**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 284 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, ROH, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums

View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?

Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

Old 05-06-2012, 11:35 AM   #2831 (permalink)
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Contrarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 355
Contrarian 101 - 250Contrarian 101 - 250
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dxbender View Post
WWEs did you know fact of the week....

Did you know that last weeks episode of Monday Night Raw was watched by more than twice the amount of viewers as UFC on Fox.

Source: http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/201...demayo/132623/
You do realise UFC Tv ratings have always been 1.0 ~ 1.2 right?

WWE RAW & UFC is not comparable as for as the TV ratings are considered.

Wrestling is not "healthy" btw, not in 2012. They are infact struggling. If the ratings drops below 2.5 on a consistent basis, they lose USA network.
Contrarian is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 05-06-2012, 11:47 AM   #2832 (permalink)
Little Poppa Pump
 
The Cynical Miracle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: u.k
Posts: 2,202
The Cynical Miracle 2501 - 3000The Cynical Miracle 2501 - 3000The Cynical Miracle 2501 - 3000The Cynical Miracle 2501 - 3000The Cynical Miracle 2501 - 3000The Cynical Miracle 2501 - 3000The Cynical Miracle 2501 - 3000The Cynical Miracle 2501 - 3000The Cynical Miracle 2501 - 3000The Cynical Miracle 2501 - 3000The Cynical Miracle 2501 - 3000
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Contrarian View Post
You do realise UFC Tv ratings have always been 1.0 ~ 1.2 right?

WWE RAW & UFC is not comparable as for as the TV ratings are considered.

Wrestling is not "healthy" btw, not in 2012. They are infact struggling. If the ratings drops below 2.5 on a consistent basis, they lose USA network.
But, its erm, not going to drop to that level as Raw is USA Networks highest rated show. So lol.
__________________
The Cynical Miracle is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 01:36 PM   #2833 (permalink)
SHIELD
Premium
 
ChromeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,865
ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

It's not the worst roster ever, but you can make a case for it being the worst booked roster ever.
__________________
GTA V!


ChromeMan is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 01:37 PM   #2834 (permalink)
Celebrating my first World title
 
dxbender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,324
dxbender 4501 - 5000dxbender 4501 - 5000dxbender 4501 - 5000dxbender 4501 - 5000dxbender 4501 - 5000dxbender 4501 - 5000dxbender 4501 - 5000dxbender 4501 - 5000dxbender 4501 - 5000dxbender 4501 - 5000dxbender 4501 - 5000
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChromeMan View Post
It's not the worst roster ever, but you can make a case for it being the worst booked roster ever.
Worst booked in WWE maybe(though 2006-2008 was worse in my mind) but WCW had way worse
__________________

Other Faves:The Rock,Edge,Jericho,Kaitlyn,McIntyre,Usos

WWE isn't in PG ERA, It's in REBUILDING ERA
dxbender is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 01:48 PM   #2835 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
rockymark94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,068
rockymark94 101 - 250rockymark94 101 - 250
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

I would say in terms of showing character and having charisma this is the worst roster in wwe history.

Last edited by rockymark94 : 05-06-2012 at 01:51 PM.
rockymark94 is offline  
Old 05-06-2012, 01:52 PM   #2836 (permalink)
SHIELD
Premium
 
ChromeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,865
ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500ChromeMan 1001 - 1500
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dxbender View Post
Worst booked in WWE maybe(though 2006-2008 was worse in my mind) but WCW had way worse
Yeah, I was thinking strictly WWE, but no doubt WCW was absolutely atrocious. Benoit, Malenko, Saturn, Guerrero, Jericho, Raven, Booker T, Buff Bagwell, the list goes on and on. So much talent wasted just to keep the old guys on top.
__________________
GTA V!


ChromeMan is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 12:25 AM   #2837 (permalink)
Moron
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 463
Hemen 50 - 100
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jblvdx View Post
But, its erm, not going to drop to that level as Raw is USA Networks highest rated show. So lol.
The ratings are not that high, they were higher in the attitude and ruthless agression era.

Well, the ratings have been dropping for a while, in 3 - 5 years i can see the ratings dropping to that level.
Hemen is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 12:55 AM   #2838 (permalink)
GET MY BAGS
 
Rock316AE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9,306
Rock316AE 14001 - 14500Rock316AE 14001 - 14500Rock316AE 14001 - 14500Rock316AE 14001 - 14500Rock316AE 14001 - 14500Rock316AE 14001 - 14500Rock316AE 14001 - 14500Rock316AE 14001 - 14500Rock316AE 14001 - 14500Rock316AE 14001 - 14500Rock316AE 14001 - 14500
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rockymark94 View Post
I would say in terms of showing character and having charisma this is the worst roster in wwe history.
Nah, this is the worst roster in the history of wrestling in every way. Even to things like real life attitude or carrying yourself like a star, nothing. Just a bunch of clueless, uncharismatic, untalented, default choices who think they're on a school trip. Miserable and embarrassing. The only full time stars, legit stars who are not physically huge like Show and Henry and can go into restaurant and turn heads are Cena and Orton. Then they're surprised when less kids are watching wrestling today than ever before? back then the wrestlers were like role models, the "I want to be like him" figure, now the kid is more "cool" than the wrestler, and don't start on the teenagers when the healthy bunch can kick 90% of the roster's ass.

The only reason WWE are with the head above water BTW, is just because of the TV deals, not the wrestling product because every aspect is almost all-time low, and most of them like PPV is at an all-time low. The minute they're dropping even more in the ratings to a regular 2.6-2.7, USA are throwing them out and they're going out of business, all that without talking about the next astronomical bomb which is the Network.

Last edited by Rock316AE : 05-07-2012 at 01:02 AM.
Rock316AE is online now  
Old 05-07-2012, 01:03 AM   #2839 (permalink)
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
 
Contrarian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 355
Contrarian 101 - 250Contrarian 101 - 250
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

WWE Network could be a success if they are smart enough to know what exactly the casuals want.
__________________
Contrarian is offline  
Old 05-07-2012, 01:25 AM   #2840 (permalink)
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
 
rockymark94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,068
rockymark94 101 - 250rockymark94 101 - 250
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock316AE View Post
Nah, this is the worst roster in the history of wrestling in every way. Even to things like real life attitude or carrying yourself like a star, nothing. Just a bunch of clueless, uncharismatic, untalented, default choices who think they're on a school trip. Miserable and embarrassing. The only full time stars, legit stars who are not physically huge like Show and Henry and can go into restaurant and turn heads are Cena and Orton. Then they're surprised when less kids are watching wrestling today than ever before? back then the wrestlers were like role models, the "I want to be like him" figure, now the kid is more "cool" than the wrestler, and don't start on the teenagers when the healthy bunch can kick 90% of the roster's ass.

The only reason WWE are with the head above water BTW, is just because of the TV deals, not the wrestling product because every aspect is almost all-time low, and most of them like PPV is at an all-time low. The minute they're dropping even more in the ratings to a regular 2.6-2.7, USA are throwing them out and they're going out of business, all that without talking about the next astronomical bomb which is the Network.
I would say WCW in 2000 or wwe in 1995 have the worst overall rosters or maybe the booking was just shitty. But then again WWE in 1995 had bret,owen,taker,hall,luger,diesel,yokozuna, bob backlund,etc. Whereas now they have Cena & Orton, Mysterio, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Indy midget hacks that can't draw
rockymark94 is offline  
Closed Thread



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios