View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
|
|
Wrestlers Draw
|
 
|
251 |
39.53% |
|
WWE Brand draws
|
 
|
384 |
60.47% |
| Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|
04-18-2012, 06:20 PM
|
#2541 (permalink)
|
|
Moron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 14
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
ratings stinky cause kids go beddy bie at 9 or later. wwe go tv14 again get better ratinz. dum dums for not doin it soner.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
04-18-2012, 06:21 PM
|
#2542 (permalink)
|
|
Little Poppa Pump
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,344
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by choosedoodle22
ratings stinky cause kids go beddy bie at 9 or later. wwe go tv14 again get better ratinz. dum dums for not doin it soner.
|


__________________
Quote:
Professional wrestling is a television show.
Unnecessary flips and choreographed spots does not equal good wrestling.
TNA's current product is like someone trying to sell a type-writer in 2013.
Ryback: "Wrestling's fans in general are negative, alot of them."
|
|
|
|
04-18-2012, 06:22 PM
|
#2543 (permalink)
|
|
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,894
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
 at the guy who said Lesnar is a waste of time because he can't draw.
|
|
|
04-18-2012, 06:25 PM
|
#2544 (permalink)
|
|
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto.
Posts: 4,921
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fargerov
 at the guy who said Lesnar is a waste of time because he can't draw.
|
Right, why is that funny? It isn't, in fact it's pretty sad. He's a UFC draw, not a WWE draw. But that's judging by TV numbers. Can't say much until we know the ER number.
__________________

best.
|
|
|
04-18-2012, 06:26 PM
|
#2545 (permalink)
|
|
Moron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 14
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by itssoeasy23
|
wat so funny? do u think i a buffooon? its true
|
|
|
04-18-2012, 06:29 PM
|
#2546 (permalink)
|
|
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,894
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrestlinfan35
Right, why is that funny? It isn't, in fact it's pretty sad. He's a UFC draw, not a WWE draw. But that's judging by TV numbers. Can't say much until we know the ER number.
|
He's not waste of time because he is a good wrestler and is entertaining. He may be a waste of money for WWE, but a waste of time, no.
|
|
|
04-18-2012, 06:37 PM
|
#2547 (permalink)
|
|
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto.
Posts: 4,921
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fargerov
He's not waste of time because he is a good wrestler and is entertaining. He may be a waste of money for WWE, but a waste of time, no.
|
Good wrestler, yes. Entertaining, eh depends on who you ask. I don't think he's even a bit entertaining. Even so, he's a special attraction. If that was not the case and he became a full time guy, then I wouldn't consider it waste of time. Still a waste of money, though. Instead of focusing on making new stars, they rely on old ones to fight Cena. But so far, Lesnar's a special attraction that clearly isn't working too well. He's gained almost no publicity for returning to WWE, and his segments are trash in terms of ratings. The Rock was a successful special attraction, Lesnar not so much.
__________________

best.
|
|
|
04-18-2012, 07:08 PM
|
#2548 (permalink)
|
|
Moron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 14
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
ratings would bottleroket if daren young was on raw. tru story.
|
|
|
04-18-2012, 07:50 PM
|
#2549 (permalink)
|
|
GET MY BAGS
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9,311
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabregas
I'm pretty sure if it wasn't for Lesnar returning, the average RAW ratings would be below 3.0 right now.
|
No doubt about it, Lesnar is the only reason to watch WWE now and the only reason to watch pro wrestling in general along with Roode and Bully Ray. Without Brock the shows were doing way below 3.0. It was amazing how he gained 400k in a filler segment last week. Vince should thank god that he got Brock to save him the business and the terrible product. The promo Lesnar did with the video package was a masterpiece, awesome money promo and the best WWE did in many years.
|
|
|
04-18-2012, 08:59 PM
|
#2550 (permalink)
|
|
Celebrating my first World title
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 14,433
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Why do people seriously care so much about draw numbers?
Do sports teams care about who they should sign(or start) based on who can sell more tickets or merchandise? Do TV shows suddenly take away one of their main characters cause the fans aren't willing to pay for the season 1 dvd...
WWE is no different. Who cares if 1 star draws a 3.1 rating and one star draws a 3.2 rating. Why would you care about ratings when theres NO COMPETITION.
__________________

Other Faves:The Rock,Edge,Jericho,Kaitlyn,McIntyre,Usos
WWE isn't in PG ERA, It's in REBUILDING ERA
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|