Officially your bitch?
Becoming more so every single time you post, actually.
What argument have I possibly lost?
The one you've been arguing. Duh.
B asked a question, you acted like a cunt, I posted links to stories which I admit I know nothing of which are based on the question she asked, you continued to act like a cunt.
No, I laughed because it was out and out a stupid question. You've been harping up and down the thread posting gibberish about people getting "sent down" for defending themselves, when your own articles clearly list that they were not arrested or did any jail time for defending themselves. They were arrested fpr illegally owning a firearm and recklessness with a deadly firearm. The simple fact that the guy shot a guy in his home doesn't make THE GUN HE SHOULDN'T HAVE HAD any more legal. If you aren't getting that by now, then may whatever you believe in help your feeble little mind.
The Ivan Drago
Go outside, lad.
Would you rather I was a figurative Joe Horn and you were a figurative Miguel Dejesus?
I'm asking questions, posting stories.
I have my opinion of people being able to defend themselves, if somebody breaks then it's fair game, but it does happen. People in the UK get sent down for stabbing people who break in to their home. B's question was about shooting somebody who breaks in to your home in the US.
Not in the United States it doesn't. You will not get prosecuted for killing an intruder in your home/on your property. That is the castle doctrine - the actual law - I've been giving you for the last page and a half.
The story of the guy who shot at the floor when the person who broke in to his home then moved on to the next door, I asked GS if he would shoot somebody who is then off of his propety. He assumed I was calling him a hypocrit for that.
Please. You're just going in circles now. Everyone is telling you that you're pretty dense, bro. You've become a running joke in my USER CP. Heed it and weep.