i hope this isnt a month thing like the may 19th storyline cause kane deserves better than that. i havnt got a clue what he means by alive or dead fairplay to wwe they have me lost. kane wont be putting his mask back on sadly, the third brother sounds good on paper but would it play out well?. thats my 2 cents
My guess is that he is refering to his brother The Undertaker because I see it hard to belive that he wants to know if Mr McMahon is alive or not. This could very well be the ticket in for undertaker to come back, a good old fued with his brother. It's been sen before so why not! Whatever it is it's sure good to see that Kane is back to is real self, the monster we all love!
I personally love seeing psycho Kane come back. He was getting stale and jobbing alot, and now you would have to say he's a bonafide monster heel.
As far as the "is he dead or alive" thing goes, I really don't it has anything to do with Taker. He's not dead, just "banned", and he's not even on the same show as Kane, so what would be the point of having him go on about Taker. I think it's either about Vinnie Mac and the sabotage or like someone said he could be introducing the another brother that was in the fire.
We don't need another Taker/Kane sequal. Although ANYTHING that brings back Taker back is ok by me. I've been boycotting Smackdown since Taker's been gone
Anyways there shouldn't be a third brother.Finding someone to carry on Taker's legacy would be really difficult. Even Kane isn't really Undertaker's equal...well nobody is really. And we don't need to bring up the fire again Taker has admitted at least twice to being the pyro. The first time in late 98 with his heel turn, and in spring of 2001 when Taker, and Kane fought HHH, and Austin. Taker said, and I quote "That fire that burnt Kane's face as a child?...I lit it." Yep I know I need another hobby...I have total Taker recall(what can I say I am really dedicated). Besides we know Kane isn't scarred up so the subject is moot imo.
To me the most logical thing is Vince's state right now. Paul Bearer is history(though they did confirm he lived), Taker never "died" at ONS...he walked out remember?...It couldn't be Kane's son because unless the kid went from 0 to 21 years old in three years what sense would it make? It's most likely Vince...and Kane DOES have a motive...Vince has made a joke out of him for years...Katie Vick is motive enough.
Last edited by DarkLordUndertaker : 07-08-2008 at 07:56 PM.
Reason: spelling bluff...sorry
I think its referring to Vince. Since Kane doesnt know if Vince is dead or alive. And his motive would be that he gets so much further without Vince (for example, last week he didnt have a match, but this week he was in a World title #1 Contenders match, which just shows that he is doing better without Vince around).
Location: Hopefully I can put America in this little box one day, but for the moment, I'll have to put the United Kingdom.
Posts: 3,700
Re: Kane Heel Turn? "Alive or Dead?"
Oh boy I just finished watching Raw and I almost creamed when Kane made the turn.
It was really well done so propps to the WWE. I actually thought he might pick up the win in the fatal fourway match, and was pretty gutted when he got pinned. However the heel turn made up for that.
Seriously, I am so intrigued now about the whole 'dead or alive' thing. It could be about anything. none of us know. I just can't wait to see what it's all about.
Again propps for the WWE.
KANES BACK!!!!!!
__________________
Quote:
When our time is up, when our lives are done. Will we say we've had our fun?
Will we make a mark? This time. Will we always say we tried?
Standing on the rooftops, everybody scream your heart out. Standing on the rooftops, everybody scream your heart out. Standing on the rooftops, everybody scream your heart out. Standing on the rooftops, everybody scream your heart out!
It's a well known fact that Glen Jacobs (Kane) is a huge fan of the rapper Tupac Shakur. And, like many people he is skeptical about the details surrounding his death, leading him to belive in the possibility that Tupac is alive.
But seriously, this could be a half decent storyline. I believe that it will involve Vince. And due to the "marshall law" that has been declared, Undertaker could freely make a return. However I doubt he will have anything to do with the Kane storyline.
Please God, let them book this right
__________________
Best Quote Ever. (On scrapping the Vince Death Angle)
Quote:
Originally Posted by safc_fan
They should have bandaged Vince up and make him look injured so they could sell the idea that he had been found and was ok.
It's a well known fact that Glen Jacobs (Kane) is a huge fan of the rapper Tupac Shakur. And, like many people he is skeptical about the details surrounding his death, leading him to belive in the possibility that Tupac is alive.
But seriously, this could be a half decent storyline. I believe that it will involve Vince. And due to the "marshall law" that has been declared, Undertaker could freely make a return. However I doubt he will have anything to do with the Kane storyline.
Please God, let them book this right
I think everyone is hoping for that. To see him used better on Raw I now am glad he was moved over.
I've already stated my theory but what if Kane is actually talking about himself?
Think about, Kane isn't exactly the monster hwas back in 1998, and he's been on a losing streak with an ECW Title loss and getting beat by Batista on Raw. Is it Kane asking whether or not the monster within him is dead?
Kane Heel Turn? "Alive or Dead?"
Re: Kane Heel Turn? "Alive or Dead?"
