I admitted that it has both bad and good moments, and there for I watch it because there's still things worth watching it for. Don't try to twist my words around and ignore other things I say, it just makes you look like an even bigger dumbshit than before. An argument like that might work over on youtube or the TNA section where the abundance of trolls lurk, but not here or anywhere else on this forum for that matter.
Guess what, every wrestling promotions has both bad and good moments, that is not a valid argument why WWE is better than other promotions.
TNA had some shitty moments and the company deserves to be mocked for that but guess what, WWE has also these shitty moments. There is not one valid point in your comments why you prefer WWE over TNA.
And the fact that you associate the TNA section with the trolls on the internet shows only that you're nothing but an ignorant WWE mark.
Posting for example "that might work over on YouTube, TNA or the general WWE section
" you would come across as a neutral user but now you expose yourself as a little WWE mark even more
No, I would answer "because the things I want to see they provide me with, whether it's good wrestling or good entertaining promos, and I'm still very interested in where they are going with things right now. Many of my favorites are a part of the WWE, such as Daniel Bryan, one of my all time favorites, Antonio Cesaro, Cm Punk, Christian, The Shield, the Wyatts, Sandow, Sheamus, I enjoy watching these guys and I enjoy what WWE does with them. Simply because there's other things in the WWE that I do not enjoy does not mean I just give up on the other things that I enjoy about it. That's retarded. That's like saying I should give up school because despite the fact that I love the experience I've learned from living on my own and being able to meet new people and major in something I really enjoy and want to have a career in, I hate the workload put on me."
If all these guys were in TNA you would call them a bunch of no names and if anyone of these guys appears on TNA you would start calling them WWE rejects and you know I'm right. You can lie to me but stop lying to yourself by posting that crap
Something along those lines. I'm not sure if you realize this or not, but when people watch something, it's because they enjoy watching it.
Says the guy who posted in his last post that WWE can't for the life of them produce good wrestling on a strongly consistent basis and that their product is often idiotic and corny. Do you realize how idiotic it sounds?
Something like "I watch a sitcom for 10 years that is idiotic but every 2 months there is a scene that makes me laugh"
You're probably the first person I've seen on this website claim that we watch WWE because of its name. Your logic is very confusing. Maybe making sense might help?
Of course most watch it only because of it's name, they watch it out of habit.
Did you seriously just compare a 30 year marriage ending and parenting issues to not watching WWE?
Of course not because a marriage is more valuable but these people still know when to quit when it's enough. On the other side you have a shitty wrestling show where most people complain about but they can't stop watching, because they are too weak
And making things up will not help your cause. We don't watch WWE because of it's past, and you know it. That has to be the dumbest reason I've seen anti-wwe morons such as yourself make.
Of course you do. Take away the past decades in WWE (ignore everything in WWE until 2010), take away the part timers like The Rock, Brock Lesnar, Triple H and Undertaker and tell me why WWE is better than TNA or Ring of Honor? WWE has a roster full of bland guys and indy heroes. Unique personalities like Hogan, Austin and The Rock made WWE great. Over the top characters like Undertaker, Randy Savage and Ultimate Warrior made WWE cool. Athletes that would make it in every other sport like Kurt Angle, Shawn Michaels, Chris Benoit and Eddie Guerrero gave us great moments when it comes to ring work, these are all stars of the past.
Give me one good reason why WWE is so much better than TNA and what gives you the right to act ignorant because you watch something that is better other than "hurr durr because it's WWE"
No...it really isn't. That isn't like saying that at all. How do you even come to these conclusions? We watch the WWE because we enjoy the product. It's as simple as that. We enjoy what we see. Your comparison suggests we liked what we saw back then. If your theory about why we watch WWE was actually true then you'd have a point here, but the fact of the matter is, it isn't true. And the fact of the matter is, you're a fucking idiot for thinking it is. Facts are facts. If you aren't willing to comply with them like the dumbass that this thread was made about, then good luck living in your own fantasy world when you're older. I'm sure you'll have a lot of fun with that experience.
LOL listen to yourself "If your theory about why we watch WWE was actually true then you'd have a point here, but the fact of the matter is, it isn't true."
What are facts? "I watch it because I enjoy it". That is not a fact idiot, that is your opinion, that's like saying it's a fact that green looks better than blue because I like that colour. Fact is that WrestleMania is the only PPV that has over 1 million buys. tell me why? If the product is really that good then the other PPVs in year would have the same numbers. It's because WrestleMania is such a big name, a name made by the stars from the past, the stars from the 80s and 90s. Of course The Rock has also a lot to do with it, also a star from the past.
Also, I'm old enough to remember when WWE was great unlike you who thinks WWE delivers a good product because you don't know it better
If I had to choose between doing that and reading all of your posts, then yes. At least I wouldn't lose brain cells while fucking the old lady.
You wouldn't lose it anyway because you already lost enough every Monday