Thread Tools

BULLY · 03-03-2013, 04:14 PM

If there's one thing that rustles my jimmies somewhat, its these feminists who somehow think looking like a rhinoceros somehow makes them more "real" than females who are fit/ healthy.

I don't make a habit of it, but I look through magazines and they have more and more heffers being passed off as "real woman" I think this is damaging to woman and promotes unhealthiness. Why is a woman who gorges herself with cheeseburgers deemed more healthy than one who does not? If a girl looks better than you, don't be jelly (and by jelly I mean jealous not that suger filled nonsense you eat with your ice cream every night you bohemoth)

A lot of feminists will say "Oh you're a man it doesn't matter if you're fat" .. uhh yes it does. This is a typical straw manning fallacy fatties use to defend their girth. I myself have struggled with weight. Never once did I rest on my laurels and go "oh I'm a real man" I did something about it. Went to the gym, started lifting, and took cheesecakes and cream buns out of my diet.

It wasn't that long ago that people complained that skinny/anorexic girls are being glamourised. Well guess what glamorising fat out of shape woman is just as bad if not worse. Being overweight leads to high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes and a wide range of other things. Being skinny whilst, looking shitty, generally won't take so many years off your life (except in extreme cases)

"Oh Bully it's so hard! I don't know how to lose weight!" It's not hard at all. it's ridiculously easy. Stop eating junk and start lifting.

]

Eating right and exercising isn't just about image. Oh no. It's about feeling good about yourself, having confidence, and not being bitter everytime you see a woman on tv/ on an internet forum/ in real life who isn't an overweight disgusting slob like yourself.

Dunk20 · 03-03-2013, 04:16 PM

"Real" feminists look hot as fuck.

**The Tony** · 03-03-2013, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunk20

"Real" feminists look hot as fuck.

No one wants to hear your opinion dunk20.

**greendayedgehead** · 03-03-2013, 04:17 PM

And "real" feminists don't villainise other women, and acknowledge that they come in different shapes.

why2cj · 03-03-2013, 04:19 PM

BULLY · 03-03-2013, 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by why2cj

GOAT smiley right there

**Catalanotto** · 03-03-2013, 04:29 PM

It's not that anyone is glamorising overweight women in the way to say 'it's okay to be an unhealthy weight, so go out and eat all the shit you can!!!', they are just trying to get a message across that women should love themselves, no matter what size they are. No woman WANTS to be fat, but, some can't help it. It's not all about overeating and not exercising. Some women (and men) just can't lose the fat. Our bodies are made differently. My brothers can eat 24/7 and not gain a pound. I can eat one cheeseburger and it sits on my fucking thighs forever.

I also don't think they are trying to say that a fat chick is more 'real' than a fit female. I think they are just trying to say that it isn't reality having every single female a size 0. There are women of different shapes and sizes out there and you need to accept yourself.

The people I do NOT feel sorry for are the ones who cry that they are fat as they continue to stuff their faces with chocolate and cake and sit around all day long doing nothing. Fuck those pigs.

Anyway, it's easy for a guy to say it isn't different for them but it is....a fat chick will get comments while a fat dude most likely will not. A fat woman will get judged and a fat guy wont. It's a bit of a mindset that it is 'normal' if a guy is fat but if a woman is fat, it's easy to throw out insults at her and think of her as less than a fit female.

I am not saying guys don't ever get the same treatment, but, it's a fact that women get judged way harsher when it comes to weight than a guy does.

That's just the way I see it, anyway. Everyone has a different perception of things. I hate feminists, though, they are pathetic.

blarg_ · 03-03-2013, 04:39 PM

Hey , at least the feminists the OP is referring to ain't as bad as this one.

Quote:

http://evebitfirst.wordpress.com/201...-supporter-if/

This is a handy guide for women who involve themselves with men. I’ve recently received a bunch of comments from men who say that they aren’t rape supporters because they (1) have never “raped” a woman and/or (2) are gay. If you are around a man who claims to be anti-rape, see how he stacks up.

A man is a rape-supporter if…

He has ever sexually engaged with any woman while she was underage, drunk, high, physically restrained, unconscious, or subjected to psychological, physical, economic, or emotional coercion.
He defends the current legal definition of rape and/or opposes making consent a defense.
He has accused a rape victim of having “buyer’s remorse” or wanting to get money from the man.
He has blamed a woman for “putting herself in a situation” where she “could be” attacked.
He has procured a prostitute.
He characterizes prostitution as a “legitimate” “job” “choice” or defends men who purchase prostitutes.
He has ever revealed he conceives of sex as fundamentally transactional.
He has gone to a strip club.
He is anti-abortion.
He is pro-”choice” because he believes abortion access will make women more sexually available.
He frames discussions of pornography in terms of “freedom of speech.”
He watches pornography in which women are depicted.
He watches any pornography in which sexual acts are depicted as a struggle for power or domination, regardless of whether women are present.
He characterizes the self-sexualizing behavior of some women, such as wearing make-up or high heels, as evidence of women’s desire to “get” a man.
He tells or laughs at jokes involving women being attacked, sexually “hoodwinked,” or sexually harassed.
He expresses enjoyment of movies/musicals/TV shows/plays in which women are sexually demeaned or presented as sexual objects
He mocks women who complain about sexual attacks, sexual harassment, street cat-calls, media depictions of women, or other forms of sexual objectification.
He supports sexual “liberation” and claims women would have more sex with (more) men if society did not “inhibit” them.
He states or implies that women who do not want to have sex with men are “inhibited,” “prudes,” “stuck-up,” “man-haters,” or psychologically ill.
He argues that certain male behaviors towards women are “cultural” and therefore not legitimate subjects of feminist attention.
He ever subordinates the interests of women in a given population to the interests of the men in that population, or proceeds in discussions as if the interests of the women are the same as the interests of the men.
He promotes religious or philosophical views in which a woman’s physical/psychological/emotional/sexual well-being is subordinated to a man’s.
He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness” of female anatomy when describing women.
He defends the physical abuse of women on the grounds of “consent.”
He defends the sexualization or sexual abuse of minor females on the grounds of “consent” or “willingness.”
He promotes the idea that women as a class are happier or more fulfilled if they have children, or that they “should” have children.
He argues that people (or just “men”) have sexual “needs.”
He discusses the “types” of women he finds sexually appealing and/or attempts to demean women by telling them he does not find them sexually appealing.
He sexually objectifies lesbians or lesbian sexual activity.
He defends these actions by saying that some women also engage in them.
So, let’s see how many women reading this know at least one male over the age of 18 who does not fit this list. Anybody?

Old news, but lulz.

**greendayedgehead** · 03-03-2013, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Catalanotto

I hate feminists, though, they are pathetic.

Dunk20 · 03-03-2013, 04:42 PM

Women are gorgeous. Perfect "creatures" if you ask me. They almost make me believe the shit that the bible talks about.