Originally Posted by CM Skittle
I agree, anti-smarks are the worst just because they try WAY too hard to support things that you know they don't really like, they just say stuff to be different no matter how dumb it is. But smarks are super annoying too, people need to learn to just be FANS and not be either of those.
This coming from the woman who called Finlay 'a 70 year old Grandpa who needs to hang it up', just saying.
On topic: I don't care for Angle at all, find Cena in 2007 to be very good and nowhere near that level anymore but still capable of delivering in the big matches and find HBK to be an excellent performer but not really a GOAT 'wrestler'. In terms of delivering a show and entertaining a crowd only Eddie or Flair may top HBK but there's plenty of guys who appeal more to my tastes than he does and would honestly say he was better in a tag team than in singles (I happen to think he's an all time great tag worker though so take it as a compliment and not an insult).
People with 'elitist' opinions aren't necessarily elitist, I probably don't care for a number of workers people would call 'great' but I'd certainly be able to list why I don't care for them or why I prefer the style of wrestling I do, instead of simply saying '.....sucks /thread'. More often than not people who refuse to argue their opinions when questioned can come off far more smarkish and elitist than people who have unconventional opinions but can back them up no sweat.