be missedRatedR10 probably won't be missedRatedR10 probably won't be missedRatedR10 probably won't be missedRatedR10 probably won't be missedRatedR10 probably won't be missedRatedR10 probably won't be missedRatedR10 probably won't be missedRatedR10 probably won't be missedRatedR10 probably won't be missedRatedR10 probably won't be missed
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Holy shit at that breakdown.

Two surprises for me... 1) surprised Santino/Slater gained viewers to be honest. Wonder what led to that. 2) I know Del Rio isn't necessarily a ratings draw, but this guy is a former two time WWE Champion, MITB winner and the only 40 man Royal Rumble winner in history...and his match with Kofi Kingston loses nearly a million viewers. Absolutely terrible.
__________________
I'M A DEAN AMBROSE GUY


JOHN CENA - CONQUERED
RatedR10 is online now  
Closed Thread



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios