Re: The Intercontinental Championship
The belt hasn't meant squat in close to a decade IMO. When I was a teen, the belt meant everything, because it was the only singles belt you saw on WWF TV on a regular basis. Until the belt means enough to the WWE to even be defended at Mania, which hasn't happened in like 6 years, it won't mean anything. I think the WWE needs less belts period. As long as there are a total of 5 men's singles titles, all lose value. I would unify the 3 world titles (and 2 tag) and keep the IC and US brand specific. I think having less titles, increases the value of all.
__________________
It's better to be hated for who you are,
than be loved for who you're not.
|