[The Cynical Miracle]

Wow Punk and Miz did horrible. But the short term memory loss in this thread is staggering. Punk for the last few weeks has been drawing good to great numbers. For example last week's mainevent which had like a 5 min overrun scored a 3.4 rating which involved Punk. This weeks with the biggest star in the company whcih was like a 15 min overun scored a 3.14

The week before that the opening with CM Punk scored a staggering 3.9 and the match with Daniel Bryan in the same night scored a 3.54.

The Match with John Larinitus the week before gained the same amount of viewers as Undertakers return with Triple H scored (761'000)

And I love how all of these good to great numbers Punk has been pulling out for the last few weeks are all immediately discounted because of this weeks bad number. Fuckin Cena scored a 2.8 in the mainevent overrun a couple of weeks ago and i dont see anyone saying "LOL CENA DOSNT DRW!!"

[taset50]

Originally Posted by jblvdx

For example last week's mainevent which had like a 5 min overrun scored a 3.4 rating which involved Punk. This weeks with the biggest star in the company whcih was like a 15 min overun scored a 3.14

The week before that the opening with CM Punk scored a staggering 3.9 and the match with Daniel Bryan in the same night scored a 3.54.

The Match with John Larinitus the week before gained the same amount of viewers as Undertakers return with Triple H scored (761'000)

The segment with CM Punk and Chris Jericho gained just 94,000 viewers – another bad showing for the 10pm timeslot.

The Six Pack Challenge with Jericho vs. Punk vs. The Miz vs. R-Truth vs. Dolph Ziggler vs. Kofi Kingston gained 443,000 viewers.

CM Punk vs. Daniel Bryan gained 219,000 viewers which is actually a weak gain for that time slot.

Opener 3.9 = previous night's Royal Rumble + the Winner Sheamus in the opening segment.

The 700k gain is obviously Laurinaitis + overrun.



Punk wasnt pulling shit.

[The Cynical Miracle]

Originally Posted by taset50

Opener 3.9 = previous night's Royal Rumble + the Winner Sheamus in the opening segment.

The 700k gain is obviously Laurinaitis + overrun.



Punk wasnt pulling shit.

Thats your argument? really? come on now. I could get any Austin or Rock segments, twist it around and be economical with the truth to make it seem they didnt "pull shit" aswell. But your'e a twelver, most likely a rejoiner, and most certainly a troll with that illogical reply.

Oh and people please stop looking and the gain and losses and look at how many people actuelly watched it. Daniel Bryan v Punk was a weak gain for that timeslot, even though more people watched that match then everything except the HHH and HBK segment this week, and it was even close to having the same viewership figure as that.

[A-C-P]

yes the awfulness that is the Ratings thread is BACK!!!!! its a must read thread, like a car wreck you just can't look away.

[Rock316AE]

Other than the MITB buyrate he didnt draw shit last year. He appeared to be a draw because of the guys he was working with, Cena, Vince and HHH. Once they were taken out of storyline, Punk bombed bad.

Besides whatever success he has had is because of the shoot. Once the shock factor wore off, people didnt give a fuck.

Originally Posted by taset50

Opener 3.9 = previous night's Royal Rumble + the Winner Sheamus in the opening segment.

The 700k gain is obviously Laurinaitis + overrun.



Punk wasnt pulling shit.

Obviously this, lol @ fanboy posting his BS twice because nobody cares about this.


And a general question, who you think is going to finally draw a 4.0 on RAW? I was wrong two times on HHH/Ace and HBK/HHH but I think next week with Taker there, + a nice overrun, they can do a 4.0

[D17]

Originally Posted by JingieBY

Quarter 1: Show opened at a 2.9
Q2: Lost 49,000 viewers (Chris Jericho vs. Kofi Kingston)
Q3: Lost 24,000 viewers (Backstage shenanigans with John Cena and Zack Ryder; John Laurinaitis and David Otunga)
Q4: Gained 93,000 viewers (Big Show vs. Randy Orton)
Q5: Gained 822,000 (return of Michaels, Triple H, Undertaker video) to take the show to a 3.6
Q6: Lost 621,000 viewers (Dolph Ziggler vs. R-Truth)
Q7: Lost 320,000 viewers (Tamina Snuka vs. Brie Bella; Eve walking into the back of an ambulance & ensuing snog with Cena)
Q8: Lost 139,000 viewers (C.M. Punk vs. The Miz) to do a 2.8.
Over-run: Gained 505,000 (Kane zooming Ryder off a 3ft stage) viewers to close out on a 3.1.

[#1Peep4ever]

god i love this thread

[The Host]

Originally Posted by jblvdx

Thats your argument? really? come on now. I could get any Austin or Rock segments, twist it around and be economical with the truth to make it seem they didnt "pull shit" aswell. But your'e a twelver, most likely a rejoiner, and most certainly a troll with that illogical reply.

Oh and people please stop looking and the gain and losses and look at how many people actuelly watched it. Daniel Bryan v Punk was a weak gain for that timeslot, even though more people watched that match then everything except the HHH and HBK segment this week, and it was even close to having the same viewership figure as that.

You dont understand Viewership, do you?

Jan 30 RAW show's overall viewership was higher than this week's show. Unless you can prove punk is responsible for that, your post simply fails.

[The Cynical Miracle]

Originally Posted by The Host

You dont understand Viewership, do you?

Jan 30 RAW show's overall viewership was higher than this week's show. Unless you can prove punk is responsible for that, your post simply fails.

The overrun mainevent of last weeks show drew a 3.4 which Punk was involved in and got top billing for.

The overrun segment of this weeks which had longer overun benefitting it only drew a 3.14 rating

So Punk is partly responsible for the higher rating last week. And yes he is partly responsible for the low rating this week. I just cant stand the short term memory loss peopel have on this thread where a man who cosistently drew good and healthy numbers for weeks has been immediately discounted because of the bad numbers he drew in one show.

[A-C-P]

Originally Posted by jblvdx

The overrun mainevent of last weeks show drew a 3.4 which Punk was involved in and got top billing for.

The overrun segment of this weeks which had longer overun benefitting it only drew a 3.14 rating

So Punk is partly responsible for the higher rating last week. And yes he is partly responsible for the low rating this week. I just cant stand the short term memory loss peopel have on this thread where a man who cosistently drew good and healthy numbers for weeks has been immediately discounted because of the bad numbers he drew in one show.

You have to ask yourself this question? Does it really surprise you, and when you get to the answer that no it doesn't surprise you, You will be better equipped to just ignore it and appreciate the entertainment value of reading this troll vs troll/mark vs mark completely awful (in a good way) thread.