There are plenty of people who run for President who have no business doing so.
No one should have expected Obama to make any major changes in 4 years. Especially since he had to inherit the mess that Bush left. It also doesn't help that there are stubborn Republicans who want to sabotage Obama's ideas and hurt the country just to prove a point.
No one should have expect Obama to make any major changes in 4 years? Yeah, you're right. 3.5 trillion in his FIRST year and still nothing. Obama's ideas such as "Obama Care", "Cash for Clunkers" and "Solyndra" are ideas alright... bad ones.
I'd rather have a 80 year-old Paul serve one term, than nothing. Paul was a physician, physicians have the upper hand when it comes to their own health. Listen to him speak, he speaks very fluently, doesn't miss a beat and has many historic events/constitution memorized accurately. He also admits to being a "compulsive exerciser".
They said how fluent and smart Obama was too.
Actually, doctors tend to live a shorter period of time due to stress. On top of that, being in office ages you very fast. Look at the last three presidents before and after. Clinton got heart disease, W aged fas, Obama has to get a frequent dye job.
I would vote for Paul right behind Huntsman. But Paul's coworkers don't like him, they won't work with him to accomplish anything. Then we have to wait to get them all out of office.
Last edited by ItsWhatIdo; 01-09-2012 at 09:55 AM.