Wrestling Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

Is Bayley/Sasha the women's equivalent to Shawn/Undertaker?

3K views 45 replies 39 participants last post by  CJ 
#1 ·
#3 ·
Is this a serious question\thread?

I can't tell if you're being trolly; yet I'd say no that's absolutely absurd,they don't have the name value nor star power Shawn Michael's or Undertaker posses. You're making me dislike them even more.

They've only been in pro wrestling for less than 5 years. Most of that time was spent in NXT.

DON'T over saturate them by comparing them to GOATS.

None of them are household names even after three year's of WWE pushing them. To the max.

Sorry the 4HW are not godly talent. Their best is not even better than Natalya in Ring. OR Alicia fox. Supposed "jobbers"= yup.
 
#4 ·
I'll take this is some type of troll thread.... Bayley and Sasha dont compare in any way shape or form to Shawn and Taker, the latter have had a long history career in WWE and are very well respected by many fans for all the great matches they have had. Sasha and bayley have maybe been wrestling for 9 years or less, and Sasha has been in the main roster for less than 2 years. Get your head examined OP
 
#9 ·
I know you're trolling but both women are mediocre in ring, and both are garbage on mic.

What made you think of this comparison? All of their matches will be forgettable.
 
#24 ·
Having a hard time distinguishing which one has the dead (wo)man gimmick, and which one is supposed to be the heart breaker? Help me make sense of this, lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 307858
#25 ·
Slap in the face to both Shawn & Taker if we are all being honest. Natalya is better than both Bayley & Sasha on their best day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gsm1988 and 307858
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Top