You can't compare The Rock with Chris Jericho. Jericho returns almost every year and wrestles hundreds of matches if you count also house shows.
THATS THE FUCKING POINT. Rock, the fucking WWE champion isnt scheduled at any house shows, isnt going to wrestle in any free TV matches between now and WM, and we're supposed to buy that he's a wrestler who somehow earned his title shot? Shit, he didnt even wrestle in a #1 contender's match to get his shot at the rumble. People give Cena shit for being at the top just because he's John Cena (mind you, I'm one of those people)....but why doesnt the same logic apply to the Rock? At least Cena is on the company's FLAGSHIP program.
The Rock returned just 2 years ago, and if you count his matches at EC and WrestleMania it will be only 5 matches in 2 years since he returned, he will probably lose the title against John Cena and that's it. He will have a tiny 2 months title reign that will go down in history like Hogan's title run in 2002 or Bret Hart's US title run in WWE and that's it, a short WWE title reign for one of the greatest WWE superstars that will not harm the business in any way, The Rock will actually only bring more prestige to the title.
holding the title, wrestling only 3 matches in the year, and losing to Cena in a predictable outcome at WM 29 is "bringing prestige" back to the title? And then you wonder why I think you're the dumbest mother fucker posting on these forums?
What if the Rock hasn't returned? Would you be more happy that super Cena has won the title for the 345th time from Punk at the Rumble? Or Dolph Ziggler where you would probably mark out only to see him lose it after just 2 months?
I would rather Dolph Ziggler win the title, and be in a back-and-forth MEANINGFUL feud with someone than to know that the guy Ziggler is feuding with will only be gone in 65 days.
If the Rock appeared and wrestles in WWE so many times like Jericho you would have a point but he will have only 5 matches in only 2 years, only 3 of them are for the title and it will consists only of 1 title win, 1 defence and 1 loss.
Jericho knows that because he appears more often in WWE than the Rock that he would be used different than the Rock, if he appeared so many times but wrestled for the title and is constantly in the main event he knows that he would be soon more hated than John Cena and a 20 times world champion so you can't compare Jericho, Kane or Mark Henry with Rock, Lesnar or Austin who don't appear very often
I have to ask here...the point im making is that the Rock is a part timer, holding the belt. Why are you pointing it out to me that he only appears on a limited basis? Do you like supporting someone elses argument while simultaneously trying to present your own side?