Quote:
Originally Posted by SPCDRI
What if the Great Khali became an enormous draw overnight and 3 million extra people watched every Great Khali segment? Would he be the GOAT Khali, you dumb motherfucker? Have some neg.
|
If he was able to stay a massive draw for a good period of time he would be a contender.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 777
I'll argue on two levels. First, if guys like Rock and Hulk are the 'best', despite their obvious flaws, where does that leave a fan like me who doesn't care for the performances of either? Recognizing shallow flock mentality and seeking more substance makes me wrong?
|
There the two biggest draws in wrestling history so your opinion of there work is worthless. What i dont understand is how the IWC obsesses over in ring talent but guys like Taker, HBK, Bret, Flair were never huge draws like Rocky. Just saying
Quote:
Originally Posted by asdf0501
So the best book in history is Harry Potter?
And the best film is Avatar?
You know, Books, music, theater and Movies are also scripted so the most popular should be the best...
If you can't distinct quality in a media for yourself under the own rules of that media, and the only thing you like is the most popular because "obejctively" is supposedly the best, you're a sad human being.
|
The real problem is most people dont understand or want to accept its a business which sole purpose is to maximize revenue. If a guy like HBK has 5 star matches but isnt a huge draw than how on gods earth does that make him better than Rocky who isnt as good in the ring but still draws far more? Imo that only further proves how much better he is than HBK. Truth is most people spend there money to see larger than life characters not ring technicians hence why all the great in ring works arent massive draws