This guy just can't seem to accept that TNA is like the WWE's semi-retarded half brother in some people's mind. He's been on quite the Crusade to spread the gospel of TNA since joining. Every post I see of his pertains to how much better TNA is then WWE. It's like some weird version of little penis syndrome. Do you really need to constantly compare the two companies in order to validate the product you choose to watch? Shut the fuck up. His signature has got to be the stupidest fucking thing ever typed on WF:
TNA is way better than WWE is. The product is consistently more entertaining with better wrestlers and story lines, along with legitimate characters. It is far more enjoyable and the company will take big strides in 2013. But go ahead, WWE marks, tell me WWE is better than TNA because more people watch Raw than Impact. I suppose that the Gangnam Style guy and Justin Bieber are better than the Beatles because they have more views? But hey, why not just listen to Bo Dallas?
The logic presented here is overwhelming. I mean, what solid concrete evidence to support his claims.
1) You just compared TNA to the mother fucking Beatles. Really? You're already an idiot.
2) What the fuck are you talking about? The Beatles are the highest selling artists of all-time, something like 300+ million. That's way more than those other two tools. If anything, in your stupid ass analogy, the WWE are the Beatles.
3) And if you're trying to compare YouTube views of a band from the 60s to two current artists, then just fuck off. How's the short bus feel?
Also I'm hoping you're having a great time in London with Austin Aries, outpopping WWE's entire roster is, douche. Watch your show and try to contain your insecurities.
Jeff Hardy Hater reminds me of that kid on your baseball team in Little League you stick in right field for 2 innings because it's required every kid plays. I can't explain it better than that.