Originally Posted by LeaderOfM.D.R.S.
So we're gonna act like Mankind didn't main event when he was champion or the fact that Evolution will be going against 3 young guys to put them over?
This is really getting on my nerves. People whine and bitch about the Fed never making new stars. So when Daniel Bryan finally gets put over at Mania by going over basically ALL of Evolution, all I hear is "THEY SAVED WRESTLEMANIA" and "ITS A NEW ERA".
So now, Evolution is now formally reassembling to put over the Shield in the same way. What do I hear? "OH MY GOD, REIGNS SUCKS SO MUCH ASS", "GOD THIS IS SO BORING AND PREDICTABLE", "TERRIBLE ENDING TO RAW" and "NOBODY WANTS TO SEE EVOLUTION, MAKE THEM GO AWAY". I'm sorry, but what happened to making these new stars? Either you want new, established, younger talent to take over from the older guys, or you don't. If you don't, that's fine. If you do, why are you praising the WWE when they make one guy, yet are actively fighting against them when they try to make 3 more? Shield going over Evolution will give them a big rub, why is that a bad thing? I'm going to take a WILD guess and say that its because people don't like Roman Reigns because he can't work 60 minutes each night or cut scathing promos.
This is why an era where the fans and their reactions dictate the booking is such a ridiculously stupid idea. Last week people were pissing themselves over anticipation for this idea, and a week later a bunch have already turned on it.
I, for one, am interested in this angle. Then again, I really enjoyed Evolution back in the day. I didn't care about Trips and his hated 2003 run. I wasn't a member of the IWC then-I was a casual fan and that's why I probably liked it.