**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 35 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, ROH, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums

View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?

Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

Old 01-05-2012, 08:08 PM   #341 (permalink)
The Man With No Face
 
RandomRage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,511
RandomRage 2001 - 2500RandomRage 2001 - 2500RandomRage 2001 - 2500RandomRage 2001 - 2500RandomRage 2001 - 2500RandomRage 2001 - 2500RandomRage 2001 - 2500RandomRage 2001 - 2500RandomRage 2001 - 2500RandomRage 2001 - 2500RandomRage 2001 - 2500
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ketamine View Post
This exactly.
If anything gets banned around here, it needs to be people quoting posts with nothing else to add but "This."
__________________


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RandomRage is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 01-05-2012, 08:41 PM   #342 (permalink)
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
Fabregas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,628
Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brye View Post
And then I press the close button.

And my gripe is that wrestling 'fans' have changed to the point where the actual product has come second to the numbers it makes and I just find that ridiculous and I'd love to hear why people care so much. Plus I have to come into these threads anyway.
Why do you think that is? It's because the product sucks so much these days that some of us actually enjoy discussing ratings more than the actual show. And I'm not joking, I'm being dead serious. In fact I'm willing to bet that most of the people who enjoy the ratings threads are the ones who absolutely hate the current product. The ratings are the only thing we can relate to because it backs up our view that the product is terrible.

For the people who do somehow enjoy the current product, of course you don't care about ratings, why would you? I'm sure if I was a smark during the attitude era I wouldn't have cared about ratings either, because I would of been enjoying the show too much, i'd rather discuss storylines and my favourite wrestlers, and thats exactly what I did back then. So you see, this trend of people talking about ratings isn't a case of them caring more about ratings, its more a case of them NOT caring about the show.
__________________
"Imagine the worst situation - we lose Fabregas and Nasri. You cannot convince people you are ambitious after that. You cannot pretend you are a big club. A big club holds onto its big players and gives a message out to all the other big clubs that they just cannot come in and take [players] away from you." - Arsene Wenger

Last edited by Fabregas : 01-05-2012 at 08:48 PM.
Fabregas is offline  
Old 01-05-2012, 10:43 PM   #343 (permalink)
Will Always be a Snit Head
 
TaylorFitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 14,248
TaylorFitz 18501 - 19000TaylorFitz 18501 - 19000TaylorFitz 18501 - 19000TaylorFitz 18501 - 19000TaylorFitz 18501 - 19000TaylorFitz 18501 - 19000TaylorFitz 18501 - 19000TaylorFitz 18501 - 19000TaylorFitz 18501 - 19000TaylorFitz 18501 - 19000TaylorFitz 18501 - 19000
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabregas View Post
Why do you think that is? It's because the product sucks so much these days that some of us actually enjoy discussing ratings more than the actual show. And I'm not joking, I'm being dead serious. In fact I'm willing to bet that most of the people who enjoy the ratings threads are the ones who absolutely hate the current product. The ratings are the only thing we can relate to because it backs up our view that the product is terrible.

For the people who do somehow enjoy the current product, of course you don't care about ratings, why would you? I'm sure if I was a smark during the attitude era I wouldn't have cared about ratings either, because I would of been enjoying the show too much, i'd rather discuss storylines and my favourite wrestlers, and thats exactly what I did back then. So you see, this trend of people talking about ratings isn't a case of them caring more about ratings, its more a case of them NOT caring about the show.
So you use the fact that 4 million people watch Raw every week to back up your opinion that the show sucks? Seems kind of counter productive to me.
TaylorFitz is offline  
Old 01-06-2012, 03:03 AM   #344 (permalink)
SPICE/SWAG
 
swagger_ROCKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 20,645
swagger_ROCKS 24501 - 25000swagger_ROCKS 24501 - 25000swagger_ROCKS 24501 - 25000swagger_ROCKS 24501 - 25000swagger_ROCKS 24501 - 25000swagger_ROCKS 24501 - 25000swagger_ROCKS 24501 - 25000swagger_ROCKS 24501 - 25000swagger_ROCKS 24501 - 25000swagger_ROCKS 24501 - 25000swagger_ROCKS 24501 - 25000
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hazuki View Post
Nobody cares for Jack Swagger right now. Of course they are going to change the channel. You failed to mention he gained some of the audience back which is good. seriously guys, do you care this much about the ratings?
That's like me saying I am not going to watch a match between Lance Storm vs Rock because I don't like Lance Storm. Are you saying that Ziggles is the reason those viewers came back?
__________________

