**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here) - Page 195 - Wrestling Forum : WWE, TNA, Debate League, Wrestling Videos, Women of Wrestling Forums
View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
Wrestlers Draw 251 39.53%
WWE Brand draws 384 60.47%
Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1941 of 9175 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 10:48 AM
Yelled at by SCOTT STEINER
 
charmed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,992
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
             
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

It should have been much worse Raw was horrible this week.

I Am the Master
charmed1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #1942 of 9175 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 12:03 PM
It Really Wasn't!
 
Hey Santa It Wasn't My Fault!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 16,013
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by A-C-P View Post
How dare you try to bring logical thinking to this ratings thread. In any case agree completely here. Almost 5 million people watched, good news for the WWE, great to see a bump up from the usual 4-4.5 million people that watch the show live on TV.
I know what you mean. A lot of people were obviously watching TV on Monday night. That's why the rating stayed the same but second hour was the most watched second hour since July. It's pretty silly how much power people put into the the number that the show gets and don't really seem to care about how many people actually watched the show.
Hey Santa It Wasn't My Fault! is offline  
post #1943 of 9175 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 05:19 PM
$9.99
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20,024
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TaylorFitz View Post
I know what you mean. A lot of people were obviously watching TV on Monday night. That's why the rating stayed the same but second hour was the most watched second hour since July. It's pretty silly how much power people put into the the number that the show gets and don't really seem to care about how many people actually watched the show.
Or they're just making an observation on the overall and not doing anything you think they are. Of course I'm speaking for myself here. Everybody else...you could be right.

BEST FOR CHRISTMAS is offline  
post #1944 of 9175 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 05:22 PM
WWE
Humbled
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Mississauga
Posts: 13,410
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Jinder Mahal = Ratings
WWE is offline  
post #1945 of 9175 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 05:27 PM
Is a Living, Breathing PPV
 
A-C-P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Point Place, WI
Posts: 11,579
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cycloneon View Post
Jinder Mahal = Ratings
Funkasaurus SQUAHSING Jinder Mahal = Ratings

A-C-P is offline  
post #1946 of 9175 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 05:37 PM
It Really Wasn't!
 
Hey Santa It Wasn't My Fault!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Upstate New York
Posts: 16,013
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starbuck View Post
Or they're just making an observation on the overall and not doing anything you think they are. Of course I'm speaking for myself here. Everybody else...you could be right.
It was just this weird trend that I noticed a page or so back. When the viewership came in the posts were mostly positive. Then the 3.3 rating came in and they got very negative. That's the part that I just didn't understand really.
Hey Santa It Wasn't My Fault! is offline  
post #1947 of 9175 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 06:28 PM
$9.99
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 20,024
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TaylorFitz View Post
It was just this weird trend that I noticed a page or so back. When the viewership came in the posts were mostly positive. Then the 3.3 rating came in and they got very negative. That's the part that I just didn't understand really.
For me the viewership has always been the more important figure. During WM season I, along with WWE themselves no doubt, expect Raw to be getting well over that 5 million mark. For them to finally hit that point is a good thing, albeit it really really shouldn't have taken them so long to do it considering what's going on on the show atm, but at the same time, a 3.3 during the RTWM isn't good news at all, unless of course it somehow equates to over 5 million viewers lol.

BEST FOR CHRISTMAS is offline  
post #1948 of 9175 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 06:37 PM
Working on my abs
 
The Cynical Miracle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: u.k
Posts: 2,997
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
                     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

PWTorch

Quote:
USA Network issued a press release Wednesday claiming a 23rd consecutive quarterly victory on cable TV in First Quarter 2012. USA said about WWE Raw's performance: "Raw made USA the #1 network in all of television in its Monday 9:00-11:00 p.m. time period among M18-34, beating every network but NBC and FOX in P18-34. The sports entertainment franchise delivered 2.37 million in P25-54, 2.46 in million P18-49, 1.35 million in P18-34, 4.91 million total viewers and 3.42 million households in 1Q12." Actual first-run average viewership in Q1 is currently 4.58 million viewers, indicating USA is adding 7.2 percent from DVR viewing.
Summary = Raw's doing fine. What puzzles me is that Raw's main demographic is males 18-34 and that in recent years WWE 12-17 demogrpahic has been falling. Which asks the question, why the hell is WWE rated PG?. Yes recently WWE are doing more edgy stuff that wouldnt be found in WWE in 2010 for example The Rock and Cena calling each other bitches and chickenshits, and Jerichio inserting a dark underlying story about alcoholism which touches a raw nerve within society. But still, why have we yet to see blood, brawls and bitches? not to say that will improve everything, but still?

The Cynical Miracle is offline  
post #1949 of 9175 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 07:31 PM
Not Tough Enough
 
CP Munk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Purgatory
Posts: 2,128
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
       
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

OMG Rocky cant draw.

CP Munk is offline  
post #1950 of 9175 (permalink) Old 03-14-2012, 07:53 PM
Little Poppa Pump
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,051
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
     
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)

Quote:
Originally Posted by CP Munk View Post
OMG Rocky cant draw.
actually he did in the second hour which was the highest since july and usa network is happy about it
the fox is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Closed Thread

User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome