prove to me that hardcore belt changed more than TV and ic. fine I shouldn't get an advantage....why should the others? are they not good enough? your argument is horrible. if you are the champ, it means u know your shit so the order of advantage should be reversed with hard core getting most help and the champion being an actual true champion
The Hardcore title was active in WWE from November 2nd 1998 until August 26 2002, where it was unified with the Intercontinental title. Over that period (3 years 9 months and 25 days, or 1394 days) there were 234 Champions. The average reign lasting 6 days.
Over the same period, there were 51 Inter continental Champions. The average reign lasting 27 days. 4.5 times longer than the Hardcore average reign.
Over its entire existance, the Intercontinental title has been active for 33 years, 7 months and 19 days or 12,285 days (to date). There has been 140 Champions over that time, with the average reign lasting 88 days (15 times longer then the Hardcore).
So, having been active for 30 years more, the Intercontinental title has had 94 less champions.
ifi had to do a reward system.....this is why i wouod do.
world- your oppenwnt cant pick the current world champions on either roster
ic - both get a 9th pick..the kicker? the champ gets to pick the opponents 9th who has to be a wrestler fighting in a championship match, doesnt matter which one
TV - has to defend every week but gets 9th man advantage
hardcore- 50% of 9th pick
Yes, because nothing could go wrong with any of these suggestions.
Oh, and for someone with a 'teacher' gimmick, your grammar is terrible.