KARLA LOPEZ, THE HOTTEST MODEL/ACTRESS ALIVE. Sheamus, Swagger, Wade, Dixie, Cesaro, Sami, DB, RKO, Drew, Del Rio, Cody, Punk, AJ LEE / (LET SAMI ZAYN AND CESARO 2014 BEGIN!!!) CHAMPviaDQ = Great GFX. Lovely Danna Paola
swagger_ROCKS is offline  
Old 01-06-2012, 03:41 AM   #345 (permalink)
Drafted to Monday Night RAW
 
Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,331
Warrior 3501 - 4000Warrior 3501 - 4000Warrior 3501 - 4000Warrior 3501 - 4000Warrior 3501 - 4000Warrior 3501 - 4000Warrior 3501 - 4000Warrior 3501 - 4000Warrior 3501 - 4000Warrior 3501 - 4000Warrior 3501 - 4000
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Seriously close and ban ratings threads. These threads gets filled with spam and just pure smart assery based on dirt sheet reports. How about only allow them when there is a major difference in the ratings. For example RAW has been averaging 2.9 - 3.1 for the past few months. Then when ratings increase significantly like between 3.4 - 4.0 or drop to 2.3 - 2.5 then allow only one thread. Wrestling fans should enjoy the product for what it is and only let WWE officials worry about ratings. It is pointless arguing over ratings that stay consistent IMO.
Warrior is offline  
Old 01-06-2012, 05:43 AM   #346 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,111
Expectnomercy316 101 - 250Expectnomercy316 101 - 250
Default Re: RAW "ItBegins" Viewership (02/01/12) - no boost

Quote:
Originally Posted by hazuki View Post
How do you get this??? please help
Expectnomercy316 is offline  
Old 01-06-2012, 08:17 AM   #347 (permalink)
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
Fabregas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,628
Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000Fabregas 501 - 1000
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TaylorFitz View Post
So you use the fact that 4 million people watch Raw every week to back up your opinion that the show sucks? Seems kind of counter productive to me.
The number is getting lower and lower, thats what supports my opinion.
__________________
"Imagine the worst situation - we lose Fabregas and Nasri. You cannot convince people you are ambitious after that. You cannot pretend you are a big club. A big club holds onto its big players and gives a message out to all the other big clubs that they just cannot come in and take [players] away from you." - Arsene Wenger

Last edited by Fabregas : 01-06-2012 at 08:29 AM.
Fabregas is offline  
Old 01-06-2012, 09:50 AM   #348 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 109
Holyier 50 - 100
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

So jericho's return wasnt a success?
Holyier is offline  
Old 01-06-2012, 10:48 AM   #349 (permalink)
Learning to break kayfabe
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 106
LastDamnation 101 - 250LastDamnation 101 - 250
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

"Jericho segment lost viewers.
No more than usual they would lose at that segment.
About 80k viewers down.

First quarter with Cena was the highest rated quarter. Never good when the highest rated quarter is the first one.

Punk/Ziggler match did not do what it should have done, it gained viewers, but it should gain 500k, they gained close to 200k.

Punk does not move the ratings."

This is mainly the WWEs fault - the match was built up as the main event before and during the first half of the show, until the break before the match when it said up next - many people probably expected this match to close the show.
__________________
Not Removing Until (updated):

[ ] Wade Barrett becomes World Champion
[x] The Royal Rumble winner main events Wrestlemania

[X] Someone new wins WWE title
[ ] The obsession with singlets ends
[ ] Punk has a proper feud with Miz
[?] Brodus Clay becomes a monster
[ ] They get rid of MITB (or at least reduce it to just at WM)
LastDamnation is offline  
Old 01-06-2012, 12:17 PM   #350 (permalink)
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 109
Holyier 50 - 100
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by LastDamnation View Post
"Jericho segment lost viewers.
No more than usual they would lose at that segment.
About 80k viewers down.

First quarter with Cena was the highest rated quarter. Never good when the highest rated quarter is the first one.

Punk/Ziggler match did not do what it should have done, it gained viewers, but it should gain 500k, they gained close to 200k.

Punk does not move the ratings."

This is mainly the WWEs fault - the match was built up as the main event before and during the first half of the show, until the break before the match when it said up next - many people probably expected this match to close the show.
No it wasnt built as the main event. Laurinaitis announced The 6 man tag match half way through the show.
Holyier is offline  
Closed Thread



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios