**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 43 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #421 of 9175 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 07:07 PM
Wheel Man for SCOTT STEINER
 
Marv95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Near KOP, PA
Posts: 3,475
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
                 
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

They were in the 3s at worst when they went head to head with the BCS in years past so to put the blame on that is almost grasping for straws. LOL, Nitro towards its end got better numbers than that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazegod99 View Post
You fucking politically correct morons are quick to defend WWE for every pussy ass decision they make, but complain about the show lacking attitude and intensity... SMH.
Right on!
Follow if you dare: https://twitter.com/LoneAdvMGL

Last edited by Marv95; 01-10-2012 at 07:34 PM.
Marv95 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #422 of 9175 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 07:33 PM
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
             
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Cm Punk's title reign has to be the lowest rated since pre-attitude era days. I can't remember another champion having a string of ratings in the high 2s very low 3s...and that includes Alberto Del Rio's short reign
Fanboi101 is offline  
post #423 of 9175 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 07:43 PM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 78
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

punk cant draw
RKO299 is offline  
post #424 of 9175 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 07:44 PM
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Y2Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Sigh. You 12-year-old idiots. It's not Punk. It's WWE not really investing in any talent besides John Cena the last 5 years or so.

http://www.wrestlingforum.com/signaturepics/xsigpic192407_2.gif.pagespeed.ic.hqwkLY450d.jpg
Y2Joe is offline  
post #425 of 9175 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 07:57 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
GuruOfMarkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hyrule
Posts: 895
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Y2Joe View Post
Sigh. You 12-year-old idiots. It's not Punk. It's WWE not really investing in any talent besides John Cena the last 5 years or so.
I doubt analyzing Nielsen evidence about a professional wrestling program amounts to how stupid someone can be. Anyway this CM Punk thing is interesting. He can get the biggest pop of the night, he's arguably the face of the company, yet he loses viewers on a consistent basis. He's been put on every possible time slot on the show. You can like CM Punk, there is nothing wrong with that. But WWE is gonna have to consider pushing someone else if this continues. It's just business. Personally, Punk doesn't interest me enough to hate him as much as some folks do. The whole show sucks.

RAW: John Cena, Ryback, Daniel Bryan, Antonio Cesaro, Dolph Ziggler

SMACKDOWNRandy Orton, Christian, Wade Barrett, Damien Sandow, AJ Lee

IMPACT WRESTLING: AJ Styles, Austin Aries, Jeff Hardy, Bobby Roode, Bully Ray
GuruOfMarkness is offline  
post #426 of 9175 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 07:59 PM
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
Y2Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuruOfMarkness View Post
I doubt analyzing Nielsen evidence about a professional wrestling program amounts to how stupid someone can be. Anyway this CM Punk thing is interesting. He can get the biggest pop of the night, he's arguably the face of the company, yet he loses viewers on a consistent basis. He's been put on every possible time slot on the show. You can like CM Punk, there is nothing wrong with that. But WWE is gonna have to consider pushing someone else if this continues. It's just business. Personally, Punk doesn't interest me enough to hate him as much as some folks do. The whole show sucks.
CM Punk loses viewers on a consistent basis? Show me the quarter hours.

http://www.wrestlingforum.com/signaturepics/xsigpic192407_2.gif.pagespeed.ic.hqwkLY450d.jpg
Y2Joe is offline  
post #427 of 9175 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 08:01 PM
Where you at?
 
Jules Winnfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 3,501
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GuruOfMarkness View Post
I doubt analyzing Nielsen evidence about a professional wrestling program amounts to how stupid someone can be. Anyway this CM Punk thing is interesting. He can get the biggest pop of the night, he's arguably the face of the company, yet he loses viewers on a consistent basis. He's been put on every possible time slot on the show. You can like CM Punk, there is nothing wrong with that. But WWE is gonna have to consider pushing someone else if this continues. It's just business. Personally, Punk doesn't interest me enough to hate him as much as some folks do. The whole show sucks.
Be honest. CM Punk vs Jack Swagger? We know who's winning so why watch?

Jules Winnfield is offline  
post #428 of 9175 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 08:04 PM
Getting ignored by SCOTT STEINER
 
GuruOfMarkness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Hyrule
Posts: 895
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiZE View Post
Be honest. CM Punk vs Jack Swagger? We know who's winning so why watch?
The problem is this apparently happens every week. Jack Swagger vs anyone is not worth watching I admit though. But I'm not saying they need to throw Punk on Superstars and take his push, wrestling is about making money and Punk does that. But WWE makes most of it's money from tv licensing. The fact of the matter is whatever time slot they put him in it either loses viewers by a large amount or by a medium amount. They put Cena in the main event for 3 weeks, and it went back up. They shouldn't have to protect the WWE champion from getting bad ratings. If he's not hot, they gotta pull him back a bit and get the steam back.

RAW: John Cena, Ryback, Daniel Bryan, Antonio Cesaro, Dolph Ziggler

SMACKDOWNRandy Orton, Christian, Wade Barrett, Damien Sandow, AJ Lee

IMPACT WRESTLING: AJ Styles, Austin Aries, Jeff Hardy, Bobby Roode, Bully Ray
GuruOfMarkness is offline  
post #429 of 9175 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 08:26 PM
Humbled
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Surrounded by the morons on WF
Posts: 7,974
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
           
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by HGF View Post
Shame it got such a shit rating even though it was one of the most entertaining Raw's ever.
I know it's just your opinion but I can't even imagine myself agreeing with this. They've done much, much, better than this before and it's not even close imo.
Theproof is offline  
post #430 of 9175 (permalink) Old 01-10-2012, 08:29 PM
Still Real To Me, Dammit!
 
vague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Seems more like Cena's show these days than Punk's, honestly. His storyline with Kane is the main focus anyway. Punk's time gets cut more and more every week, so I don't see how you can pin this all on him. He's barely visible. Either way, I don't see how one guy can be blamed or praised for an entire rating. It just seems like RAW generally has a see-saw rating because it just isn't must see tv any more. It's casual viewing for many when nothing better is on. I think that says more about the product in general than anything. But whatever, a scapegoat is more convenient.
vague is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome