View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
|
|
Wrestlers Draw
|
 
|
251 |
39.53% |
|
WWE Brand draws
|
 
|
384 |
60.47% |
| Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|
10-02-2012, 08:34 PM
|
#6561 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 29
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Interesting fact
WCW got a 2.6 ten weeks before it died and it was going up against the WWF.
Not saying that the WWE is about to die though, I just wanted to put things into perspective.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
10-02-2012, 08:41 PM
|
#6562 (permalink)
|
|
HE'S FAT
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Locked in the TNA Asylum
Posts: 7,600
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
lol this is great news and nobody should be mad about this. I'm surprised they even get this with the crap they've been putting out over the years.
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 08:51 PM
|
#6563 (permalink)
|
|
Learning to break kayfabe
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 109
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Not suprised in the slightest. Put on a show that is utter shite, get utter shite ratings.
__________________
"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by sword, the other is by debt"
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:10 PM
|
#6564 (permalink)
|
|
Little Poppa Pump
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,075
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by roadkill_
No ab-libbing is allowed under the current strict regimen. Steve Austin himself would have a hard time flourishing under such tight bullshit (My guess is he woulda walked, probably to TNA where f-bombs have been heard several times past few months).
|
I doubt that is true. Its one of those Internet myths with no proof. I was listening to a CM punk interview from 2009, where he said he does a lot of ad-libbing in his promos. I think the real problem is lack of drive among the superstars to make it to the absolute top, as JR has pointed out many times in his interviews and blogs.
__________________
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:15 PM
|
#6565 (permalink)
|
|
Vince gives me a comedy gimmick
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 6,434
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
lol I haven't sat down and fully watched this shit of a show since RAW 1000. Sad to see how far its fallen in recent weeks. Nothing meaningful is going on.
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:16 PM
|
#6566 (permalink)
|
|
Carrying SCOTT STEINER's bags
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,898
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vyed
I doubt that is true. Its one of those Internet myths with no proof. I was listening to a CM punk interview from 2009, where he said he does a lot of ad-libbing in his promos. I think the real problem is lack of drive among the superstars to make it to the absolute top, as JR has pointed out many times in his interviews and blogs.
|
I think that is more along the lines of the absolute top guys have some pull to do their thing. We've heard numerous reports about guys like Ziggler ad libbing then getting berated for not sticking to script enough times that I don't think it is far off from teh truth. McMahon has gone iron fisted on the product. And maybe that is the real reason it's decaying... there is no organic feel to anything. It's all so mechanical for any of the few feuds or stories we have while everything else is just... there.
__________________
Wrestling fan first... company fan last. Nothing worst than the fan that is loyal to the brand first and the wrestling second.
Ahhhh... late night strolls through the forum with my booze. Here's to finding out what the hell I did the next day!
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:16 PM
|
#6567 (permalink)
|
|
Lacing SCOTT STEINER's boots
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: East of the Pacific Ocean, West of London, England, South of Mars, North of Hell
Posts: 4,249
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv95
2.5 is at Nitro 1999 and 2000-levels before and after Russo was fired. In fact it's worse than what they did, and they had Raw to compete with. Anyone remember how BORING Nitro was throughout 1999 post nWo/pre Russo and 2000 during the Sullivan Era? But at least they had starpower.
Yes 3-hours are a huge problem but even if they went back to the regular 2 it wouldn't make THAT much of a difference. They've gotten 2s before the 3-hour switch. Despite some potential in one or 2 guys the rest of the show and product is a complete mess. Cena isn't gonna save it, JBL back full-time won't save it, TV-14 won't save it (see 2007). It needs a revamp. Trim the fat and get rid of the guys who aren't ready/waste space and bring in guys who clearly are and push them. Enforce the brand split or just abolish it already and have one world champ. Turn guys heel/face who are long overdue. Focus on a more serious product instead of pointless comedy. Give us a storyline that creates a buzz around the wrestling world(Nexus, Summer of Punk, Conspiracy) and follow through on it.
|
Oh I remember how boring Nitro was. During the Sullivan Era I think that the most unique concept invented was the Yappapi Indian Strap match.
I'll say this about Russo WCW-it was often illogical, stupid and poorly thought out, but it was never boring.
__________________
Bossy's Law-in any online wrestling discussion, inevitably someone will mention that Daniel Bryan is the best or better then someone/something else, even if Daniel Bryan has nothing to do with the discussion.
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:27 PM
|
#6568 (permalink)
|
|
GET MY BAGS
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9,314
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serious_frusting
Interesting fact
WCW got a 2.6 ten weeks before it died and it was going up against the WWF.
Not saying that the WWE is about to die though, I just wanted to put things into perspective.
|
WCW even on its last legs had a much bigger overall TV audience than WWE now. In the last few months and in general, they were always doing the 3.5/3.9 quarters in the first hour and then the 2.5/3.0- against RAW(only 00). The downfall below 3.0 only started in late 99 and even then they had plenty of weeks above it. They had a RAW one time in 11pm because of Tennis, Nitro that night drew a 4.0+. That was the same night of the War Games on TV IIRC, which was a big success. Point is, Nitro with no competition at its peak on their neck, would have done at least a 4.0+ every week.
Last edited by Rock316AE : 10-02-2012 at 09:45 PM.
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:38 PM
|
#6569 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Where Eagles Dare
Posts: 1,320
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Damn, TNA maintaining their core audience is looking pretty good now.
__________________
|
|
|
10-02-2012, 09:47 PM
|
#6570 (permalink)
|
|
It's only after you've lost everything that you're free to do anything.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,764
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vyed
I doubt that is true. Its one of those Internet myths with no proof. I was listening to a CM punk interview from 2009, where he said he does a lot of ad-libbing in his promos. I think the real problem is lack of drive among the superstars to make it to the absolute top, as JR has pointed out many times in his interviews and blogs.
|
There's been tons of things out there that say only a few superstars get to ad-lib, and those are the top guys. Former creative writers have also noted that Dolph Ziggler's gone off script a few times and every time he has, he's been punished for it in someway.
__________________
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|