**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 202 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, ROH, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums

View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?

Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

Old 03-18-2012, 06:55 AM   #2011 (permalink)
1905. 1921. 1922. 1933. 1954. 2010. 2012.
 
DesolationRow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: At AT&T Park at Third and King in San Francisco, watching the franchise with 66 representatives in the Major League Baseball Hall of Fame, 11 more than any other baseball team.
Posts: 10,150
DesolationRow 11001 - 11500DesolationRow 11001 - 11500DesolationRow 11001 - 11500DesolationRow 11001 - 11500DesolationRow 11001 - 11500DesolationRow 11001 - 11500DesolationRow 11001 - 11500DesolationRow 11001 - 11500DesolationRow 11001 - 11500DesolationRow 11001 - 11500DesolationRow 11001 - 11500
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

I understand that this topic within a topic is both "far afield" as they might say in an episode of Perry Mason as well as apparently dead, but I feel so strongly about this I just felt compelled to chime in.

I would argue that, as Vin Ghostal noted, in having the WWE Championship added to the match between The Rock and John Cena, you've only added to something that does not need it and is not about it (anymore than Hogan vs. Rock a decade ago was) and taken it away from a match that truly does need it and almost demands that it have it in the match between Chris Jericho and CM Punk. Moreover, this line of thinking extends down through the top five matches. One match is a purported dream bout between The Rock and John Cena, a match many of us never believed would happen; one is a Hell in a Cell match between Triple H and The Undertaker promising to be violent and brutal, about an "End of an Era" between two legends in their own time and, one would have to imagine, the culmination of every particle of the saga between Shawn Michaels, The Undertaker and Triple H; one match is for the WWE Championship held by the hottest new main event star in WWE since at least Edge in 2006 (Jeff Hardy was probably more purely over but the impact he made was upon reflection not especially considerable, though he ironically helped to lay the foundation for CM Punk) defending it and his boastful claim that he is "The Best in the World" against a time-tested veteran specifically returning to take him out, a match between Chris Jericho and CM Punk; one is a match born out of the Royal Rumble, as Sheamus, who was on a major roll going into the January pay-per-view, won the match and was guaranteed a shot at the champion, Daniel Bryan, who opted to shortchange his own stated dream of waiting until Wrestlemania to cash in his Money in the Bank briefcase to hold the championship itself going into Wrestlemania instead, a match between Sheamus and Daniel Bryan; and a match involving twelve men who will do battle for "GM supremacy" and whichever GM's team wins, that GM will take over both "brands."

Above you see how this works. Many on here have argued that Jericho should have won The Royal Rumble but I would disagree with this. Jericho vs. Punk does not truly need Jericho be the winner of the Royal Rumble match (the question of whether or not there should ever have been a #1 contender's battle royale three weeks later to conclude Raw is an entirely other matter); Sheamus vs. Daniel Bryan does need that, as it's effectively the only strong basis on which the match is happening at all.

Beyond the issue of the Wrestlemania card, having the championship revert back to John Cena at this point in time would be something of a colossal step backward for WWE entirely. As Mister Hands noted, it would be falling back into a "holding pattern" which would do nothing less than almost assuredly cripple any genuine star-manufacturing they are undertaking as part of the Youth Movement and the recent pushes of fellows like The Miz and CM Punk. And as A-C-P stated--and it does not take a "John Cena-hater" to comprehend this--the track record for creating stars and actively drawing interest to the product under the hegemony Cena enjoyed at the top of WWE, as something like its default WWE Champion for several years, is not particularly inspiring. Cena was finally utilized properly in that role last summer, however, so it's not outside of the realm of possibilities to believe that he could be again, but since the Summer of Punk was something of an aberration considering the special circumstances the company and Punk found themselves in with his contract expiring and him fundamentally holding Vince and co. hostage to either listen to his demands/wishes (kayfabe and real life alike) before he agree to sign to a new contract, it's doubtful WWE would go in that direction again. Cutting Punk's reign short because a segment in which he wrestled lost practically all the viewers that came aboard to see the Shawn Michaels/Undertaker/Triple H promo at the top of Hour 2 (the one Wrestlemania angle that is unquestionably drawing in the viewership/ratings department and robustly so at that, situated at a very advantageous time slot that WWE's audience has been conditioned to tune into and then out of because that is when important things happen) seems a highly questionable game plan at best. CM Punk vs. The Miz, furthermore, is an outrageously overexposed, bordering-on-utterly-pointless match-up at this juncture, and with the ever-widening gulf in the way each man is booked dictating either another easy Punk victory or some screwjob finish, the incentive to stay tuned was minimal.

