**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 510 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #5091 of 9175 (permalink) Old 08-07-2012, 10:03 PM
Moron
 
Pro Royka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Amuroray View Post
Punk also had a match in the first hour.

Miz kane was on the last hour i think
Did they show the breakdown yet, No. Yeah it was in that last hour because Cena vs Bryan was invincible .
Pro Royka is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #5092 of 9175 (permalink) Old 08-07-2012, 10:09 PM
Know Your Worth
 
Alim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,724
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Happenstan View Post
WWE should have went with Bryan (C) vs Cena and Punk vs Heel Orton at Summerslam instead of Show vs Punk vs Cena. It might not garner better ratings but let's face it...with RAW going to 3 hours ratings were gonna drop anyway. At least we would be watching something new and exciting instead of re-hashing the past.
No way would WWE give away three first time ever matches on one show. (Punk/Orton wouldn't be the first time, but their first feud sucked so it doesn't count)

THERE IS ONLY ONE DIAMOND IN THE BUSINESS AND HIS NAME IS TITUS O'NEIL

Alim is offline  
post #5093 of 9175 (permalink) Old 08-07-2012, 10:09 PM
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
Jammy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Ladies, save the mark wars for after the breakdown. Jeez.
Jammy is offline  
post #5094 of 9175 (permalink) Old 08-08-2012, 02:47 AM
Little Poppa Pump
 
Vyed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,080
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                   
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
WWE Raw on Monday, August 6 scored a 3.08 rating for all three hours, the same rating as last week post-Raw 1,000. The standard two-hour rating was also identical with a 3.23 rating.

One difference was Raw's third hour declining from the second hour. Raw peaked with a 3.26 rating in the second hour (previous first hour) before declining to a 3.19 rating in the final hour. The extra first hour scored a 2.80 rating vs. a 2.79 rating last week.

-- Raw declined 130,000 (2.9 percent) in total viewers compared to last week. Raw averaged 4.37 million viewers for all three hours, which was the fewest average viewers for a full episode since June 4. For just the standard two hours, it was the fewest viewers since July 9.

Similar to the hour-by-hour ratings, Raw viewership peaked in the second hour and declined in the third hour. Raw averaged 4.07 million first hour viewers, topped out at 4.65 million second hour viewers, and dropped to 4.47 million third hour viewers.

The third hour of Raw registered the fewest final hour viewers since June 4, so Raw did not finish strong this week.

UPDATED INFO:

-- On cable TV Monday night, Raw ranked #2 in overall viewers behind "The Closer" on TNT. The show ranked #1 in all key male demographics.

The demographic ratings were very similar to last week's show. The only real change was one-tenth of a rating increase among males & adults 18-34.

-- Looking back to last year, the August 8, 2011 episode scored nearly the exact same rating for a two-hour show. The demographic ratings are also nearly identical for this week's three-hour Raw compared to last year's two-hour Raw. The only difference is recovery of teen male viewers in 2012 compared to the noticeable downturn this time last year.
They should have promoted Shawn/Lesnar appearance a week in advance. Dont know why it wasnt promoted. Cena/bryan Main event also should have been promoted in advance by Twitter or through the website or whatever.

Vyed is offline  
post #5095 of 9175 (permalink) Old 08-08-2012, 11:48 AM
AND YOU SHINE MY SHOES IF I WANT YOU TO
 
Rock316AE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9,547
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Another drop and that's because they were too stupid to promote that "BROOOCCK LESSNARRR!" is going to be there along with HBK in his hometown. In 80 video packages you can't even throw one commercial? Maybe they're trying to sabotage this program? If not I don't get it. You just say out of the blue that HBK is going to be there like it's happening every week, then bring out Brock without promoting him. Ridiculous.

As for the second hour doing the biggest. They should have saved the Big Show/Orton match, which is a big and fresh match that happened maybe 2-3 times to the third hour and then Lesnar/Heyman/HBK/HHH in the main event segment.
Rock316AE is offline  
post #5096 of 9175 (permalink) Old 08-08-2012, 11:55 AM
Little Poppa Pump
 
NearFall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Ireland
Posts: 2,309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

They spent 5 million for 28-30ish Lesnar appearances and don't advertise them. Lolwat Vince?



Thanks Punk

Quote:
Ryan Reeves ‏@Ryback22 2m
I call dibs on GTS, Pepsi Plunge and running knee in corner. I am sure Sheamus will take the rest.
NearFall is offline  
post #5097 of 9175 (permalink) Old 08-08-2012, 12:43 PM
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
Marv95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Near KOP, PA
Posts: 3,484
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
                 
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

I'm a tiny bit surprised. Thought the rating would drop from last week. And it's surprising that this show isn't routinely in the 2s with the bland product they put out week after week. Still NFL season's approaching...

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazegod99 View Post
You fucking politically correct morons are quick to defend WWE for every pussy ass decision they make, but complain about the show lacking attitude and intensity... SMH.
Right on!
Follow if you dare: https://twitter.com/LoneAdvMGL
Marv95 is offline  
post #5098 of 9175 (permalink) Old 08-08-2012, 02:56 PM
There is no duty we so much underrate as... being happy. -Robert Louis Stevenson
 
Funkmaster DROW the X-Mas Hero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Staying on Alcatraz for the Holidays
Posts: 12,508
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock316AE View Post
Another drop and that's because they were too stupid to promote that "BROOOCCK LESSNARRR!" is going to be there along with HBK in his hometown. In 80 video packages you can't even throw one commercial? Maybe they're trying to sabotage this program? If not I don't get it. You just say out of the blue that HBK is going to be there like it's happening every week, then bring out Brock without promoting him. Ridiculous.
I have to agree. No mention of Lesnar, Triple H or Shawn Michaels in any ads, nor the wwe.com preview, nor anywhere. I have no idea why they wouldn't plug the hell out of the three of them appearing. At least Michaels and Lesnar, since you can assume by extension Triple H will be there, too. Inexplicable.

Funkmaster DROW the X-Mas Hero is offline  
post #5099 of 9175 (permalink) Old 08-08-2012, 04:05 PM
$9.99
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20,016
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesolationRow View Post
I have to agree. No mention of Lesnar, Triple H or Shawn Michaels in any ads, nor the wwe.com preview, nor anywhere. I have no idea why they wouldn't plug the hell out of the three of them appearing. At least Michaels and Lesnar, since you can assume by extension Triple H will be there, too. Inexplicable.
VINCE. IS. A. RETARD.

I think that should suffice. Stupid, stupid, god damn fucking stupid. They haven't given any promotion to this match. At all. It's ridiculous.
BEST FOR CHRISTMAS is offline  
post #5100 of 9175 (permalink) Old 08-08-2012, 04:09 PM
Moron
 
Shock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: England
Posts: 8,811
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NearFall View Post
They spent 5 million for 28-30ish Lesnar appearances and don't advertise them. Lolwat Vince?
WWE doesn't know what they're doing in advance, that's the big problem. I guarantee you they had no idea if Brock was going to be on next weeks show when they had Raw 1001. They probably told Brock on Sunday "you're on Raw" because he would have had to make travel arrangements, but even then I doubt they knew how to use him until the show.
Shock is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome