View Poll Results: Do Wrestlers Draw, Or Does the WWE Brand Draw?
|
|
Wrestlers Draw
|
  
|
251 |
39.53% |
|
WWE Brand draws
|
  
|
384 |
60.47% |
| Voters: 635. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|
03-06-2012, 09:18 PM
|
#1781 (permalink)
|
|
GET MY BAGS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,138
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
 at the rating. Not surprised. The overall product is a joke. |
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 09:19 PM
|
#1782 (permalink)
|
|
Little Poppa Pump
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Philly
Posts: 2,083
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KiNgoFKiNgS23
the show after WM17 averaged 4.58 million viewers(corporate.wwe.com has it as the record for tnn at that time) so therefore the go home show for WMX7 was less than that. raw last night averaged over 4.6 million people. IIRC 4.6 mill > 4.5 mill. correct me if the math is wrong tho.
|
Strange, got my info from this: http://www.twnpnews.com/information/wweraw2001.shtmland this: http://www.gerweck.net/tv-ratings/2001-ratings/ So a 5.7=just over 4 and a half million viewers?
__________________
Not removing until WWE ends the Brand Extension.
PG does NOT mean "kid-friendly". Stop using the rating as an excuse for poor WWE programming.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blazegod99
You fucking politically correct morons are quick to defend WWE for every pussy ass decision they make, but complain about the show lacking attitude and intensity... SMH.
|
Right on!
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 09:19 PM
|
#1783 (permalink)
|
|
1905. 1921. 1922. 1933. 1954. 2010. 2012.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: At AT&T Park at Third and King in San Francisco, watching the franchise with 66 representatives in the Major League Baseball Hall of Fame, 11 more than any other baseball team.
Posts: 10,049
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
I liked McIntyre's slacks and dress shirt phase back when we were supposed to take him seriously. It sucks how such a talented worker has become such a footnote.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 09:21 PM
|
#1784 (permalink)
|
|
GET MY BAGS
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9,311
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KiNgoFKiNgS23
the show after WM17 averaged 4.58 million viewers(corporate.wwe.com has it as the record for tnn at that time) so therefore the go home show for WMX7 was less than that. raw last night averaged over 4.6 million people. IIRC 4.6 mill > 4.5 mill. correct me if the math is wrong tho.
|
It's not, it's households, not actual viewers. |
|
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 09:25 PM
|
#1785 (permalink)
|
|
I ATE THE BONES
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 19,171
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DesolationRow
I liked McIntyre's slacks and dress shirt phase back when we were supposed to take him seriously. It sucks how such a talented worker has become such a footnote.
|
He was such a good worker. Took down the body parts, used everything to his advantage and I didn't think he was bad on the mic. Nothing mindblowing but watchable. I'm worried he'll ever make it back up at this point.
__________________
|
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 09:28 PM
|
#1786 (permalink)
|
|
GET MY BAGS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 9,138
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brye
He was such a good worker. Took down the body parts, used everything to his advantage and I didn't think he was bad on the mic. Nothing mindblowing but watchable. I'm worried he'll ever make it back up at this point.
|
The entire WWE product right now is barely watchable wich is why the ratings sucks. |
|
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 09:31 PM
|
#1787 (permalink)
|
|
I ATE THE BONES
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 19,171
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony316
The entire WWE product right now is barely watchable wich is why the ratings sucks.
|
Completely disagree but to each his own.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 09:31 PM
|
#1788 (permalink)
|
|
Cutting a shoot promo to get over
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,062
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
|
It's not, it's households, not actual viewers.
|
so what's the difference between how ratings are gathered between now and then?
__________________
Quote:
|
Tom Brady is the best by far. It’s not even close. Drew Brees has got to be right there. Tony Romo’s a good player. I’ll take Philip Rivers there. And Peyton, he’s right there. No order except for Tom being the best. He does things that other guys can’t do. His pocket presence is better than those guys by far. He throws a better ball than just about all those guys. He’s a winner – better than all those guys."
|
- Aaron Rodgers
Last edited by KiNgoFKiNgS23 : 03-06-2012 at 09:35 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 09:40 PM
|
#1789 (permalink)
|
|
GET MY BAGS
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 9,311
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KiNgoFKiNgS23
so what's the difference between how ratings are gathered between now and then?
|
The overall number of households at that time and the availability of the network, for example, USA and TNN/Spike has different standards, that's why rating went down with the move in 2000 and went up with the move in 2005. |
|
|
|
|
03-06-2012, 09:41 PM
|
#1790 (permalink)
|
|
Drafted to Monday Night RAW
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,691
|
Re: **The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
They got the talent, they just need better material and direction IMO.
__________________
The New Brothers of Destruction
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
**The Official Raw Ratings Thread** (Discuss Ratings In Here)