Point blank, though, as Mister Hands originally pointed out, who beyond old-timers who can't or won't work every week and every weekend and the John Cena Express would be the correct person to hold the championship, considering how anemically just about everyone apart from a select handful of guys at best consistently deliver an unmistakably positive impact on ratings? Punk has had his lows and he's had his highs and he's had a lot of in-betweens but considering what he's done since "The Shoot," in other quadrants of WWE's business model, how much he's earned this run and how few other realistic options remain for WWE at this time, I see no reason whatsoever to alter their current course and simply give up on him remaining WWE Champion for an extended period of time in the very practical and necessary effort to create a new top dog main event star because he happened to have a very poorly-rated and -viewed segment this past week (which, once we get past it being the lowest-rated segment of the night, wasn't that much worse than most segments on Raw this week and looks far worse than it actually is because of its adjacent placement to the white-hot segment with the white-hot angle in the advantageous quarter hour segment that the maximum number of people looked at this past week). It's been thinking like that, along with the subsequent refresh icon-hitting reflex of having the championship circle its way back to the status quo "safest choice" that has been instrumental in depriving WWE of the ability to fervently create new stars.
__________________
http://thumbs4.ebaystatic.com/d/l225/m/m97GRSimF9GA1v_ZPvgw3kg.jpg

Last edited by DesolationRow : 03-18-2012 at 07:02 AM.
DesolationRow is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 03-18-2012, 07:10 AM   #2012 (permalink)
Vince gives me a comedy gimmick
 
#1Peep4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,047
#1Peep4ever 1001 - 1500#1Peep4ever 1001 - 1500#1Peep4ever 1001 - 1500#1Peep4ever 1001 - 1500#1Peep4ever 1001 - 1500#1Peep4ever 1001 - 1500#1Peep4ever 1001 - 1500#1Peep4ever 1001 - 1500
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesolationRow View Post
I understand that this topic within a topic is both "far afield" as they might say in an episode of Perry Mason as well as apparently dead, but I feel so strongly about this I just felt compelled to chime in.

I would argue that, as Vin Ghostal noted, in having the WWE Championship added to the match between The Rock and John Cena, you've only added to something that does not need it and is not about it (anymore than Hogan vs. Rock a decade ago was) and taken it away from a match that truly does need it and almost demands that it have it in the match between Chris Jericho and CM Punk. Moreover, this line of thinking extends down through the top five matches. One match is a purported dream bout between The Rock and John Cena, a match many of us never believed would happen; one is a Hell in a Cell match between Triple H and The Undertaker promising to be violent and brutal, about an "End of an Era" between two legends in their own time and, one would have to imagine, the culmination of every particle of the saga between Shawn Michaels, The Undertaker and Triple H; one match is for the WWE Championship held by the hottest new main event star in WWE since at least Edge in 2006 (Jeff Hardy was probably more purely over but the impact he made was upon reflection not especially considerable, though he ironically helped to lay the foundation for CM Punk) defending it and his boastful claim that he is "The Best in the World" against a time-tested veteran specifically returning to take him out, a match between Chris Jericho and CM Punk; one is a match born out of the Royal Rumble, as Sheamus, who was on a major roll going into the January pay-per-view, won the match and was guaranteed a shot at the champion, Daniel Bryan, who opted to shortchange his own stated dream of waiting until Wrestlemania to cash in his Money in the Bank briefcase to hold the championship itself going into Wrestlemania instead, a match between Sheamus and Daniel Bryan; and a match involving twelve men who will do battle for "GM supremacy" and whichever GM's team wins, that GM will take over both "brands."

Above you see how this works. Many on here have argued that Jericho should have won The Royal Rumble but I would disagree with this. Jericho vs. Punk does not truly need Jericho be the winner of the Royal Rumble match (the question of whether or not there should ever have been a #1 contender's battle royale three weeks later to conclude Raw is an entirely other matter); Sheamus vs. Daniel Bryan does need that, as it's effectively the only strong basis on which the match is happening at all.

Beyond the issue of the Wrestlemania card, having the championship revert back to John Cena at this point in time would be something of a colossal step backward for WWE entirely. As Mister Hands noted, it would be falling back into a "holding pattern" which would do nothing less than almost assuredly cripple any genuine star-manufacturing they are undertaking as part of the Youth Movement and the recent pushes of fellows like The Miz and CM Punk. And as A-C-P stated--and it does not take a "John Cena-hater" to comprehend this--the track record for creating stars and actively drawing interest to the product under the hegemony Cena enjoyed at the top of WWE, as something like its default WWE Champion for several years, is not particularly inspiring. Cena was finally utilized properly in that role last summer, however, so it's not outside of the realm of possibilities to believe that he could be again, but since the Summer of Punk was something of an aberration considering the special circumstances the company and Punk found themselves in with his contract expiring and him fundamentally holding Vince and co. hostage to either listen to his demands/wishes (kayfabe and real life alike) before he agree to sign to a new contract, it's doubtful WWE would go in that direction again. Cutting Punk's reign short because a segment in which he wrestled lost practically all the viewers that came aboard to see the Shawn Michaels/Undertaker/Triple H promo at the top of Hour 2 (the one Wrestlemania angle that is unquestionably drawing in the viewership/ratings department and robustly so at that, situated at a very advantageous time slot that WWE's audience has been conditioned to tune into and then out of because that is when important things happen) seems a highly questionable game plan at best. CM Punk vs. The Miz, furthermore, is an outrageously overexposed, bordering-on-utterly-pointless match-up at this juncture, and with the ever-widening gulf in the way each man is booked dictating either another easy Punk victory or some screwjob finish, the incentive to stay tuned was minimal.

Point blank, though, as Mister Hands originally pointed out, who beyond old-timers who can't or won't work every week and every weekend and the John Cena Express would be the correct person to hold the championship, considering how anemically just about everyone apart from a select handful of guys at best consistently deliver an unmistakably positive impact on ratings? Punk has had his lows and he's had his highs and he's had a lot of in-betweens but considering what he's done since "The Shoot," in other quadrants of WWE's business model, how much he's earned this run and how few other realistic options remain for WWE at this time, I see no reason whatsoever to alter their current course and simply give up on him remaining WWE Champion for an extended period of time in the very practical and necessary effort to create a new top dog main event star because he happened to have a very poorly-rated and -viewed segment this past week (which, once we get past it being the lowest-rated segment of the night, wasn't that much worse than most segments on Raw this week and looks far worse than it actually is because of its adjacent placement to the white-hot segment with the white-hot angle in the advantageous quarter hour segment that the maximum number of people looked at this past week). It's been thinking like that, along with the subsequent refresh icon-hitting reflex of having the championship circle its way back to the status quo "safest choice" that has been instrumental in depriving WWE of the ability to fervently create new stars.
#1Peep4ever is offline  
Old 03-18-2012, 10:59 AM   #2013 (permalink)
ROH here I come!
 
corfend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,552
corfend 251 - 500corfend 251 - 500corfend 251 - 500corfend 251 - 500
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

LOL, Swagger's a bigger draw than Punk.

I kid, I kid.
corfend is offline  
Old 03-18-2012, 11:18 PM   #2014 (permalink)
What?
 
Evolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,340
Evolution 24501 - 25000Evolution 24501 - 25000Evolution 24501 - 25000Evolution 24501 - 25000Evolution 24501 - 25000Evolution 24501 - 25000Evolution 24501 - 25000Evolution 24501 - 25000Evolution 24501 - 25000Evolution 24501 - 25000Evolution 24501 - 25000
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Can someone PM me each week when the ratings get posted so I can update the OP?

Thanks in advance.
__________________
Evolution is offline  
Old 03-20-2012, 09:06 AM   #2015 (permalink)
Moron
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 55
Walshy 0 - 49
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Well, this week Punk opened the show so ratings are bound to have gone down from the ad break, amirite?

