**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 255 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #2541 of 9175 (permalink) Old 04-18-2012, 07:26 PM
Moron
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by itssoeasy23 View Post


wat so funny? do u think i a buffooon? its true
choosedoodle22 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2542 of 9175 (permalink) Old 04-18-2012, 07:29 PM
Little Poppa Pump
 
Fargerov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,327
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                 
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrestlinfan35 View Post
Right, why is that funny? It isn't, in fact it's pretty sad. He's a UFC draw, not a WWE draw. But that's judging by TV numbers. Can't say much until we know the ER number.
He's not waste of time because he is a good wrestler and is entertaining. He may be a waste of money for WWE, but a waste of time, no.

Fargerov is offline  
post #2543 of 9175 (permalink) Old 04-18-2012, 07:37 PM
Vince gives me a comedy gimmick
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto.
Posts: 6,187
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fargerov View Post
He's not waste of time because he is a good wrestler and is entertaining. He may be a waste of money for WWE, but a waste of time, no.
Good wrestler, yes. Entertaining, eh depends on who you ask. I don't think he's even a bit entertaining. Even so, he's a special attraction. If that was not the case and he became a full time guy, then I wouldn't consider it waste of time. Still a waste of money, though. Instead of focusing on making new stars, they rely on old ones to fight Cena. But so far, Lesnar's a special attraction that clearly isn't working too well. He's gained almost no publicity for returning to WWE, and his segments are trash in terms of ratings. The Rock was a successful special attraction, Lesnar not so much.






best.

Wrestlinfan35 is offline  
post #2544 of 9175 (permalink) Old 04-18-2012, 08:08 PM
Moron
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
 
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

ratings would bottleroket if daren young was on raw. tru story.
choosedoodle22 is offline  
post #2545 of 9175 (permalink) Old 04-18-2012, 08:50 PM
AND YOU SHINE MY SHOES IF I WANT YOU TO
 
Rock316AE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9,547
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabregas View Post
I'm pretty sure if it wasn't for Lesnar returning, the average RAW ratings would be below 3.0 right now.
No doubt about it, Lesnar is the only reason to watch WWE now and the only reason to watch pro wrestling in general along with Roode and Bully Ray. Without Brock the shows were doing way below 3.0. It was amazing how he gained 400k in a filler segment last week. Vince should thank god that he got Brock to save him the business and the terrible product. The promo Lesnar did with the video package was a masterpiece, awesome money promo and the best WWE did in many years.
Rock316AE is offline  
post #2546 of 9175 (permalink) Old 04-18-2012, 09:59 PM
The Face Of The Company
 
dxbender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,733
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Why do people seriously care so much about draw numbers?

Do sports teams care about who they should sign(or start) based on who can sell more tickets or merchandise? Do TV shows suddenly take away one of their main characters cause the fans aren't willing to pay for the season 1 dvd...

WWE is no different. Who cares if 1 star draws a 3.1 rating and one star draws a 3.2 rating. Why would you care about ratings when theres NO COMPETITION.

dxbender is offline  
post #2547 of 9175 (permalink) Old 04-19-2012, 02:23 AM
People are Sheep
 
Santa Snoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Snoth's Cave
Posts: 1,591
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

where are the quarters?



ChampviaDQ
Santa Snoth is offline  
post #2548 of 9175 (permalink) Old 04-19-2012, 07:04 AM
Searching for a new identity
 
zkorejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,862
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock316AE View Post
No doubt about it, Lesnar is the only reason to watch WWE now and the only reason to watch pro wrestling in general along with Roode and Bully Ray. Without Brock the shows were doing way below 3.0. It was amazing how he gained 400k in a filler segment last week. Vince should thank god that he got Brock to save him the business and the terrible product. The promo Lesnar did with the video package was a masterpiece, awesome money promo and the best WWE did in many years.
I liked it, but it was clearly a UFC video style package rip-off. I am pretty sure WWE will go on with UFC fighter gimmick for Brock Lesnar.

I hope atleast he wrestles in trunks and not shorts though.

THE REBEL

http://www.wrestlingforum.com/signaturepics/sigpic196587_40.gif
zkorejo is offline  
post #2549 of 9175 (permalink) Old 04-19-2012, 07:17 AM
Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,681
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Daniel Bryan stuff and how over he was on TV, his match with Kofi Kingston lost 603,000 viewers
He's the new Austin!!!!!1111 He's the next mega star!!!! He's going to create the next boom!!!!!

Yep.
Quote:
In the segment-by-segment, the show started unusually low (2.90) for the Punk vs. Henry title match. The match and Chris Jericho post show interview gained 308,000 viewers. Santino Marella vs. David Otunga and the Brock Lesnar interview gained 117,000 viewers. Kane vs. Zack Ryder lost 306,000 viewers. The John Cena in/ring with John Laurinaitis gained 400,000 viewers to a 3.26 quarter. This is what’s so crazy, with all the Daniel Bryan stuff and how over he was on TV, his match with Kofi Kingston lost 603,000 viewers to a 2.84 quarter. Brodus Clay vs. Dolph Ziggler gained 298,000 viewers. Great Khali & Big Show vs. Primo & Epico gained 205,000 viewers. And the John Cena vs. Lord Tensai main event gained 319,000 viewers, which is a poor overrun gain, but nobody cared about Tensai, to a 3.42.
The-Rock-Says is offline  
post #2550 of 9175 (permalink) Old 04-19-2012, 07:23 AM
Searching for a new identity
 
JasonLives's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Boden, Sweden
Posts: 5,631
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Brodus Clay vs. Dolph Ziggler gained 298,000 viewers

Da fuck? The match wasent even 30 seconds?

Great Khali & Big Show vs. Primo & Epico gained 205,000 viewers

This match wasent even 2 minutes.


Seems like the actual wrestling was the no draw of the show.
JasonLives is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome