Re: Froot: Lovable Character or Defecating Home Invader?
*Scalies is the more appropriate term, but even then, they aren't even anthropomorphic, so I doubt "furries" would be better to use than just "creatures".
Re: Froot: Lovable Character or Defecating Home Invader?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Froot
Don't recall calling it "dumb", but I do recall calling it excruciatingly boring.
My ideal picture of a video game doesn't appear as fighting the same monotonous, 2-5 min battles, with the only possible motivation to continue being fictional bragging rights that I'll never show off.
Badmouthing Pokemon = you are shit. Yes, that's right. Shit.
__________________ http://prograps.blogspot.com/ I've kinda stopped writing in here, I guess. Maybe not forever, IDK. PORBABA;Y (< was supposed to say 'probably' and shows how badly I type when attempting to do it swiftly. I did not edit it just because)
YEAH1993 LIKE BUTTON made by that dude who used to have George Costanza wearing a Santa hat in his avatar. Credit to that guy.
Re: Froot: Lovable Character or Defecating Home Invader?
To quote the man, the myth, the legend, vivalabrave: "Pokemon is sewage."
(that's a direct quote, btw)
I've actually been strangely fascinated by that Pokemon thread lately. I have no idea what any of it means (my brother used to play it so I at least recognise one avatar), but I find myself reading it anyway.
Fuck me, I literally have nothing better to do right now. Nothing.
Re: Froot: Lovable Character or Defecating Home Invader?
2D fighting games have a shitload more variety than what Pokémon has to offer. Would rather find myself taking a gander at the dozens upon hundreds of combos in Tekken, that be restrained to four attacks which take 10 seconds each to pull off, and have fuck all impact on the billionth or so try.