Last edited by Walshy : 03-20-2012 at 09:11 AM.
Walshy is offline  
Old 03-20-2012, 04:26 PM   #2016 (permalink)
Jeff Harvey
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 228
User *** 0 - 49
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Hour 1 - 4.490m
Hour 2 - 4.274m


WWE Raw topped Monday cable, but the 1.7 & 1.6 adults 18-49 ratings were down from last week's 2.0 and 1.8. In its season finale, Pretty Little Liars was up a hefty six tenths from last week's penultimate episode to a 1.6 adults 18-49 rating.

Punk/Jericho > The Rock,cena,HHH,Taker,HBK.
__________________

Last edited by User *** : 03-20-2012 at 04:29 PM.
User *** is offline  
Old 03-20-2012, 04:42 PM   #2017 (permalink)
Little Poppa Pump
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,228
D.M.N. 1001 - 1500D.M.N. 1001 - 1500D.M.N. 1001 - 1500D.M.N. 1001 - 1500D.M.N. 1001 - 1500D.M.N. 1001 - 1500D.M.N. 1001 - 1500D.M.N. 1001 - 1500D.M.N. 1001 - 1500D.M.N. 1001 - 1500
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

For the penultimate show before WrestleMania, that's very poor.
D.M.N. is offline  
Old 03-20-2012, 04:45 PM   #2018 (permalink)
Challenging SCOTT STEINER's authority
 
A-C-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 4,907
A-C-P 1501 - 2000A-C-P 1501 - 2000A-C-P 1501 - 2000A-C-P 1501 - 2000A-C-P 1501 - 2000A-C-P 1501 - 2000A-C-P 1501 - 2000A-C-P 1501 - 2000A-C-P 1501 - 2000A-C-P 1501 - 2000A-C-P 1501 - 2000
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

YES! its time for the weekly overreaction to the viewership numbers....

__________________
A-C-P is offline  
Old 03-20-2012, 04:53 PM   #2019 (permalink)
Gamblin' Lives, One Day At A Time
 
Gamblor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NYS
Posts: 11,029
Gamblor 6501 - 7000Gamblor 6501 - 7000Gamblor 6501 - 7000Gamblor 6501 - 7000Gamblor 6501 - 7000Gamblor 6501 - 7000Gamblor 6501 - 7000Gamblor 6501 - 7000Gamblor 6501 - 7000Gamblor 6501 - 7000Gamblor 6501 - 7000
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Ouch, not good at all. Especially since they hyped the fuck outta Rock and Taker/HHH/HBK segment (and the latter they started advertising last week). I wonder how the big slots will do. I can see Punk/Jericho starting off the show strong, maybe Rock's segment, even though it's in Q4 (or was it Q3?), could still have an increase as they at the very least advertised it before going to commercial. Cena/Henry with Rock at the end should do well on paper, but we'll see what happens. And of course Taker/HBK/HHH, which has been gaining close to a million viewers each time two of them have interacted in the 10pm timeslot (and even once getting over a million) should do really well.

We won't know how those turned out until quarters come out, but all in all a very bad number. Two weeks away from Mania and they aren't anywhere near the 5 million mark. It really does make you wonder how much WWE is going to struggle to pull in 4 million viewers for the rest of the year after Mania. I think during even the worst periods, we could see them potentially going under 3 million viewers for at least one of the hours. Hell, if everything lines up perfectly, SD may actually beat Raw in the ratings one of these months.
__________________
Grabbing mothers around the world with neon claws since 1993.

Last edited by Gamblor : 04-11-2012 at 08:49 PM.
Gamblor is online now  
Old 03-20-2012, 04:56 PM   #2020 (permalink)
Moron
 
Brave Nash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 833
Brave Nash is not that liked
Default Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Take that haters I told you don't put Punk matches during a commercial break, because it's long and its not the only show that airs in that time.
Brave Nash is offline  
Closed Thread



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


VerticalSports
Baseball Forum Golf Forum Boxing Forum Snowmobile Forum
Basketball Forum Soccer Forum MMA Forum PWC Forum
Football Forum Cricket Forum Wrestling Forum ATV Forum
Hockey Forum Volleyball Forum Paintball Forum Snowboarding Forum
Tennis Forum Rugby Forums Lacrosse Forum Skiing Forums
Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Powered by vBulletin Copyright © 2000-2009 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios