View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
|
|
Wrestlers Draw
|
 
|
251 |
39.53% |
|
WWE Brand draws
|
 
|
384 |
60.47% |
| Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|
05-06-2012, 11:35 AM
|
#2831 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 355
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dxbender
|
You do realise UFC Tv ratings have always been 1.0 ~ 1.2 right?
WWE RAW & UFC is not comparable as for as the TV ratings are considered.
Wrestling is not "healthy" btw, not in 2012. They are infact struggling. If the ratings drops below 2.5 on a consistent basis, they lose USA network.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
05-06-2012, 11:47 AM
|
#2832 (permalink)
|
|
Little Poppa Pump
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: u.k
Posts: 2,202
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Contrarian
You do realise UFC Tv ratings have always been 1.0 ~ 1.2 right?
WWE RAW & UFC is not comparable as for as the TV ratings are considered.
Wrestling is not "healthy" btw, not in 2012. They are infact struggling. If the ratings drops below 2.5 on a consistent basis, they lose USA network.
|
But, its erm, not going to drop to that level as Raw is USA Networks highest rated show. So lol.
__________________
|
|
|
05-06-2012, 01:36 PM
|
#2833 (permalink)
|
|
SHIELD
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,865
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
It's not the worst roster ever, but you can make a case for it being the worst booked roster ever.
|
|
|
05-06-2012, 01:37 PM
|
#2834 (permalink)
|
|
Celebrating my first World title
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,324
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChromeMan
It's not the worst roster ever, but you can make a case for it being the worst booked roster ever.
|
Worst booked in WWE maybe(though 2006-2008 was worse in my mind) but WCW had way worse
__________________

Other Faves:The Rock,Edge,Jericho,Kaitlyn,McIntyre,Usos
WWE isn't in PG ERA, It's in REBUILDING ERA
|
|
|
05-06-2012, 01:48 PM
|
#2835 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,068
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
I would say in terms of showing character and having charisma this is the worst roster in wwe history.
Last edited by rockymark94 : 05-06-2012 at 01:51 PM.
|
|
|
05-06-2012, 01:52 PM
|
#2836 (permalink)
|
|
SHIELD
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,865
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dxbender
Worst booked in WWE maybe(though 2006-2008 was worse in my mind) but WCW had way worse
|
Yeah, I was thinking strictly WWE, but no doubt WCW was absolutely atrocious. Benoit, Malenko, Saturn, Guerrero, Jericho, Raven, Booker T, Buff Bagwell, the list goes on and on. So much talent wasted just to keep the old guys on top.
|
|
|
05-07-2012, 12:25 AM
|
#2837 (permalink)
|
|
Moron
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 463
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jblvdx
But, its erm, not going to drop to that level as Raw is USA Networks highest rated show. So lol.
|
The ratings are not that high, they were higher in the attitude and ruthless agression era.
Well, the ratings have been dropping for a while, in 3 - 5 years i can see the ratings dropping to that level.
|
|
|
05-07-2012, 12:55 AM
|
#2838 (permalink)
|
|
GET MY BAGS
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9,306
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockymark94
I would say in terms of showing character and having charisma this is the worst roster in wwe history.
|
Nah, this is the worst roster in the history of wrestling in every way. Even to things like real life attitude or carrying yourself like a star, nothing. Just a bunch of clueless, uncharismatic, untalented, default choices who think they're on a school trip. Miserable and embarrassing. The only full time stars, legit stars who are not physically huge like Show and Henry and can go into restaurant and turn heads are Cena and Orton. Then they're surprised when less kids are watching wrestling today than ever before? back then the wrestlers were like role models, the "I want to be like him" figure, now the kid is more "cool" than the wrestler, and don't start on the teenagers when the healthy bunch can kick 90% of the roster's ass.
The only reason WWE are with the head above water BTW, is just because of the TV deals, not the wrestling product because every aspect is almost all-time low, and most of them like PPV is at an all-time low. The minute they're dropping even more in the ratings to a regular 2.6-2.7, USA are throwing them out and they're going out of business, all that without talking about the next astronomical bomb which is the Network.
Last edited by Rock316AE : 05-07-2012 at 01:02 AM.
|
|
|
05-07-2012, 01:03 AM
|
#2839 (permalink)
|
|
Asking SCOTT STEINER for Wrestling Advice
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 355
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
WWE Network could be a success if they are smart enough to know what exactly the casuals want.
__________________
|
|
|
05-07-2012, 01:25 AM
|
#2840 (permalink)
|
|
Acknowledged by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,068
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock316AE
Nah, this is the worst roster in the history of wrestling in every way. Even to things like real life attitude or carrying yourself like a star, nothing. Just a bunch of clueless, uncharismatic, untalented, default choices who think they're on a school trip. Miserable and embarrassing. The only full time stars, legit stars who are not physically huge like Show and Henry and can go into restaurant and turn heads are Cena and Orton. Then they're surprised when less kids are watching wrestling today than ever before? back then the wrestlers were like role models, the "I want to be like him" figure, now the kid is more "cool" than the wrestler, and don't start on the teenagers when the healthy bunch can kick 90% of the roster's ass.
The only reason WWE are with the head above water BTW, is just because of the TV deals, not the wrestling product because every aspect is almost all-time low, and most of them like PPV is at an all-time low. The minute they're dropping even more in the ratings to a regular 2.6-2.7, USA are throwing them out and they're going out of business, all that without talking about the next astronomical bomb which is the Network.
|
I would say WCW in 2000 or wwe in 1995 have the worst overall rosters or maybe the booking was just shitty. But then again WWE in 1995 had bret,owen,taker,hall,luger,diesel,yokozuna, bob backlund,etc. Whereas now they have Cena & Orton, Mysterio, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Indy midget hacks that can't draw
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|