Quote:
Originally Posted by LINK
Typical Republican rebuttal. First line... attack and undermine your opponents with an insult(the first sign of a weak argument) while addressing and answering who? No one particular, just your fantasy opponent.
|
He attacked those who attacked first.
Quote:
|
Second line... make some extreme generalization about something and create a logical fallacy with it.
|
Funny, I just busted you on that. How odd.
Quote:
|
Third line... completely and totally make up a "fact".
|
Funny, you did this as well.
Quote:
|
Plus having a questionable citizenship and getting a blow job in the oral office are by far no worse than abusing your executive authority to spy on people, aka Patriot Act and Watergate, which are directly in violation of the constitution. Or how about killing off the only Democratic political family that you have to worry about in politics as the head of the CIA? I mean let's throw out a true conspiracy with the birth certificate. Bush, Nixon, Hunt and many other benefiting big R's were in Dallas that day. I think that's the equivalent to a piece of paper that could have been forged.
|
Hey, who was president when we went into Vietnam? That was a justified war, right? Stopping Jihad/Muslim extremists = stopping communism. So while you're bias liberal leanings are once again readily apparent, you fail to acknowledge that there are issues for both sides, supported by mounds of evidence. And Watergate was a complete joke. You know what else was a violation of the Constitution? Obamacare. Any comment on that, or only on Republican issues?