Wrestling Forum banner

No Raw MITB Because Of Roman-Brock WM34 Match?

4K views 49 replies 40 participants last post by  The Boy Wonder 
#1 ·
I think that the MITB PPV is a SD exclusive PPV because Vince dont want any cash in(or a failed cash in) on Brock or Roman.

Vince wants a long Brock title reign from WM33 until WM34 and then after WM34 another long Roman Reigns title reign(Vince is planning this Roman title reign since WM30 when he decided to end the Undertaker streak so Roman could get that streak/Brock rub) so Vince didn't want any cash in on either Brock or Roman.

Vince don't want any title changes on Raw. He is planning this Brock-Roman match for 3-4 years and he don't want any distractions.

Roman going over Brock at WM is Vince's main goal.
I am kind of excited about it because i can't remember a WWE match that they build for 4 years.

When i think about it now, The Rumble is in philadelphia next year. The same city Roman won the rumble in 2015. Maybe Vince wants to go back 2015 RTWM scenario to his original plan and start it all over again only this time Roman does wins it at Wrestlemania from Brock and get his ultimate coronation.
So, Roman wins the Rumble next year? He will main event Wrestlemania 34 ... That's for sure.

This time there will be NO MITB cash in that will ruin Roman's moment like in WM31 or Survivor Series 2015.

That is my opinion, what do you think? personally I don't see anyone holding the Universal title the next 15 months expect for Brock & Roman.
 
See less See more
#6 ·
This whole Reigns-Brock WM34 build it's the worst thing I've ever seen in WWE. With Strowman out, the main event picture on RAW is so boring, I don't even watch the highlights. As much as a jobber Jinder is, he at least is defending his title and keeps the stories fresh. Reigns-Brock doesn't need the title and it shouldn't main event WM34.
 
#5 ·
It's actually very possible. This is a desperate situation where the RAW guys are faced with basically iron ceilings that they can't break whatsoever unless a miracle occurs. The upside of this is that whoever beats Reigns after WM34 would be elevated to a whole new level if he somehow gets booked right, but that's a huge "if" of course.

At this point you really can't expect WWE to have consistently "good" booking and "great" booking for even once. Something outside of their control will have to happen for anything that's really interesting to occur. A year is not a short time though, so we'll see.
 
#3 ·
man roman beating lesnar at 34 is like slowly edging towards a cliff, you know that drop is coming but you cant do anything about it.

I mean the predictably of it will be off the charts if they cant throw in some kind of curve ball especially if it comes out that brock will indeed be done with wwe after wrestlemania.
 
#10 ·
Worst. Shit. Ever.

1) Brock didn't deserve the rub of The Streak.

2) Roman is boring as fuck. He makes me want to quit watching but I have invested nearly 30 years and it is hard to quit watching something I am so familiar with.

3) 2014 was fucking awful with the Daniel Bryan giving up the Title simply so Brock can take it hostage.

The first Roman/Brock match was shit. Everyone beats off to it simply because of Rollins cashing in. Many act like WWE switched plans on Roman not winning was a audible by Vince. I thought the cash-in was super predictable. While I enjoyed it I thought the Brock/Reigns portion of the main event was "suplex city" boring like a majority of Brock and Reigns matches.
 
#35 ·
They should have had Rollins go to Lesnar's house and just beat him incessantly with the briefcase for him to cash it in back in 2014.

Or even better, the person cashing in should just go "ok I want a shot, if they don't show up they forfeit"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frost99
#41 ·
Raw not having a MITB match is better than what was probably Vinces other idea.

Heel winning the MITB
Roman beating Brock at Mania
Random heel cashing in straight after.
Superman punch. Spear.

Roman Retains.

the meltdown on here would be glorious.[/QUOTE]

Yes I love people bitching about Reigns as almost as much as people bitch about Alexa. :wink2:
 
#8 ·
#16 ·
Even if this is their plan (which seems evident), they should have a MITB winner just to add subplots and additional storylines. Not to mention just for the match to add to what is going to be an incredibly weak MITB card.

This could be the perfect opportunity for them to have a failed cash in, so as to not have it be such a lock that the MITB winner always wins the title. A guy like Miz would be perfect for this, as it keeps him relevant, and him failing on the cash in doesn't really affect him. It would actually even build up Lesnar more. Have him go through a war against a Strowman or someone and still have him thwart the cash in attempt.
 
#21 ·
I thought Brock/Roman was a far more engaging main event even before the cash in that than the watching paint dry HHH/Reigns
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top