I can't tell if you're being trolly; yet I'd say no that's absolutely absurd,they don't have the name value nor star power Shawn Michael's or Undertaker posses. You're making me dislike them even more.
They've only been in pro wrestling for less than 5 years. Most of that time was spent in NXT.
DON'T over saturate them by comparing them to GOATS.
None of them are household names even after three year's of WWE pushing them. To the max.
Sorry the 4HW are not godly talent. Their best is not even better than Natalya in Ring. OR Alicia fox. Supposed "jobbers"= yup.
I'll take this is some type of troll thread.... Bayley and Sasha dont compare in any way shape or form to Shawn and Taker, the latter have had a long history career in WWE and are very well respected by many fans for all the great matches they have had. Sasha and bayley have maybe been wrestling for 9 years or less, and Sasha has been in the main roster for less than 2 years. Get your head examined OP
That's almost insulting to those two men. There is no female equivalent. None of them are even in the same universe as Shawn or Taker. If anything, with WWE's way of doing things, they'll eventually end up as the female Cena/Orton: Forced and stale.
Having a hard time distinguishing which one has the dead (wo)man gimmick, and which one is supposed to be the heart breaker? Help me make sense of this, lol.
I like Sasha and all but come on comparing them to Shawn/Undertaker? Really? If any divas where to the level of Shawn/Undertaker it was Trish and Lita.
Shawn and Taker actually had more than one very good match following and followed by a bunch of meh ones so hell no, it isn't
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Wrestling Forum
23.4M posts
266.5K members
Since 2002
A forum community dedicated to all Wrestling enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about WWE, AEW, Ring of Honor, Impact and all forms of professional and amateur wrestling.