should have thought about that before doing other stupid things to get warned.
These are my warnings. Now, to my knowledge, the comment is supposed to be why you were warned.
Warned By | Warned | Post Warned Date | Warning Type | Comment
Otacon | Review Post | On 07-21-2004 At 03:07 AM | Spamming | faggot
Nitemare | Review Post | On 08-04-2004 At 09:30 PM | Spamming | Not really spam, but an insult. Didn't want to go the full 10 points.
Rajah | Review Post | On 09-03-2004 At 11:47 PM | Flaming | stfu
So, if comment is why I was warned, I have two other bullshit warnings...
The reason you are warned is the link to the post that you were warned for. I'll check them and see if I agree with them.
K, lets see...Otacon warned you because you said you wanted to have 5 warning points for no reason. Your fault there....duh...
Nitemare warned you for insulting someone when all they did was post a request in a wrong spot. Seems like a good warning to me. Hell, he was even nice enough to warn you on spamming, instead of flaming, which would only give you five instead of ten. Nice guy, that Nitemare.
Then Rajah warned you for telling him to stfu for no real reason. I myself wouldn't have warned you for that exact reason, but oh well. If we strictly followed the rules, it'd probably be the same results.