Re: What Exactly is the "Royal Rumble Controversy" and What is Expected to Happen on RAW?
The controversy is Axel never getting eliminated and therefore winning the Royal Rumble. It will be corrected by Triple H nullifying Reigns's win and setting up Axel vs. Lesnar in a 30 minute iron man match at WrestleMania.
The controversy is Axel never getting eliminated and therefore winning the Royal Rumble. It will be corrected by Triple H nullifying Reigns's win and setting up Axel vs. Lesnar in a 30 minute iron man match at WrestleMania.
Bringing back the WHC is bad, Daniel Bryan is not some B star on Smackdown in 2002.
Daniel Bryan is the face of the company and drew the biggest Wrestlemania of all time in Wrestlemania XXX.
You don't make the face of the company B show(Smackdown) exclusive, you have him main eventing on both the Main(Raw) and B shows.
You also have One world title, 2 world titles didn't work and it sucked, WWE finally corrected themselves with 1 world title.
1 Roster, 1 World Title.
Daniel Bryan made history on Raw, you keep him there. putting him on the b show and having 2 world titles is going backwards.
Simply remove Roman Reigns from the main event of Wrestlemania 31 because he's not ready to be the World Champion, and build up mid card titles. you don't create another world title, all you do is devalue both of them. instead you have 1 prestigious World Title while pushing all your other titles.
Then give Reigns the mid card title which will elevate him, rather than backfire.
It's always the same thing why is everyone so obsessed with Daniel Bryan and instead of wanting something new they just keep wanting the same shit again and again!!! He just came back from injury he won the title last year and had a terrible run with a ridiculous supposedly scary Kane feud so why can't we have something new such hypocrisy zigglers been around for years and was always getting heat the same thing with Orton but now you flip flop and decide they are your WW3 saviours it's so repetitive and ignorant smarks trying to hijack shows and throwing hissy fits to get what they want which is the same shit on repeat again and again
It's always the same thing why is everyone so obsessed with Daniel Bryan and instead of wanting something new they just keep wanting the same shit again and again!!! He just came back from injury he won the title last year and had a terrible run with a ridiculous supposedly scary Kane feud so why can't we have something new such hypocrisy zigglers been around for years and was always getting heat the same thing with Orton but now you flip flop and decide they are your WW3 saviours it's so repetitive and ignorant smarks trying to hijack shows and throwing hissy fits to get what they want which is the same shit on repeat again and again
WWE's done more ridiculous things, like have an entire Royal Rumble match revolve around making Roman Reigns look good at the expense of literally everyone else.
How? Big Show & Kane attack Reigns out came Rock, WWE is now asking "Would Roman Reigns have won the Royal Rumble Match without The Rock’s help?" If Rusev & Reigns were the last two after the Rock' interfering why is Daniel Bryan in this match again?
What's the controversy? Reigns won fair and square. Bryan and Ziggler lost fair and square.
How can they possibly announce there is a "controversy"?
If that is the case then they are completely admitting the planned outcome aspect of wrestling by saying the fans did not like what they decided the outcome would be.
What's the controversy? Reigns won fair and square. Bryan and Ziggler lost fair and square.
How can they possibly announce there is a "controversy"?
If that is the case then they are completely admitting the planned outcome aspect of wrestling by saying the fans did not like what they decided the outcome would be.
Easy to fix, Big Show and Kane eliminated everyone for Roman Reigns, pretended to be against him to make him look dominant, in reality they were helping Roman Reigns, because Roman Reigns is what the Corporation/The Authority is looking for as the face of WWE.
What's funny about all of this is that there is no controversy kayfabe-wise. And it's funny how Monday and Thursday Michael Cole consistently mentioned all the "controversy" that Ambrose, Bryan, and Ziggler didn't win.
What's funny about all of this is that there is no controversy kayfabe-wise. And it's funny how Monday and Thursday Michael Cole consistently mentioned all the "controversy" that Ambrose, Bryan, and Ziggler didn't win.
with Triple H's announcement that at Fast Lane it will be a fatal 4 way with Roman's Royal Rumble spot on the line it would be not fair if he would lose. He won the damn Royal Rumble and he should go to Mania against Brock. Bryan was eliminated from the Royal Rumble clean so what the fuck do you want? Vince do the right thing and don't listen to these indy marks and put Roman in the main event and make him win.
I am not a Reigns fan or hater....I am 100% unbiased on him.....That being said, I am a huge Rollins fan...Just letting you know where I stand before this comment....The WWE needs to keep the Lesnar/Reigns match at WM.....This ho-hum BS back and forth, we made a decision that we knew the fans would hate, oh i guess we better change because the fans really hate it HAS GOT TO STOP....Make a decision and stick with it for better or worse...Worst case scenario, the match will suck (it probably will) and you have to have A)Seth cash in or B) Reigns drop the strap at the next PPV......
I am so sick and tired of the WWE having no balls at all....The booking is trash, the story lines are trash, and half the matches are trash....
I think the announcement will be something along the lines of a Fast Lane match involving Reigns losing his spot at WrestleMania. They may even pull an elimination chamber match. Whatever happens, I see them stacking the deck against Reigns to try and get the crowd back behind him and finally accept that he's going to fight Lesnar at WM.
I'm still pinning my hopes on something that gets DB in the mainevent. Hopefully a match with Reigns with the title shot on the line. That would be the smarkiest justice, feeding Reigns to Bryan, jobbing him out, burying him, relegate him to the preshow. It best for business, Trips, you know it's true.
That would be the smarkiest justice, feeding Reigns to Bryan, jobbing him out, burying him, relegate him to the preshow. It best for business, Trips, you know it's true.
I personally will never accept Reigns' push until Ambrose is treated equally. I have stood that way since their debut, never liked Reigns being paired with Dean, and saw the obvious since day 1.
Others liked Reigns, but I could never get behind his character due to knowing what happens in the future. Well, here we are, and I expected all of this. If WWE wants to know each reason why everyone dislikes Roman's push, well mine is to push Dean on equal ground. You used Dean and Seth to shield (literally) Reigns. The Shield and it's name meant protecting Reigns.
There's no way that they are taking Reigns out of the title match. However they may well be adding at least one more person to it. Also perhaps a stipulation.
It doesn't matter how much Vince wants it, sometimes the pure strength of a fan backlash can alter his plans. Maybe Bryan is getting added to the mix after all. If not then Ziggler, or Rollins, or anyone they think will make people give a damn about their wrestlemania main event.
Can you imagine the buy rate if they DIDN'T change the match?
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Wrestling Forum
23.4M posts
266.5K members
Since 2002
A forum community dedicated to all Wrestling enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about WWE, AEW, Ring of Honor, Impact and all forms of professional and amateur wrestling.